Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to bettermemory

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server that gives coding agents persistent, verified memory of codebase decisions, conventions, and skills, with evidence-based claims that are re-checked via git hooks and human-gated review. Enables memory search, propose/approve, chat harvesting, and critique across MCP-compatible tools.
      21
      58 npm
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A local-first MCP server that manages developer memory for coding agents, enabling shared project context, permissions, and audit trails across different agents.
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that gives AI coding agents persistent memory across sessions, storing architecture decisions, past bugs, and codebase conventions locally.
      14 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that gives AI agents persistent, file-based memory stored as plain markdown files in a local git repository, enabling agents to remember, recall, and build on information across sessions.
      4 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A local MCP memory server that gives AI assistants durable project memory across coding sessions, storing context, changes, and decisions.
      5 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that captures and recalls coding session memory (failures, decisions, diffs) for AI agents, enabling cross-agent continuity and preventing repeated mistakes.
      41 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 18 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a clearly distinct resource and action (search vs list vs show; write vs update vs remove vs verify; memory vs episode tier; scope enable/disable). Memory_write_confirm and memory_write_cancel are separate and unambiguous, and memory_audit_turn is explicitly not for model use.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent pattern: memory_<verb> and episode_<verb>, using snake_case throughout. Verbs are descriptive (write, update, remove, verify, search, list, show). No mixed conventions or vague verbs.

    Tool Count4/5

    18 tools is on the heavier side but appropriate for a memory server covering memory lifecycle, scoping, verification, usage tracking, and an episode tier. Each tool has a distinct role; no redundancy. Slightly above the ideal 3-15 range but justified by the breadth of the domain.

    Completeness4/5

    Core CRUD and verification flows are fully covered (write, confirm/cancel, update, remove, verify, restore via reference). However, tools referenced in descriptions like memory_restore, memory_list_tombstones, memory_conflicts, and memory_proposals are not actually exposed, creating minor gaps. Agents can work around these by using memory_remove and memory_write, but the surface is not entirely self-contained.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues