Substack-OPS
Related Servers
Alternatives to Substack-OPS
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMedium CLI + 23-tool MCP server. Hybrid official API + dashboard GraphQL. Your IDE drafts the responses — no AI API keys.23MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceA local MCP server for managing saved Substack posts. Enables offline reading, searching, bookmarking, and unbookmarking of Substack content via CLI or MCP clients.17MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for Substack that enables reading articles, comments, feed, and subscriptions from AI clients like Cursor and Claude, with optional authentication for paid content.35 npm3MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for Substack that lets Claude Code create drafts, upload images, set cover thumbnails, schedule, and publish posts on your Substack publication.1115MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceA credential-free MCP server that turns a Substack publication's public RSS archive and official analytics snapshots into a durable, queryable local SQLite ledger. It provides 12 MCP tools for browsing posts, tracking versions, recording metric snapshots, and analyzing content patterns.12Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceFastMCP server for Substack: publish Notes and posts, pull analytics, manage drafts, bridge Obsidian vault drafts, and generate visual cards.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 26 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose. Related tools like get_post, get_post_by_id, and get_post_content are differentiated by input type and output. The staged write process (propose_reply/confirm_reply) is well-separated from direct writes (comment_on_post, delete_comment). Debugging tools (audit_search, dedup_status) are distinct from operational ones.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern. Verbs are descriptive (get_, list_, create_, publish_, propose_confirm_, etc.) and nouns match the resource (post, comment, note, profile, draft). There is no mixing of conventions or vague verbs.
With 26 tools, the set is comprehensive but slightly above the ideal range. However, each tool addresses a specific operation or workflow (e.g., staging replies, batch drafts, debugging), and no tools feel redundant. The count is justified by the breadth of Substack's features covered.
The tool set covers reading and writing for comments, notes, reactions, restacks, and basic post metadata. However, there is no tool for creating or editing long-form posts, which is a notable omission for a Substack management server. The server seems focused on community engagement rather than full publishing.