Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to medium-ops

Related Servers

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    One MCP that turns Claude Code into your whole dev stack by swallowing other MCP servers, delegating to Codex & Gemini on your CLI subscriptions, remembering projects in a searchable knowledge graph, and carrying setup across sessions — secret-free by design.
    23
    3
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    One local gateway for all your MCP servers — shared by every AI coding tool (Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex). Set up each server once; keys stay in the OS keychain; lazy discovery keeps agent context small. Local-first, open source.
    4
    12 npm
    215
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    A unified developer toolkit for AI-assisted workflows. Task timing, doc drift detection, env validation, secret scanning, port conflict resolution, AI context generation, and license auditing — one MCP server, one install.
    7
    3
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    An MCP server that bridges AI assistants to other CLI tools, enabling capabilities like large-context reads, vision, file generation, and cross-vendor verification without API keys.
    6
    235 PyPI
    2
    Apache 2.0

TDQS

A3.6/5.0

Scored across 23 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose with no overlap. Read-only tools cover specific queries (e.g., get_post vs get_post_content, list_responses vs get_unanswered_responses), and write tools handle distinct actions (publishing, clapping, replying via staging/confirmation). Even similar operations are differentiated by their target or workflow.

Naming Consistency4/5

Most tools follow a verb_noun pattern (e.g., get_post, publish_post, confirm_reply). The outlier is bulk_draft_replies, which starts with a noun-like word instead of a clear verb. Overall, naming is predictable and readable.

Tool Count4/5

23 tools is on the higher side, but each tool serves a specific need in the Medium domain (reading various data, writing with different operations). The count is justified by the breadth of functionality without being excessive.

Completeness4/5

The tool set covers most core Medium interactions: reading posts, profiles, responses, search, stats; writing responses, publishing, clapping, drafting replies. Missing operations like editing or deleting posts are minor gaps, but the workflow for replies is thorough.

Maintenance

ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues