reddit_profile_get

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description is the sole source of behavioral disclosure. It indicates a read operation ('Return') and lists returned fields, but does not explicitly state it is read-only, nor does it mention authentication, rate limits, or side effects. The behavior is mostly inferred, not fully transparent.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences that front-load the purpose and immediately enumerate the returned fields. No unnecessary words or repetition; every sentence adds value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given a single parameter, no annotations, and an existing output schema, the description covers the key aspects: it specifies the return type (dict) and lists the main fields. It is nearly complete, though it could note that the output schema provides further structure.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 0% description coverage for the only parameter 'name'. The description does not specify what 'name' refers to (e.g., Reddit username, profile ID). It only says 'one profile', which is insufficient to guide the agent on valid input values.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool returns a profile's full configuration as a dict, specifying the exact resources it retrieves (subreddits, search_terms, etc.). This verb-resource pairing distinguishes it from sibling tools like reddit_profiles (listing profiles) and reddit_get_evidence (specific evidence).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage when needing the full configuration of a specific profile, but it does not provide explicit guidance on when to use this over alternatives like reddit_profiles for listing or reddit_get_evidence for partial data. No when-not conditions are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.