Skip to main content
Glama

TWZRD Agent Intelligence

get_facilitator_footprint

Read-onlyIdempotent
Free discovery: which x402 facilitators a payer has settled through, and how many.

unique_facilitators = 1 is a thin/captive agent (locked to one rail); breadth
across facilitators indicates a more established cross-rail agent. Returns the
facilitator_ids list plus tx/merchant context. Fail-open: a DB gap returns
data_available=false rather than erroring.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
walletYesSolana wallet public key (32-44 base58 chars) to look up its x402 facilitator footprint.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
errorNoPresent only on the degraded path.
foundNoTrue if the wallet has observed corpus activity.
walletNoThe wallet looked up.
tx_countNoTotal observed paid calls.
last_seenNoISO timestamp of last observed activity.
first_seenNoISO timestamp of first observed activity.
data_availableNoFalse when the corpus/DB was unavailable.
facilitator_idsNoThe facilitator identifiers observed for this payer.
unique_merchantsNoDistinct merchants paid.
unique_facilitatorsNoDistinct x402 facilitators this payer has settled through (1 = thin/captive).

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4.4/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations indicate readOnlyHint and idempotentHint. The description adds beyond these by specifying fail-open behavior (returns data_available=false on DB gap) and the exact data returned (facilitator_ids list plus tx/merchant context), which are not covered by annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise with four sentences covering purpose, interpretation, and behavioral details. It is front-loaded with the main purpose and avoids fluff, though could be slightly more compact.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has only one parameter and an output schema (exists but not shown), the description provides sufficient context: purpose, interpretation hints, and fail-open behavior. It is complete for the tool's complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and the schema already fully describes the wallet parameter (format, base58). The description does not add any additional parameter semantics, so baseline score of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it provides discovery of which x402 facilitators a payer has settled through and their count, with a specific verb (discovery) and resource (facilitator footprint). It distinguishes from sibling tools like get_x402_directory by focusing on a specific payer's settled facilitators.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives interpretive guidance (e.g., unique_facilitators = 1 indicates a thin/captive agent) and contextual hints for when to use the tool (to assess cross-rail activity). However, it does not explicitly state when not to use it or name alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.