tenzro-chainlink

All tools are grouped by service prefix (ccip_, chainlink_, ds_, por_, vrf_) and each has a unique purpose. For example, ccip_get_fee and ccip_send_message are clearly distinct, and even within similar functions like chainlink_get_price and ds_get_report, the descriptions clarify they target different data sources (on-chain feeds vs. low-latency streams). No overlap.

Tool names follow a consistent pattern of service prefix + verb_noun (e.g., ccip_get_fee, ds_list_feeds, vrf_request_random). Even longer names like chainlink_broadcast_signed_tx adhere to the pattern. There is no mixing of cases or inconsistent verb forms.

21 tools covering multiple Chainlink products (CCIP, Data Feeds, Data Streams, VRF, Functions, Automation, Proof of Reserve) is well-scoped. Each tool serves a distinct needed capability without bloat, and the count is within the ideal range for a focused integrated server.

The tool set covers core read and write operations for most services (e.g., full CCIP workflow from fee estimation to message sending and tracking). However, there are minor gaps: no tool to create or manage subscriptions (only get), and no direct Functions request execution (only cost estimation and subscription query). These are workable but not fully complete.