Skip to main content
Glama

Server Details

Sputnik X: EU trade 63M+, LV customs, salary, sanctions, EU AI Act, SoulLedger + x402 USDC.

Status
Unhealthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL
Repository
drivenbymyai-max/mcp-sputnikx-market
GitHub Stars
0
Server Listing
mcp-sputnikx-market

Glama MCP Gateway

Connect through Glama MCP Gateway for full control over tool access and complete visibility into every call.

MCP client
Glama
MCP server

Full call logging

Every tool call is logged with complete inputs and outputs, so you can debug issues and audit what your agents are doing.

Tool access control

Enable or disable individual tools per connector, so you decide what your agents can and cannot do.

Managed credentials

Glama handles OAuth flows, token storage, and automatic rotation, so credentials never expire on your clients.

Usage analytics

See which tools your agents call, how often, and when, so you can understand usage patterns and catch anomalies.

100% free. Your data is private.
Tool DescriptionsB

Average 3.5/5 across 28 of 28 tools scored. Lowest: 2.9/5.

Server CoherenceC
Disambiguation2/5

The tool set suffers from significant overlap and unclear boundaries, particularly within the 'soul_' and 'trade_' categories. For example, 'soul_compliance' and 'soul_compliance_check' appear to serve similar regulatory purposes, while 'query_trade', 'trade_corridor', and 'trade_seasonality' all involve trade data analysis with ambiguous distinctions. This overlap makes it difficult for an agent to reliably select the correct tool without extensive trial and error.

Naming Consistency4/5

Naming is mostly consistent with a clear snake_case pattern and descriptive verbs, such as 'check_availability', 'create_quote', and 'get_prices'. However, there are minor deviations like 'calculator' (a noun instead of a verb_noun) and 'soul_analytics' (which could be more specific), slightly reducing the overall consistency. The majority of tools follow a predictable structure, aiding in readability.

Tool Count2/5

With 28 tools, the count is excessive for a single server, leading to a bloated and confusing interface. The server covers disparate domains like trade intelligence, salary data, and AI agent analytics, which should ideally be split into separate, focused servers. This over-scoping makes the tool set feel heavy and difficult to navigate efficiently.

Completeness3/5

There are notable gaps in coverage across the server's broad domains. For trade intelligence, basic CRUD operations (e.g., creating or updating trade records) are missing, relying solely on querying and analysis. In the salary domain, only Latvia is covered in detail, lacking broader EU data beyond overviews. The AI agent tools offer analytics but lack management functions like creating or modifying agents, leaving workflows incomplete.

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Related MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    AI intelligence oracle + cross-border settlement rail. 10-layer Stability Oracle (climate, macro, FX, ESG, supply chain) with x402 pay-per-call data API. USDC/EURC settlement on Base at 1.385% all-in. GENIUS Act + MiCA + Basel III compliant.
    13
    91
    1
    MIT
  • A
    license
    -
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    MCP server providing EU compliance APIs for VAT validation, sanctions screening, counterparty checks, and invoice extraction. Enables AI agents to make pay-per-call requests settled in USDC on Base via x402, with no account or API key required.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Non-custodial USDC <-> bank for AI agents. Free quotes; $0.05 USDC per session via x402; 1% commission itemised in every quote. Own funds only. PT + EU/EEA (not UK). 18+.
    4
    1,204
    1
    MIT

View all MCP Servers

Try in Browser

Your Connectors

Sign in to create a connector for this server.