Skip to main content
Glama

Server Details

Search golf tee times by natural language. Returns GolfNow booking links. Does not book or hold.

Status
Healthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL

Glama MCP Gateway

Connect through Glama MCP Gateway for full control over tool access and complete visibility into every call.

MCP client
Glama
MCP server

Full call logging

Every tool call is logged with complete inputs and outputs, so you can debug issues and audit what your agents are doing.

Tool access control

Enable or disable individual tools per connector, so you decide what your agents can and cannot do.

Managed credentials

Glama handles OAuth flows, token storage, and automatic rotation, so credentials never expire on your clients.

Usage analytics

See which tools your agents call, how often, and when, so you can understand usage patterns and catch anomalies.

100% free. Your data is private.
Tool DescriptionsA

Average 4.9/5 across 1 of 1 tools scored.

Server CoherenceA
Disambiguation5/5

Only one tool exists, so there is no possibility of ambiguity or confusion between tools.

Naming Consistency5/5

The single tool has a clear, descriptive name ('search_tee_times') that matches its purpose, and with only one tool, naming is inherently consistent.

Tool Count5/5

The server is focused solely on searching golf tee times, and a single search tool is appropriately scoped for that purpose.

Completeness4/5

The tool covers the primary search functionality well, but the server lacks other potential operations (e.g., booking, course details) that might be expected in a golf tee time service, though the description explicitly states it does not book.

Available Tools

1 tool
search_tee_timesSearch golf tee timesA
Read-only
Inspect

Search golf tee times, hot deals, and cheapest rounds by city, ZIP, or course name. Use for tee times, booking a round, weekend golf, twilight, or comparing courses nearby. No GolfNow FacilityId needed. Returns GolfNow URLs; does not book, hold, or charge. Ask for a city/ZIP/course and date if missing.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
queryYesNatural language search, e.g. "Saturday morning near San Francisco for 2" or "Harding Park tomorrow afternoon"
userTimezoneNoIANA timezone of the golfer, e.g. America/Los_Angeles
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds behavioral context beyond the annotations: 'Returns GolfNow URLs; does not book, hold, or charge.' This clarifies the output format and the tool's non-transactional nature. It also states 'No GolfNow FacilityId needed,' which is a useful input requirement detail. These details are consistent with the readOnlyHint and destructiveHint annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is three sentences long, with each sentence serving a distinct purpose: scope/action, usage context, and limitations/guidance. It is front-loaded with the main purpose and avoids redundant or filler content. No unnecessary details are included.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is relatively simple with only two parameters and no output schema. The description covers all important aspects: what it searches, how to use it, what it returns (GolfNow URLs), what it doesn't do, and how to handle missing inputs. This is complete enough for an agent to invoke the tool correctly in most scenarios.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already provides 100% coverage with descriptive parameter text, giving a baseline of 3. The description adds extra meaning by explaining that searches are 'by city, ZIP, or course name,' which clarifies what the 'query' parameter should contain. The 'userTimezone' parameter is sufficiently documented in the schema and doesn't need additional explanation in the description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: 'Search golf tee times, hot deals, and cheapest rounds by city, ZIP, or course name.' It uses a specific action verb ('search') and identifies the exact resource types. It also differentiates itself from booking tools by explicitly noting it 'does not book, hold, or charge.'

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly lists when to use the tool: 'Use for tee times, booking a round, weekend golf, twilight, or comparing courses nearby.' It also provides practical guidance, such as 'Ask for a city/ZIP/course and date if missing,' which helps the agent manage incomplete user requests. The non-booking statement implies a limit on usage, functioning as a when-not.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Related MCP Servers

View all MCP Servers

Try in Browser

Your Connectors

Sign in to create a connector for this server.

Resources