Skip to main content
Glama

NeedATicket ticket prices

Server Details

A read-only MCP server from NeedATicket with one tool, search_ticket_prices. It returns live "from" prices for upcoming concerts, sport, theatre and festivals, checked hourly from StubHub listings, and can filter by artist, team, venue, city, dates and maximum price, or sort by cheapest, soonest or biggest price drop. Every result links to the event's page, which shows the price history, other dates and where to buy.

UK edition (prices in GBP): https://needaticket.co.uk/mcp

Ownership verified
Status
Healthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP · MCP 2025-06-18
URL

TDQS

A4.4/5.0

Scored across 1 tool

Disambiguation5/5

There is only one tool, so there is no ambiguity or risk of selecting the wrong tool. Its purpose is clearly stated as searching live ticket prices.

Naming Consistency5/5

With a single tool, the name search_ticket_prices follows a clear verb_noun-style pattern and is readable and predictable. There are no inconsistent conventions to compare against.

Tool Count3/5

A single tool is defensible for a narrow ticket-price search service, but it feels thin for a server meant to answer varied event-price questions. One tool can work, but it leaves little surface for refreshing, filtering, or retrieving specific event details separately.

Completeness4/5

The core operation for a ticket-price service is present: searching live from-prices with links to event pages. Minor gaps remain, such as a dedicated event-detail or explicit refresh operation, but the linked event pages provide a workaround.

Available Tools

1 tool
search_ticket_pricesSearch live ticket pricesA
Read-onlyIdempotent
Inspect

Live "from" prices for upcoming concerts, sport, theatre and festivals, checked hourly from StubHub listings by NeedATicket.co.uk. Prices are per ticket in GBP before the seller's fees. Use it for questions like "cheapest Oasis tickets", "what's on in Manchester next weekend" or "how much are Metallica Sphere tickets". Every result links to the event's page on NeedATicket.co.uk, which shows the current price, other dates and where to buy. An event page's price can be refreshed live on demand; priceCheckedAt says when it was last read.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
toNoLast event date to include, YYYY-MM-DD.
fromNoFirst event date to include, YYYY-MM-DD (the event's local date).
sortNoprice = cheapest first; soon = soonest first; drop = biggest 7-day price fall; low = furthest below its usual price.
limitNoResults to return (default 10).
queryNoArtist, team, show or venue name. Part of a word is fine.
anywhereNoInclude events in every country, not only this site's home country. Default true when a query is given; a city with no events at home is also looked for abroad.
max_priceNoHighest "from" price per ticket, in GBP.
event_cityNoOnly events held in this town or city, as named in the question, e.g. "london", "las-vegas". Not the user's own location.

TDQS

A4.4/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already cover read-only/idempotent/non-destructive, and the description adds substantive context beyond them: prices are refreshed hourly, are per ticket in GBP, exclude seller fees, results link out to the event page, and priceCheckedAt records last-read time. That freshness and price-semantics disclosure is exactly what an agent needs to avoid misrepresenting the numbers.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Purpose and data provenance are front-loaded, followed by usage examples and return/link behavior. The final two sentences are slightly verbose but each carries real information (link destination, live refresh, priceCheckedAt), so nothing is wasted.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, the description responsibly covers the return side (per-result link to the event page, priceCheckedAt field) and the freshness contract. Combined with a fully documented schema and safety annotations, an agent has everything needed to call and interpret it.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so all eight parameters (including sort enum values and the anywhere default rule) are already documented in the schema. The description only loosely gestures at query/city/date through example questions and adds no syntax or format detail beyond it — baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific resource (live "from" ticket prices) with explicit scope: upcoming concerts, sport, theatre and festivals, sourced from StubHub and checked hourly. An agent knows exactly what data this returns and at what granularity (per ticket, GBP, pre-fees).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives three concrete example questions ("cheapest Oasis tickets", "what's on in Manchester next weekend", "how much are Metallica Sphere tickets") that map cleanly onto the query/city/date parameters, making the intended use case obvious. It stops short of stating when NOT to use it or naming alternatives, but there are no sibling tools to route away from.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. 1 tool update
    • First observedsearch_ticket_prices

Related MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables brand visibility monitoring across major AI platforms like ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity. It allows users to track visibility scores, analyze competitor data, and receive actionable insights to improve AI-generated brand recommendations.
    16
    18 npm
    1
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Browse IndustryLens's published competitive-intelligence reports and head-to-head competitor comparisons from any AI agent — real, source-backed data.
    MIT
Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources