Skip to main content
Glama

Server Details

Token-efficient search for coding agents over public and private documentation.

If you are the author of this connector, you can claim ownership with GitHub, an HTTP challenge, or a DNS record. Claimed connector authors can inspect health checks, view analytics, and manage their listing.
Status
Unhealthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL
Repository
ref-tools/ref-tools-mcp
GitHub Stars
1,164
Server Listing
Ref

Frequently Asked Questions

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Token-optimized semantic code search with automatic context expansion for AI coding assistants, enabling efficient discovery of code relationships and reducing token usage.
    4
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Adds semantic code search to AI coding agents, enabling natural language queries across entire codebases to retrieve relevant code chunks, saving tokens and providing deep context.
    48
    1
    MIT
  • F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables coding agents to retrieve task-relevant documentation from a repository's markdown files using deterministic keyword search, chunking, and co-location expansion, instead of reading entire docs.
Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4.1/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: one searches for documentation, and the other reads content from a specific URL. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them, as each serves a separate step in a workflow (search then read).

Naming Consistency5/5

Both tools follow a consistent 'ref_verb_noun' naming pattern (ref_search_documentation and ref_read_url). This prefix and structure make them predictable and easy to identify as part of the same server.

Tool Count2/5

With only two tools, the server feels too thin for its apparent purpose of documentation search and reading. A typical documentation toolset would include more operations, such as listing results, filtering, or managing resources, making this count insufficient for robust coverage.

Completeness2/5

The tool surface is severely incomplete for documentation handling. While search and read are covered, there are obvious gaps like no ability to create, update, delete, or organize documentation resources, and no tools for advanced queries or result management, limiting agent workflows.