pathguard
Server Details
Crypto transaction safety tool — screens addresses and transactions for scam risk.
Glama couldn't complete the latest health check. If this server requires authentication, missing or expired test credentials may be the cause. A test profile lets Glama authenticate for health checks and discover tools; it is separate from your personal connections.
If you are the author, claim ownership, then add or update a test profile under Admin → Test Profile.
- Status
- Unhealthy
- Uptime
- 73.5% over 27 days
- OAuth
- Not checked
- Last Tested
- Transport
- Streamable HTTP
- URL
- Repository
- Utee/pathguard-mcp
- GitHub Stars
- 0
- Server Listing
- pathguard-mcp
TDQS
Scored across 5 tools
check_transaction and preflight_transaction both analyze a crypto transaction for risk; the only real differentiator is the output shape (raw signals vs. an ALLOW/REVIEW/BLOCK decision). Batch, usage, and report tools are clearly distinct, but this one overlapping pair creates genuine misselection risk.
All five tools follow a clean snake_case verb_noun pattern (check_transaction, get_usage_status, preflight_transaction, report_scam_address). The plural variant check_transactions_batch is a natural, readable extension of the same convention.
Five tools is well-scoped for a focused transaction-risk-checking service. Each tool earns its place: single check, batch check, decision, usage, and reporting.
The surface covers the core lifecycle (check single, check batch, preflight decision, report scam, usage/quota). Minor gaps exist, such as no standalone address-risk check or retrieval of past scan results, but agents can work around these via the existing checks.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
5 tool updates
- First observed
check_transaction - First observed
check_transactions_batch - First observed
get_usage_status - First observed
preflight_transaction - First observed
report_scam_address
Related MCP Connectors
Free crypto scam checks: token and contract risk, scam or sanctioned addresses, phishing links.
Crypto security, honeypot detection, wallet analysis, and token risk scoring across 31 blockchains.
Token Risk — rug-pull / honeypot screening for crypto tokens.
Pre-transaction risk screening for Ethereum addresses: signed score, sanctions, audit trail.
Related MCP Servers
- FlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to perform token security audits, honeypot detection, liquidity analysis, and risk scoring to avoid crypto scams.1-
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceProvides on-chain forensic checks for evaluating transaction risks, including token verification, rug-pull detection, and fund tracing, using public blockchain endpoints.1215 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceSafety layer for autonomous DeFi agents. Scans contracts for exploit patterns, simulates transactions, blocks honeypots.415 npm1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to assess the risk of crypto wallets, tokens, and smart contracts by providing read-only on-chain analysis, 0-100 risk scoring with explanations, fund tracing, and contract inspection before interaction.6MIT
Glama MCP Gateway
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.