A
licenseA
qualityB
maintenanceEnables structured step-by-step reasoning with branching, revisions, and self-critique to help break down complex problems into manageable steps with confidence tracking and thought history search.
7
19
7
MIT
Fortytwo MCP
Server Details
Ask high-complexity questions where the best answer is required — coding, hard reasoning, and more.
If you are the author of this connector, you can claim ownership with GitHub, an HTTP challenge, or a DNS record. Claimed connector authors can inspect health checks, view analytics, and manage their listing.
- Status
- Healthy
- Last Tested
- Transport
- Streamable HTTP
- URL
Available Tools
1 toolask_fortytwo_primeCInspect
Ask Fortytwo Prime and get a response
ParametersJSON Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| query | Yes | Question or task for the Swarm | |
| max_tokens | No | Maximum number of tokens in the response (512..128000, default 16384) |
TDQS
C2.2/5.0
Behavior2/5
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries the full burden for behavioral disclosure. It only mentions 'get a response,' which is trivial and expected. It does not disclose any side effects, rate limits, authentication needs, error behavior, or what a response contains. This is far too little context for an agent to anticipate behavior.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Conciseness2/5
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is one short sentence, but it is under-specified rather than efficiently concise. It lacks critical context that an agent needs, making it resemble an incomplete stub. A concise description should still carry meaningful information; this one does not.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Completeness2/5
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's simplicity (no output schema, no annotations, only two parameters), the description should still explain what Fortytwo Prime is and what kind of tasks it can handle. The current text offers no contextual depth, leaving the agent to rely on the name and parameter schema alone. This is inadequate for reliable tool selection.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Parameters3/5
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100% and there are only two parameters, with the schema already providing clear meanings for 'query' and 'max_tokens'. The description adds no parameter information, so it neither helps nor hurts. The baseline of 3 is appropriate because the schema is self-sufficient.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Purpose2/5
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Ask Fortytwo Prime and get a response' is nearly a tautology of the tool name. It names the resource and action but adds no scope or specificity about what kinds of questions or tasks Fortytwo Prime handles. Without sibling tools, there is no differentiation, but the purpose is still too vague to be helpful.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Usage Guidelines2/5
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, prerequisites, or context. It simply states the action and result, leaving the agent to infer usage entirely from the schema. No exclusions or alternative tool references are given.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Frequently Asked Questions
Claiming proves that you control a remote MCP connector. It does not move, proxy, or interrupt the server.
Open the connector listing, choose Claim ownership, and sign in to Glama.
Complete one verification method:
GitHub identity — fastest for official registry listings. For a namespace such as
io.github.alice/server, link the matching GitHub user or an account that owns the GitHub organization, then choose Claim with GitHub.HTTP challenge — works when you can deploy a public file. Generate a token, publish the exact JSON Glama shows at
/.well-known/glama.jsonon the same origin as the connector, then choose Check HTTP challenge.DNS challenge — works when you control DNS but cannot change the server. Generate a token, create the exact TXT record Glama shows, wait for it to propagate, then choose Check DNS challenge.
After verification, Glama sends a confirmation email and gives you access to listing details, thumbnails, health checks, and analytics. Keep the HTTP file or DNS record in place: Glama periodically checks it and ownership remains verified while the token is discoverable.
The HTTP ownership file has this structure:
{
"$schema": "https://glama.ai/mcp/schemas/connector.json",
"claim": "glama_claim_..."
}Claim tokens are opaque, stable, and bound to the signed-in Glama account. They contain no email address or other personal information. If Glama can no longer discover a verified HTTP or DNS token, it starts a seven-day grace period before removing claim-based access. Restore the same token during that period to keep ownership verified. Never publish an email address, Glama session token, GitHub token, or connector credential as ownership proof.
If verification fails, confirm that you copied the current token exactly. The HTTP file must be public, return valid JSON with a successful HTTP response, and stay on the connector's origin. DNS changes may need more time to propagate. A claim cannot transfer to a different origin or hostname: if the connector target changes, Glama starts the grace period and the new target must be claimed separately after the previous claim is released.
For a connector linked to the official MCP Registry, registry updates continue to replace its name, description, and URL by default. After claiming, open Manage connector and enable Use Glama listing details as the source of truth if edits made on Glama should be preserved. Categories and thumbnails are always managed on Glama; registry linkage and technical connection settings continue to sync.
Control your server's listing on Glama, including description and metadata
Access analytics and receive server usage reports
Get monitoring and health status updates for your server
Feature your server to boost visibility and reach more users
To improve your MCP server's ranking:
Claim ownership of the server listing
Complete the server profile with an accurate description and thumbnail
Provide a test profile so Glama can connect to and evaluate the server
Keep tool definitions clear and complete to earn a high Tool Definition Quality Score (TDQS)
Route real usage through the Glama Gateway; more recorded successful server uses also improve the ranking
For users:
Full audit trail – every tool call is logged with inputs and outputs for compliance and debugging
Granular tool control – enable or disable individual tools per connector to limit what your AI agents can do
Centralized credential management – store and rotate API keys and OAuth tokens in one place
Change alerts – get notified when a connector changes its schema, adds or removes tools, or updates tool definitions, so nothing breaks silently
For server owners:
Proven adoption – public usage metrics on your listing show real-world traction and build trust with prospective users
Tool-level analytics – see which tools are being used most, helping you prioritize development and documentation
Direct user feedback – users can report issues and suggest improvements through the listing, giving you a channel you would not have otherwise
The connector status is unhealthy when Glama is unable to successfully connect to the server. This can happen for several reasons:
The server is experiencing an outage
The URL of the server is wrong
Credentials required to access the server are missing or invalid
If you are the owner of this MCP connector and would like to make modifications to the listing, including providing test credentials for accessing the server, please contact support@glama.ai.
Discussions
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!
Related MCP Connectors
StackExchange-style Q&A network where AI agents ask, answer, critique, and earn reputation.
Multiple AIs peer-review and debate your question, then return one fact-checked answer.
Search, reuse, verify AI reasoning. Task marketplace with leaderboard. Zero-barrier, no auth.
Delegate tasks to vetted human experts - research, writing, analysis, and data work.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to efficiently solve problems by estimating complexity, pruning unnecessary paths, and focusing search through web search, code analysis, and persistent investigation tracking.75MIT
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables complex problem-solving through multi-modal reasoning, dynamic knowledge graphs, meta-cognitive reflection, and collaborative AI personas.13
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to achieve production-ready solutions through iterative refinement and recursive thinking processes. It features token optimization via context compression and session-based tracking to improve problem-solving depth while minimizing cost.235MIT
Try in Browser
Glama MCP Gateway
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
TDQS
B3/5.0
Disambiguation5/5
With only one tool, there is no possibility of ambiguity or misselection. The tool's purpose is clearly defined as asking Fortytwo Prime and receiving a response.
Naming Consistency5/5
The single tool name follows a clear verb_noun pattern (ask_fortytwo_prime) and is consistent in style. Since there is only one tool, there is no inconsistency.
Tool Count5/5
The server is explicitly designed for a single purpose: to ask Fortytwo Prime. One tool is perfectly scoped and appropriate for this narrow domain, even though typical servers have more tools.
Completeness5/5
The domain is Q&A with Fortytwo Prime, and the tool covers the complete interaction (ask and get response). There are no obvious missing operations or dead ends for this purpose.