Zhihuo RotoSpider Layout
Server Details
Rotomolding mold-on-arm layout feasibility: which molds fit on a machine arm/spider, and how.
- Status
- Healthy
- Uptime
- 99.9% over 46 days
- Last Tested
- Transport
- Streamable HTTP · MCP 2025-11-25
- URL
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
check_mold_layout and send_feedback have completely different purposes, with no overlap in functionality or risk of misselection. The feedback tool is clearly auxiliary and cannot be confused with the layout engine.
Both tool names follow the same lowercase verb_noun snake_case convention: check_mold_layout and send_feedback. The naming pattern is consistent and predictable.
With only two tools, the server is at the low end of the range. One core domain operation plus a feedback channel is borderline but understandable for a highly specialized layout-checking engine.
For its stated purpose, check_mold_layout is comprehensive: it handles preset and custom machines, multiple mold geometries, clearance checks, riser selection, load limits, units, and full-envelope scanning. No obvious domain gaps remain; send_feedback covers reporting.
Available Tools
2 toolscheck_mold_layoutARead-onlyIdempotentInspect
Check whether molds fit together on a rotational-molding machine arm.
Every answer comes from the deterministic RotoSpider geometric layout
engine: rotation-envelope and dead-height checks, pairwise mold-to-mold
clearance, offset-arm riser selection, and ring arrangements for 3+
identical molds. It never returns a physically invalid layout.
Args:
molds: List of mold objects. Use one explicit unit convention:
Box/frame mold: {"length_mm": L, "width_mm": W, "height_mm": H}.
Cylinder/tank mold: {"diameter_mm": D, "height_mm": H}.
Exact L, slope, triangle, frustum, or complex mold: measured
length_mm+width_mm+height_mm plus the complete
geometry_asset_id+geometry_asset_revision returned by the
geometry WebAPI or another trusted publisher.
Decimal-inch aliases are length_in, width_in, height_in, and
diameter_in. Each value is converted once to canonical
micrometres; do not give both aliases for the same value.
Optional per mold: "name", "weight_kg", "quantity" (default 1;
use 0 to retain the mold type without requesting a copy).
machine: Public-sample straight-arm preset. Available models are
listed in the tool description. Leave empty AND give no
explicit geometry to scan all presets ("which machine can take
these molds?").
arm_type: 'straight' (dual spiders) or 'offset' (single-spider
offset/L arm). Empty = both.
spider_diameter_mm: Custom machine - spider (mounting plate)
diameter. Giving this plus envelope_diameter_mm switches to
custom-machine mode instead of presets.
envelope_diameter_mm: Custom machine - rotation envelope diameter
(for offset arms: the vertical envelope diameter).
dead_height_mm: Custom straight arm - unusable center height
between the upper and lower spider surfaces.
offset_spider_y_mm: Custom offset arm - spider Y offset from the
spider center to the sphere center (required for custom offset).
offset_horz_diameter_mm: Custom offset arm - horizontal usable
envelope diameter after side trim (defaults to envelope).
riser_heights_mm: Custom offset arm - available riser heights; the
solver picks the best (or none).
*_in: Decimal-inch aliases for the matching custom-arm and
clearance *_mm arguments.
max_load_weight_kg: Optional arm weight capacity; the solver loads
molds only up to this total weight.
clearance_target_mm: Target mold-to-mold clearance (default 300).
clearance_min_mm: Minimum acceptable clearance (default 150).
allow_overhang_within_envelope: Allow every mold shape to extend
past the spider edge while its complete active shape remains
inside the rotation envelope. Defaults to false.
include_layout: Include request-relative mold placements, each
with its heading in milli-degrees (angleMilliDeg).
display_unit: 'mm' (default) or 'in'. Canonical result fields remain
millimetres; 'in' adds a display projection rounded to 0.00001 in.
response_api: The answer's version, rotospider.layout-check.v3,
the default and the only version.
Returns a summary sentence plus per-arm results: feasible, placed vs
requested counts (per mold type when available), selected riser height,
spider utilization, center-of-gravity offset, achieved clearance, and
the engine's reason when molds do not fit.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| molds | Yes | ||
| machine | No | ||
| arm_type | No | ||
| display_unit | No | mm | |
| response_api | No | rotospider.layout-check.v3 | |
| dead_height_in | No | ||
| dead_height_mm | No | ||
| include_layout | No | ||
| clearance_min_in | No | ||
| clearance_min_mm | No | ||
| riser_heights_in | No | ||
| riser_heights_mm | No | ||
| max_load_weight_kg | No | ||
| offset_spider_y_in | No | ||
| offset_spider_y_mm | No | ||
| spider_diameter_in | No | ||
| spider_diameter_mm | No | ||
| clearance_target_in | No | ||
| clearance_target_mm | No | ||
| envelope_diameter_in | No | ||
| envelope_diameter_mm | No | ||
| offset_horz_diameter_in | No | ||
| offset_horz_diameter_mm | No | ||
| allow_overhang_within_envelope | No |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations indicate readOnlyHint=true and idempotentHint=true, so the description does not need to restate safety. It goes beyond by explaining the deterministic nature ('never returns a physically invalid layout') and the engine's behavior, such as unit conversion and the distinction between canonical and display units. It does not mention all edge cases (e.g., error handling), but the annotations cover the read-only aspect.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is comprehensive but becomes lengthy due to the detailed parameter list. It is well-structured with a clear intro, an Args section, and a Returns section, which aids navigation. However, it could be tightened by moving some parameter details into a linked reference, but the current structure is acceptable for a complex tool.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's complexity (24 parameters, no output schema, no nested objects), the description covers all necessary information: input formats, unit handling, behavior, and return content. It even specifies the exact response API version. No critical gaps noted; the description compensates for the lack of an output schema and the bare parameter names.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description is the sole source of parameter meaning. It explains each parameter in detail, including unit aliases, defaults, and conditions for custom mode. It even clarifies the use of quantity=0 and the conversion to micrometres, which is invaluable when the schema only lists names.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states that the tool checks whether molds fit together on a rotational-molding machine arm, and details the specific deterministic engine and checks performed. It distinguishes itself from any sibling by focusing on layout feasibility, and the title reinforces this.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides explicit guidance on when to use the tool, such as leaving machine empty to scan all presets, and also gives instructions on how to provide molds. It implies alternatives indirectly (e.g., scanning presets) and clearly states the conditions for custom mode. Although no alternative tool is named, the usage context is thorough.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
send_feedbackAInspect
Relay a user question, bug report, or suggestion to the maintainers.
Args:
message: The user's feedback text (required).
contact: Optional reply address the user volunteers.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| contact | No | ||
| message | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations indicate non-readonly, and description confirms it relays feedback. No additional behavioral context (e.g., auth, rate limits) provided.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two sentences plus Args list, efficient and no wasted words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Simple tool with two parameters; description covers their purpose adequately. No output schema, but return value is not critical for this action.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema has 0% description coverage; description adds meaning for both parameters, explaining message is required and contact is optional reply address.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states the verb 'relay' and resource 'feedback to maintainers', distinguishing it from the sibling 'check_mold_layout'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Explicitly lists when to use (user question, bug report, suggestion) but lacks when-not-to-use or alternatives.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
1 tool update
- Changed
check_mold_layout1 field changed- changed
Input schema / properties / response_api / defaultPrevious value: -"rotospider.layout-check.v1"New value: +"rotospider.layout-check.v3"
1 tool update
- Changed
check_mold_layout1 field changed- added
Input schema / properties / include_layoutAdded value: +{ + "default": false, + "title": "Include Layout", + "type": "boolean" +}
1 tool update
- Changed
check_mold_layout1 field changed- added
Input schema / properties / allow_overhang_within_envelopeAdded value: +{ + "default": false, + "title": "Allow Overhang Within Envelope", + "type": "boolean" +}
1 tool update
- Changed
check_mold_layout1 field changed- added
Input schema / properties / response_apiAdded value: +{ + "default": "rotospider.layout-check.v1", + "title": "Response Api", + "type": "string" +}
1 tool update
- Changed
check_mold_layout31 fields changed- added
Input schema / properties / clearance_min_inAdded value: +{ + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null, + "title": "Clearance Min In" +} - added
Input schema / properties / clearance_min_mm / anyOfAdded value: +[ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } +] - changed
Input schema / properties / clearance_min_mm / defaultPrevious value: -150New value: +null - removed
Input schema / properties / clearance_min_mm / typeRemoved value: -"integer" - added
Input schema / properties / clearance_target_inAdded value: +{ + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null, + "title": "Clearance Target In" +} - added
Input schema / properties / clearance_target_mm / anyOfAdded value: +[ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } +] - changed
Input schema / properties / clearance_target_mm / defaultPrevious value: -300New value: +null - removed
Input schema / properties / clearance_target_mm / typeRemoved value: -"integer" - added
Input schema / properties / dead_height_inAdded value: +{ + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null, + "title": "Dead Height In" +} - added
Input schema / properties / dead_height_mm / anyOfAdded value: +[ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } +] - changed
Input schema / properties / dead_height_mm / defaultPrevious value: -0New value: +null - removed
Input schema / properties / dead_height_mm / typeRemoved value: -"integer" - added
Input schema / properties / display_unitAdded value: +{ + "default": "mm", + "title": "Display Unit", + "type": "string" +} - added
Input schema / properties / envelope_diameter_inAdded value: +{ + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null, + "title": "Envelope Diameter In" +} - added
Input schema / properties / envelope_diameter_mm / anyOfAdded value: +[ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } +] - changed
Input schema / properties / envelope_diameter_mm / defaultPrevious value: -0New value: +null - removed
Input schema / properties / envelope_diameter_mm / typeRemoved value: -"integer" - added
Input schema / properties / offset_horz_diameter_inAdded value: +{ + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null, + "title": "Offset Horz Diameter In" +} - added
Input schema / properties / offset_horz_diameter_mm / anyOfAdded value: +[ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } +] - changed
Input schema / properties / offset_horz_diameter_mm / defaultPrevious value: -0New value: +null - removed
Input schema / properties / offset_horz_diameter_mm / typeRemoved value: -"integer" - added
Input schema / properties / offset_spider_y_inAdded value: +{ + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null, + "title": "Offset Spider Y In" +} - added
Input schema / properties / offset_spider_y_mm / anyOfAdded value: +[ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } +] - changed
Input schema / properties / offset_spider_y_mm / defaultPrevious value: -0New value: +null - removed
Input schema / properties / offset_spider_y_mm / typeRemoved value: -"integer" - added
Input schema / properties / riser_heights_inAdded value: +{ + "anyOf": [ + { + "items": { + "type": "number" + }, + "type": "array" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null, + "title": "Riser Heights In" +} - changed
Input schema / properties / riser_heights_mm / anyOfPrevious value: -[ - { - "items": { - "type": "integer" - }, - "type": "array" - }, - { - "type": "null" - } -]New value: +[ + { + "items": { + "type": "number" + }, + "type": "array" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } +] - added
Input schema / properties / spider_diameter_inAdded value: +{ + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null, + "title": "Spider Diameter In" +} - added
Input schema / properties / spider_diameter_mm / anyOfAdded value: +[ + { + "type": "number" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } +] - changed
Input schema / properties / spider_diameter_mm / defaultPrevious value: -0New value: +null - removed
Input schema / properties / spider_diameter_mm / typeRemoved value: -"integer"
2 tool updates
- First observed
check_mold_layout - First observed
send_feedback
Related MCP Connectors
Manufacturing should-cost from CAD and drawings: cost drivers, process plan, lot sizes.
Instant parametric cost estimates for custom manufacturing: CNC, molding, sheet metal, 3DP, PCB.
Plan optimal container & truck loads: 3D layouts, utilization, centre of gravity, crush checks.
Real FEA on CAD parts: validated setups, stress, safety factor, natural frequencies
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenancePlan optimal container & truck loads: 3D layouts, right-size the container mix, and check utilization, centre of gravity, crush protection and securing across 200+ equipment types.11 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables 2D irregular polygon nesting (bin-packing) with tools to design, preview, get reports, and export DXF files for laser cutting or CNC routing.MIT
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceCross-OEM industrial machine intelligence. Normalizes telemetry across 16 manufacturer families (Fanuc, Siemens, Haas, DMG Mori, Mazak), enables plain-English operational automation, and produces tamper-evident work records. 14 MCP tools.14-

SmartCutofficial
FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceSmartCut is a hosted cutting-optimisation API. It turns a list of parts and available stock into machine-ready cutting patterns for sheet materials (plywood, MDF, glass, plastic, sheet metal), linear stock (timber, bar, pipe, extrusion) and roll goods. Guillotine and true-shape nesting modes, with grain direction, per-part orientation locks, edge banding, blade kerf and stock trim.2-
Glama MCP Gateway
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.