pifini
Server Details
Real events, reviewed places, and ticket checkout across the Caribbean and Latin America.
- Status
- Healthy
- Uptime
- 100.0% over 41 days
- Last Tested
- Transport
- Streamable HTTP · MCP 2025-11-25
- URL
TDQS
Scored across 6 tools
Each tool maps cleanly to a distinct resource and action: searching vs. retrieving events/places, enumerating categories, and creating ticket checkouts. There is no meaningful overlap that would confuse an agent choosing among these tools.
All tool names follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern: search_*, get_*, list_*, create_*. The naming style is uniform and predictable across the whole server.
With 6 tools, the server is appropriately scoped for its purpose: discovering events and places, retrieving details, resolving category taxonomy, and purchasing tickets. No tool feels redundant or extraneous.
The tool surface covers the full user journey: search for events/places, get detailed information, discover valid category values, and create a ticket checkout. There are no obvious missing operations that would create a dead end for an agent.
Available Tools
6 toolscreate_ticket_checkoutCreate ticket checkout linkAInspect
Create a secure Stripe-hosted payment link for event tickets. Returns a checkout URL — give it to the human to complete payment themselves; each ticket is then emailed with its QR code and its own link, which opens on any phone and can be saved to WhatsApp. Get ticket_type_id values from get_event. Always confirm the exact tickets and total with the human before calling this.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| items | Yes | Ticket selections | |
| buyer_name | No | Buyer's name (optional) | |
| event_slug | Yes | Event slug | |
| buyer_email | Yes | Email to deliver tickets to (required — ask the human) |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| event | No | |
| total | No | |
| currency | No | |
| order_id | No | |
| checkout_url | No | |
| instructions | No |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description adds meaningful behavioral context beyond the annotations: the payment link is Stripe-hosted, the human completes payment themselves, and each ticket is emailed with a QR code and phone-friendly link. This explains side effects and follow-up behavior. The annotations are generic and do not contradict the description.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Three well-structured sentences: the main action, the return/behavior, and the required human-confirmation step. Every sentence earns its place, and no information is wasted or buried.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The description covers the core workflow: create the link, hand it to the human, and know what happens after payment. It also includes the critical prerequisite and confirmation step. It could have explicitly tied event_slug to get_event as well, but the schema and output schema cover the remaining details sufficiently.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents all four parameters and their roles. The description repeats the 'ticket_type_id from get_event' guidance already present in the schema and adds no new parameter syntax, format, or source details beyond that. Baseline 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description opens with a specific verb and resource: 'Create a secure Stripe-hosted payment link for event tickets.' It clearly distinguishes the tool from the sibling get/search tools, and the return value (checkout URL) is stated explicitly. An agent can immediately tell what the tool accomplishes.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description gives clear usage context: get ticket_type_id values from get_event, and always confirm exact tickets and total with the human before calling. It does not explicitly state when not to use this tool or name alternatives, but no close alternative exists among the siblings, so the guidance is sufficient.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
get_eventGet event detailsARead-onlyIdempotentInspect
Full details for one event by slug: description, venue, date/time, and available ticket types with prices and remaining stock. Use the slug from search_events.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| slug | Yes | Event slug from search_events |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| url | No | |
| city | No | |
| slug | No | |
| price | No | |
| title | No | |
| country | No | |
| ends_at | No | |
| summary | No | |
| website | No | |
| category | No | |
| currency | No | |
| timezone | No | IANA timezone of the venue, e.g. America/Mexico_City. Null when unknown. |
| starts_at | No | Exact start instant, ISO-8601 UTC. Do NOT format this for a human — it is the wrong calendar day in most of the region. Use local_date / local_time. |
| local_date | No | The date the event actually happens where it happens, YYYY-MM-DD. Quote this one. |
| local_time | No | Local start time, HH:MM 24h. Null when start_time_known is false — say nothing about the time in that case. |
| description | No | |
| entry_model | No | |
| ticket_types | No | |
| location_name | No | |
| organizer_url | No | |
| attendee_count | No | |
| organizer_name | No | |
| cover_image_url | No | |
| start_time_known | No | False when only the date is known and the stored hour is a placeholder. Never present a start time when this is false. |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, destructiveHint=false, and idempotentHint=true. The description adds value by explicitly enumerating the returned fields (venue, date/time, ticket types with prices and remaining stock), giving the agent a preview of the response content beyond what annotations convey.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is two concise sentences, front-loaded with the core purpose and then a practical usage hint. No redundant words or repetition of structured fields, making every sentence earn its place.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
With one simple parameter, high schema coverage, an output schema, and complete annotations, the description adequately covers the tool's behavior and usage. It mentions the key response elements, making it self-sufficient for a straightforward getter.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with a description 'Event slug from search_events'. The tool description repeats this with 'Use the slug from search_events', reinforcing but not adding new meaning beyond the schema. The baseline is 3 given high schema coverage.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states it provides 'Full details for one event by slug' and lists specific response components (description, venue, date/time, ticket types with prices and stock). This distinguishes it from siblings like search_events, which find events, and get_place, which retrieves place details.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description tells the user to 'Use the slug from search_events', providing a clear prerequisite and source for the input. It implies this tool is for fetching a specific event's full details, but does not explicitly state when not to use it or offer alternative tool comparisons beyond the slug hint.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
get_placeGet place details + reviewsARead-onlyIdempotentInspect
Full details for one place by slug, including its most recent published reviews if any exist. listing_type distinguishes a curated entry from an unreviewed directory listing (see search_places) — recent_reviews is often an empty array, which means no reviews yet, not a low-quality place. Use the slug from search_places.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| slug | Yes | Place slug from search_places |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| url | No | |
| city | No | |
| name | No | |
| slug | No | |
| type | No | |
| address | No | |
| country | No | |
| summary | No | |
| website | No | |
| category | No | |
| avg_rating | No | |
| price_tier | No | |
| description | No | |
| is_verified | No | |
| is_sponsored | No | |
| listing_type | No | |
| review_count | No | |
| recent_reviews | No |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true, and destructiveHint=false, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds valuable behavioral context: it explains that recent_reviews may be an empty array meaning no reviews yet (not a low-quality place), and that listing_type distinguishes curated vs. directory entries. This goes beyond the annotations and helps interpretation.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is two concise sentences with no filler. The core purpose is front-loaded, and the important caveat about empty recent_reviews is included. Every sentence earns its place.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple single-parameter tool with an output schema, the description covers the essential usage: how to get the slug, what the response contains, and how to interpret a key field. No critical information is missing. The output schema handles return structure, so description need not duplicate that.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, so the slug parameter is already documented. The description adds a meaningful hint about the parameter's origin ('Use the slug from search_places'), which is not in the schema and helps the agent correctly obtain the input. This is a value-add beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool returns full details for one place by slug, including recent reviews. It distinguishes this from search tools by referencing search_places for slug acquisition and explaining listing_type, though it doesn't explicitly name a sibling alternative like get_event. The verb-resource pairing is specific.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides the source for the required slug ('Use the slug from search_places') and clarifies the meaning of an empty recent_reviews array. However, it does not explicitly state when to use this tool vs. alternatives (e.g., when you have a slug and need details, use this rather than search_places). The guidance is implied but not fully explicit.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
list_categoriesList place categoriesARead-onlyIdempotentInspect
Discover valid category values for search_places. Pifini's places directory uses Overture Maps' taxonomy — over 1,000 specific values like caribbean_restaurant, church_cathedral, landmark_and_historical_building — rather than broad buckets, so guessing a category string will usually miss. Call this first with a rough query (e.g. 'coffee' or 'beach') to find the exact value, then pass it to search_places' category parameter.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | No | Max results, 1-100 (default 30) | |
| query | No | Rough term to match against category values, e.g. 'coffee', 'beach' | |
| country | No | ISO-3166 alpha-2 country code — only return categories present in that country |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| count | Yes | |
| categories | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true, destructiveHint=false. The description adds valuable behavioral context: it uses Overture Maps taxonomy with over 1,000 specific values, and that guessing will usually miss. This explains why the tool is needed and what it returns, beyond what annotations provide.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single paragraph but is front-loaded with the purpose, followed by context and usage instruction. Every sentence adds value; no fluff. It is appropriately sized for the tool's simplicity.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given an output schema exists (so return values are covered), the description is complete. It explains why the taxonomy is needed, how to use the tool, and how to pass results to search_places. The only minor gap is no explicit mention of 'limit' behavior, but schema covers that. Overall comprehensive.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, so each parameter has a schema description. The description adds meaning by explaining that 'query' is a 'rough query' (partial match) and that 'country' filters by country presence. This aids understanding beyond raw schema, though the description does not detail every parameter.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states the tool's purpose: 'Discover valid category values for search_places.' It uses a specific verb (discover) and resource (category values), and distinguishes itself from sibling tools like search_places by acting as a preparatory step. Examples of specific category values further clarify the scope.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Explicitly tells when to use: 'Call this first with a rough query... then pass it to search_places' category parameter.' It contrasts with guessing, providing clear context for usage. No alternative tool is mentioned, but the recommendation is direct and actionable.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
search_eventsSearch eventsARead-onlyIdempotentInspect
Search upcoming events (festivals, carnivals, concerts, food + cultural events) across the Caribbean, Latin America, and beyond. Returns event names, dates, locations, category, price (when known), and page URLs. Strongest coverage: Barbados, Trinidad, Jamaica, Bahamas, Mexico.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| city | No | City name filter | |
| limit | No | Max results, 1-50 (default 10) | |
| query | No | Free-text search over title and description | |
| offset | No | Skip this many matching results (for paging past the limit) | |
| country | No | ISO-3166 alpha-2 country code, e.g. BB, TT, JM | |
| category | No | Filter by event category | |
| near_lat | No | Latitude to search near (pair with near_lng) | |
| near_lng | No | Longitude to search near (pair with near_lat) | |
| radius_km | No | Search radius in km around near_lat/near_lng (default 25, max 500) | |
| entry_model | No | Filter by how someone gets in: 'free' = confirmed free entry, 'ticketed' = Pifini sells tickets, 'external' = paid but sold elsewhere, 'mixed' = umbrella event with both free and paid components, 'unknown' = not yet confirmed either way. | |
| include_past | No | Include past events (default false) | |
| starts_after | No | Earliest start. A bare date ('2026-08-01') matches the event's LOCAL calendar date in its own timezone and is inclusive — this is what you want for 'what's on this weekend'. A full ISO timestamp ('2026-08-01T18:00:00Z') is compared as an exact UTC instant instead. | |
| starts_before | No | Latest start, same rules as starts_after. A bare date is inclusive of that whole local day, so starts_after='2026-08-13' with starts_before='2026-08-13' returns everything happening on the 13th where it happens. |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| count | Yes | Number of events in this page of results |
| total | Yes | Total events matching the filters, across all pages. Use this before claiming how many exist. |
| events | Yes | |
| has_more | Yes | True when more matches exist beyond this page. |
| next_offset | No | Pass as `offset` to fetch the next page. Null when this is the last page. |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and destructiveHint=false, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds value by noting coverage limitations ('Strongest coverage: Barbados, Trinidad...') and return field specifics including the 'price (when known)' caveat, which helps set expectations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is two sentences with no waste. It front-loads the action ('Search upcoming events...') and scope, then concisely lists return fields and coverage strengths.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the rich schema (13 params, all documented) and the presence of an output schema, the high-level description is sufficient. It orients the agent to the tool's purpose and geographic focus without needing to restate parameter semantics. Slightly more context about filtering capabilities would push it to 5, but it is complete enough.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
All 13 parameters have detailed descriptions in the schema (100% schema description coverage), including nuanced explanations for starts_after and starts_before date handling. The tool description adds no parameter-level detail beyond what the schema already provides, so the baseline score of 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states it searches upcoming events (festivals, carnivals, concerts, food + cultural events) across a specific geography. It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like search_places and get_event by focusing on multi-event search for the Caribbean/Latin America region.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
It provides clear context for when to use the tool (event discovery in specific regions) but does not explicitly mention when not to use it or name alternatives. The context is sufficient for an agent to infer it is the right tool for finding events as opposed to places or single-event details.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
search_placesSearch places and businessesARead-onlyIdempotentInspect
Search Pifini's places directory across the Caribbean and Latin America — restaurants, bars, beaches, attractions, venues, hotels, tour operators, professionals, and services. Every result carries listing_type: 'curated' is a small, editorially reviewed set of flagship entries; 'directory' is the much larger set sourced from open map data (name, category, location, contact info) that has no reviews yet — say so rather than implying a recommendation the data doesn't back up. Category is a specific Overture taxonomy value (e.g. caribbean_restaurant, church_cathedral), not a broad bucket — call list_categories first if unsure of the exact value. Results marked is_sponsored are paid placements — disclose that when recommending.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| city | No | City name filter | |
| limit | No | Max results, 1-50 (default 10) | |
| query | No | Free-text search over name and summary | |
| offset | No | Skip this many matching results (for paging past the limit) | |
| country | No | ISO-3166 alpha-2 country code | |
| category | No | Filter by exact category value (e.g. 'caribbean_restaurant'). Use list_categories to discover valid values — there are 1,000+, not a small fixed set. | |
| near_lat | No | Latitude to search near (pair with near_lng) | |
| near_lng | No | Longitude to search near (pair with near_lat) | |
| radius_km | No | Search radius in km around near_lat/near_lng (default 25, max 500) | |
| entity_type | No | Filter by broad type of place |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| count | Yes | Number of places in this page of results |
| total | Yes | Total places matching the filters, across all pages. Use this before claiming how many exist. |
| places | Yes | |
| has_more | Yes | True when more matches exist beyond this page. |
| next_offset | No | Pass as `offset` to fetch the next page. Null when this is the last page. |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already mark this as read-only and non-destructive, so the description adds valuable context about result types (curated vs directory), data provenance, and disclosure requirements. No contradiction with annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is composed of three well-organized sentences, each conveying essential information: scope, result interpretation, and category taxonomy. No filler or redundancy.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The description covers critical operational nuances including regional scope, data quality tiers, category specificity, and sponsored content handling. With an output schema present, this is sufficiently complete for accurate use.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema already provides descriptions for all 10 parameters (100% coverage). The tool description adds minimal parameter-specific context beyond reiterating the category guidance already present in the schema, so it stays at the baseline 3.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states the tool searches Pifini's places directory across a specific region, listing the types of places covered. It distinguishes from siblings like search_events and get_place through resource specificity, making the purpose unambiguous.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Provides explicit guidance on when to use the tool and directs users to list_categories first for valid category values. It also gives behavioral instructions for interpreting curated vs directory results and disclosing sponsored content, going beyond basic usage.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
1 tool update
- Changed
get_place1 field changed- added
Output schema / properties / recent_reviews / items / properties / verification_basisAdded value: +{ + "description": "How the reviewer's visit was established. ticket_scan and transaction are strong evidence, rsvp and geo_checkin are weaker, manual is self-declared and none is an unverified opinion. Describe the review accordingly.", + "enum": [ + "ticket_scan", + "transaction", + "rsvp", + "geo_checkin", + "manual", + "none" + ], + "type": "string" +}
1 tool update
- Changed
search_events2 fields changed- changed
Input schema / properties / starts_after / descriptionPrevious value: -"Only events starting on/after this date, e.g. '2026-08-01' or a full ISO timestamp"New value: +"Earliest start. A bare date ('2026-08-01') matches the event's LOCAL calendar date in its own timezone and is inclusive — this is what you want for 'what's on this weekend'. A full ISO timestamp ('2026-08-01T18:00:00Z') is compared as an exact UTC instant instead." - changed
Input schema / properties / starts_before / descriptionPrevious value: -"Only events starting on/before this date, e.g. '2026-08-31' or a full ISO timestamp"New value: +"Latest start, same rules as starts_after. A bare date is inclusive of that whole local day, so starts_after='2026-08-13' with starts_before='2026-08-13' returns everything happening on the 13th where it happens."
3 tool updates
- Changed
get_event5 fields changed- added
Output schema / properties / local_dateAdded value: +{ + "description": "The date the event actually happens where it happens, YYYY-MM-DD. Quote this one.", + "type": "string" +} - added
Output schema / properties / local_timeAdded value: +{ + "description": "Local start time, HH:MM 24h. Null when start_time_known is false — say nothing about the time in that case.", + "type": [ + "string", + "null" + ] +} - added
Output schema / properties / start_time_knownAdded value: +{ + "description": "False when only the date is known and the stored hour is a placeholder. Never present a start time when this is false.", + "type": "boolean" +} - added
Output schema / properties / starts_at / descriptionAdded value: +"Exact start instant, ISO-8601 UTC. Do NOT format this for a human — it is the wrong calendar day in most of the region. Use local_date / local_time." - added
Output schema / properties / timezoneAdded value: +{ + "description": "IANA timezone of the venue, e.g. America/Mexico_City. Null when unknown.", + "type": [ + "string", + "null" + ] +}
- Changed
search_events9 fields changed- added
Output schema / properties / events / items / properties / local_dateAdded value: +{ + "description": "The date the event actually happens where it happens, YYYY-MM-DD. Quote this one.", + "type": "string" +} - added
Output schema / properties / events / items / properties / local_timeAdded value: +{ + "description": "Local start time, HH:MM 24h. Null when start_time_known is false — say nothing about the time in that case.", + "type": [ + "string", + "null" + ] +} - added
Output schema / properties / events / items / properties / start_time_knownAdded value: +{ + "description": "False when only the date is known and the stored hour is a placeholder. Never present a start time when this is false.", + "type": "boolean" +} - added
Output schema / properties / events / items / properties / starts_at / descriptionAdded value: +"Exact start instant, ISO-8601 UTC. Do NOT format this for a human — it is the wrong calendar day in most of the region. Use local_date / local_time." - added
Output schema / properties / events / items / properties / timezoneAdded value: +{ + "description": "IANA timezone of the venue, e.g. America/Mexico_City. Null when unknown.", + "type": [ + "string", + "null" + ] +} - added
Output schema / properties / has_moreAdded value: +{ + "description": "True when more matches exist beyond this page.", + "type": "boolean" +} - added
Output schema / properties / next_offsetAdded value: +{ + "description": "Pass as `offset` to fetch the next page. Null when this is the last page.", + "type": [ + "number", + "null" + ] +} - added
Output schema / properties / totalAdded value: +{ + "description": "Total events matching the filters, across all pages. Use this before claiming how many exist.", + "type": "number" +} - changed
Output schema / requiredPrevious value: -[ - "count", - "events" -]New value: +[ + "count", + "total", + "has_more", + "events" +]
- Changed
search_places5 fields changed- added
Output schema / properties / count / descriptionAdded value: +"Number of places in this page of results" - added
Output schema / properties / has_moreAdded value: +{ + "description": "True when more matches exist beyond this page.", + "type": "boolean" +} - added
Output schema / properties / next_offsetAdded value: +{ + "description": "Pass as `offset` to fetch the next page. Null when this is the last page.", + "type": [ + "number", + "null" + ] +} - added
Output schema / properties / totalAdded value: +{ + "description": "Total places matching the filters, across all pages. Use this before claiming how many exist.", + "type": "number" +} - changed
Output schema / requiredPrevious value: -[ - "count", - "places" -]New value: +[ + "count", + "total", + "has_more", + "places" +]
2 tool updates
- Changed
get_event1 field changed- added
Output schema / properties / ticket_types / itemsAdded value: +{ + "properties": { + "currency": { + "type": "string" + }, + "description": { + "type": [ + "string", + "null" + ] + }, + "name": { + "type": "string" + }, + "price": { + "type": "number" + }, + "remaining": { + "type": [ + "number", + "null" + ] + }, + "sales_end_at": { + "type": [ + "string", + "null" + ] + }, + "ticket_type_id": { + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "ticket_type_id", + "name", + "price", + "currency" + ], + "type": "object" +}
- Changed
get_place1 field changed- added
Output schema / properties / recent_reviews / itemsAdded value: +{ + "properties": { + "body": { + "type": [ + "string", + "null" + ] + }, + "date": { + "type": "string" + }, + "rating": { + "type": "number" + }, + "title": { + "type": [ + "string", + "null" + ] + }, + "verified_attendee": { + "type": "boolean" + } + }, + "required": [ + "rating", + "verified_attendee", + "date" + ], + "type": "object" +}
6 tool updates
- Changed
create_ticket_checkout1 field changed- changed
Output schema / (root)Previous value: -nullNew value: +{ + "properties": { + "checkout_url": { + "type": "string" + }, + "currency": { + "type": "string" + }, + "event": { + "type": "string" + }, + "instructions": { + "type": "string" + }, + "order_id": { + "type": "string" + }, + "total": { + "type": "number" + } + }, + "type": "object" +}
- Changed
get_event1 field changed- changed
Output schema / (root)Previous value: -nullNew value: +{ + "properties": { + "attendee_count": { + "type": "number" + }, + "category": { + "type": [ + "string", + "null" + ] + }, + "city": { + "type": [ + "string", + "null" + ] + }, + "country": { + "type": [ + "string", + "null" + ] + }, + "cover_image_url": { + "type": [ + "string", + "null" + ] + }, + "currency": { + "type": "string" + }, + "description": { + "type": [ + "string", + "null" + ] + }, + "ends_at": { + "type": [ + "string", + "null" + ] + }, + "entry_model": { + "type": "string" + }, + "location_name": { + "type": [ + "string", + "null" + ] + }, + "organizer_name": { + "type": [ + "string", + "null" + ] + }, + "organizer_url": { + "type": [ + "string", + "null" + ] + }, + "price": { + "type": [ + "object", + "null" + ] + }, + "slug": { + "type": "string" + }, + "starts_at": { + "type": "string" + }, + "summary": { + "type": [ + "string", + "null" + ] + }, + "ticket_types": { + "type": "array" + }, + "title": { + "type": "string" + }, + "url": { + "type": "string" + }, + "website": { + "type": [ + "string", + "null" + ] + } + }, + "type": "object" +}
- Changed
get_place1 field changed- changed
Output schema / (root)Previous value: -nullNew value: +{ + "properties": { + "address": { + "type": [ + "string", + "null" + ] + }, + "avg_rating": { + "type": [ + "number", + "null" + ] + }, + "category": { + "type": [ + "string", + "null" + ] + }, + "city": { + "type": [ + "string", + "null" + ] + }, + "country": { + "type": [ + "string", + "null" + ] + }, + "description": { + "type": [ + "string", + "null" + ] + }, + "is_sponsored": { + "type": "boolean" + }, + "is_verified": { + "type": "boolean" + }, + "listing_type": { + "enum": [ + "curated", + "directory" + ], + "type": "string" + }, + "name": { + "type": "string" + }, + "price_tier": { + "type": [ + "string", + "null" + ] + }, + "recent_reviews": { + "type": "array" + }, + "review_count": { + "type": "number" + }, + "slug": { + "type": "string" + }, + "summary": { + "type": [ + "string", + "null" + ] + }, + "type": { + "type": "string" + }, + "url": { + "type": "string" + }, + "website": { + "type": [ + "string", + "null" + ] + } + }, + "type": "object" +}
- Added
list_categories - Changed
search_events10 fields changed- added
Input schema / properties / categoryAdded value: +{ + "description": "Filter by event category", + "enum": [ + "music", + "arts", + "culture", + "festival", + "sports", + "food", + "business", + "nightlife" + ], + "type": "string" +} - added
Input schema / properties / entry_modelAdded value: +{ + "description": "Filter by how someone gets in: 'free' = confirmed free entry, 'ticketed' = Pifini sells tickets, 'external' = paid but sold elsewhere, 'mixed' = umbrella event with both free and paid components, 'unknown' = not yet confirmed either way.", + "enum": [ + "free", + "ticketed", + "external", + "mixed", + "unknown" + ], + "type": "string" +} - changed
Input schema / properties / limit / descriptionPrevious value: -"Max results, 1-25 (default 10)"New value: +"Max results, 1-50 (default 10)" - added
Input schema / properties / near_latAdded value: +{ + "description": "Latitude to search near (pair with near_lng)", + "type": "number" +} - added
Input schema / properties / near_lngAdded value: +{ + "description": "Longitude to search near (pair with near_lat)", + "type": "number" +} - added
Input schema / properties / offsetAdded value: +{ + "description": "Skip this many matching results (for paging past the limit)", + "type": "number" +} - added
Input schema / properties / radius_kmAdded value: +{ + "description": "Search radius in km around near_lat/near_lng (default 25, max 500)", + "type": "number" +} - added
Input schema / properties / starts_afterAdded value: +{ + "description": "Only events starting on/after this date, e.g. '2026-08-01' or a full ISO timestamp", + "type": "string" +} - added
Input schema / properties / starts_beforeAdded value: +{ + "description": "Only events starting on/before this date, e.g. '2026-08-31' or a full ISO timestamp", + "type": "string" +} - changed
Output schema / (root)Previous value: -nullNew value: +{ + "properties": { + "count": { + "description": "Number of events in this page of results", + "type": "number" + }, + "events": { + "items": { + "properties": { + "attendee_count": { + "type": "number" + }, + "category": { + "type": [ + "string", + "null" + ] + }, + "city": { + "type": [ + "string", + "null" + ] + }, + "country": { + "type": [ + "string", + "null" + ] + }, + "cover_image_url": { + "type": [ + "string", + "null" + ] + }, + "distance_km": { + "description": "Only present when near_lat/near_lng were given", + "type": [ + "number", + "null" + ] + }, + "ends_at": { + "type": [ + "string", + "null" + ] + }, + "entry_model": { + "type": "string" + }, + "organizer_name": { + "type": [ + "string", + "null" + ] + }, + "price": { + "properties": { + "currency": { + "type": "string" + }, + "max": { + "type": [ + "number", + "null" + ] + }, + "min": { + "type": "number" + }, + "note": { + "type": [ + "string", + "null" + ] + } + }, + "type": [ + "object", + "null" + ] + }, + "slug": { + "type": "string" + }, + "starts_at": { + "type": "string" + }, + "summary": { + "type": [ + "string", + "null" + ] + }, + "title": { + "type": "string" + }, + "url": { + "type": "string" + } + }, + "type": "object" + }, + "type": "array" + } + }, + "required": [ + "count", + "events" + ], + "type": "object" +}
- Changed
search_places9 fields changed- added
Input schema / properties / categoryAdded value: +{ + "description": "Filter by exact category value (e.g. 'caribbean_restaurant'). Use list_categories to discover valid values — there are 1,000+, not a small fixed set.", + "type": "string" +} - changed
Input schema / properties / entity_type / descriptionPrevious value: -"Filter by type of place"New value: +"Filter by broad type of place" - changed
Input schema / properties / limit / descriptionPrevious value: -"Max results, 1-25 (default 10)"New value: +"Max results, 1-50 (default 10)" - removed
Input schema / properties / min_ratingRemoved value: -{ - "description": "Minimum average rating 1-5", - "type": "number" -} - added
Input schema / properties / near_latAdded value: +{ + "description": "Latitude to search near (pair with near_lng)", + "type": "number" +} - added
Input schema / properties / near_lngAdded value: +{ + "description": "Longitude to search near (pair with near_lat)", + "type": "number" +} - added
Input schema / properties / offsetAdded value: +{ + "description": "Skip this many matching results (for paging past the limit)", + "type": "number" +} - added
Input schema / properties / radius_kmAdded value: +{ + "description": "Search radius in km around near_lat/near_lng (default 25, max 500)", + "type": "number" +} - changed
Output schema / (root)Previous value: -nullNew value: +{ + "properties": { + "count": { + "type": "number" + }, + "places": { + "items": { + "properties": { + "avg_rating": { + "type": [ + "number", + "null" + ] + }, + "category": { + "type": [ + "string", + "null" + ] + }, + "city": { + "type": [ + "string", + "null" + ] + }, + "country": { + "type": [ + "string", + "null" + ] + }, + "distance_km": { + "type": [ + "number", + "null" + ] + }, + "is_sponsored": { + "type": "boolean" + }, + "is_verified": { + "type": "boolean" + }, + "listing_type": { + "enum": [ + "curated", + "directory" + ], + "type": "string" + }, + "name": { + "type": "string" + }, + "price_tier": { + "type": [ + "string", + "null" + ] + }, + "review_count": { + "type": "number" + }, + "slug": { + "type": "string" + }, + "summary": { + "type": [ + "string", + "null" + ] + }, + "type": { + "type": "string" + }, + "url": { + "type": "string" + } + }, + "type": "object" + }, + "type": "array" + } + }, + "required": [ + "count", + "places" + ], + "type": "object" +}
5 tool updates
- First observed
create_ticket_checkout - First observed
get_event - First observed
get_place - First observed
search_events - First observed
search_places
Related MCP Connectors
Find upcoming concerts, festivals and cultural events across Latin America.
1Find Salsa and Bachata events and destination guides worldwide.
Search live events in 60+ countries, plan a night out, and demand artists to tour your city.
Live event discovery: concerts, club nights, art, comedy, and festivals across 14 cities.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceProvides music events, concerts, music festivals, nightclubs and other events information.172MIT
- -
- AlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceReal-time last-minute tour and activity booking across 18 suppliers in 15 countries via the OCTO open standard. Search available slots, create Stripe checkout sessions, and check booking status.41MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceDiscover and book theatre, shows, events, tours and experiences across 700+ cities worldwide on tickadoo® with real-time pricing and booking links.411 npm1MIT
Glama MCP Gateway
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.