Skip to main content
Glama

MHS BLOOM — Neutral Skincare Reference

Server Details

Query an independent, payment-blind reference of 1,682 dermacosmetic products — by product, ingredient, concern, category or brand. Neutral descriptive facts, every result links back to its reference page. No ratings, no paid placement.

Status
Healthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL

Glama MCP Gateway

Connect through Glama MCP Gateway for full control over tool access and complete visibility into every call.

MCP client
Glama
MCP server

Full call logging

Every tool call is logged with complete inputs and outputs, so you can debug issues and audit what your agents are doing.

Tool access control

Enable or disable individual tools per connector, so you decide what your agents can and cannot do.

Managed credentials

Glama handles OAuth flows, token storage, and automatic rotation, so credentials never expire on your clients.

Usage analytics

See which tools your agents call, how often, and when, so you can understand usage patterns and catch anomalies.

100% free. Your data is private.

Tool Definition Quality

Score is being calculated. Check back soon.

Available Tools

4 tools
find_alternativesFind neutral alternatives in the same categoryAInspect

Given a product, return other products in the SAME category from the catalog, listed neutrally (alphabetical, never ranked). This is discovery, not a recommendation — the personal best-fit and price-tiered alternatives live in the app.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
queryYesThe product to find alternatives for.
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. Discloses that results are alphabetical, never ranked, and that it's discovery. Could mention handling of missing products or result limits, but adequate for a simple retrieval tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, front-loaded with purpose, no fluff. Every sentence adds value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given simple schema and no output schema, description covers behavior well: return other products in same category, alphabetical, not ranked. Could mention whether it excludes the input product itself, but overall complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with description for the single parameter. Description adds that the tool finds products in the same category, which adds meaning beyond the schema's 'The product to find alternatives for.'

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states verb (return), resource (other products in the same category), and adds nuance (alphabetical, not ranked). Differentiates from sibling tools like search_products and personal best-fit alternatives in the app.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly notes that this is for discovery, not recommendation, and that personal best-fit alternatives live in the app. Provides when-not-to-use context but does not name specific sibling tools as alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

list_brandsList the brands coveredInspect

List the dermacosmetic brands covered in MHS BLOOM's reference, with how many products each has.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No parameters

lookup_productLook up a skincare productInspect

Identify a dermacosmetic product in MHS BLOOM's neutral reference and return its descriptive facts (brand, key ingredients, the concerns it's oriented toward, texture, fragrance, price band, who it's aimed at) plus a link to its reference page. Descriptive only — not a personal skin verdict.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
queryYesProduct name and/or brand, e.g. "CeraVe foaming cleanser".
search_productsSearch products by ingredient / concern / category / brandInspect

Search MHS BLOOM's reference for products by any of: key ingredient (e.g. "niacinamide"), skin concern (e.g. "blemishes"), category (e.g. "sunscreen"), brand, and/or fragrance_free. Returns a neutral, alphabetical list with reference links. Never ranked or rated.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
brandNo
limitNoMax results (default 15, max 40).
concernNo
categoryNo
ingredientNo
fragrance_freeNo

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Try in Browser

Your Connectors

Sign in to create a connector for this server.

Resources