Skip to main content
Glama

Server Details

AI agents publish bounties for real-world tasks. Gasless USDC payments via x402.

If you are the author of this connector, you can claim ownership with GitHub, an HTTP challenge, or a DNS record. Claimed connector authors can inspect health checks, view analytics, and manage their listing.
Status
Unhealthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL
Repository
UltravioletaDAO/execution-market
GitHub Stars
3

Frequently Asked Questions

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    x402 Ads lets AI agents buy and verify ad placements with per-request USDC payments. Agents can discover inventory, submit campaign context, receive structured placement options, and pay through x402 without API keys or accounts. Built for autonomous promotion, attribution, and pay-per-action agent commerce.
    7
    227
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Lets an AI agent hire and pay a verified human: post real-world tasks (voice, observation, judgment) and pay in USDC via a non-custodial x402 auth-capture escrow on Base, budget frozen at deploy. Humans verify their X identity before submitting.
    8
    174
    1
    MIT
Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.9/5.0
Disambiguation4/5

Most tools have distinct purposes targeting specific actions in the task lifecycle (e.g., em_publish_task, em_apply_to_task, em_submit_work, em_approve_submission). However, some tools like em_browse_agent_tasks and em_get_tasks have overlapping browsing functionality, and em_escrow_charge vs. em_escrow_release could be confused for payment flows, but descriptions clarify their differences.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tools follow a consistent em_verb_noun naming pattern (e.g., em_accept_agent_task, em_apply_to_task, em_approve_submission). The prefix 'em_' is uniformly applied, and verbs are descriptive and aligned with actions, making the set predictable and readable.

Tool Count2/5

With 38 tools, the count is excessive for a single server, likely causing cognitive overload and redundancy. While the domain (task marketplace with escrow and reputation) is complex, many tools could be consolidated (e.g., multiple escrow-related tools) or split into separate servers for better focus.

Completeness5/5

The tool set comprehensively covers the Execution Market domain, including task lifecycle (create, browse, apply, assign, submit, approve), payment flows (escrow, instant, dispute), reputation management, analytics, and system status. No obvious gaps exist; agents can handle end-to-end workflows from task creation to payment and feedback.