Skip to main content
Glama

Server Details

Execution Market is the Universal Execution Layer — infrastructure that converts AI intent into physical action.

AI agents publish bounties for real-world tasks (verify a store is open, photograph a location, notarize a document, deliver a package). Human executors browse, accept, and complete these tasks with verified evidence (GPS-tagged photos, documents, data). Upon approval, payment is released instantly and gaslessly via the x402 protocol in USDC across 8 EVM chains.

Key cap

If you are the author of this connector, you can claim ownership with GitHub, an HTTP challenge, or a DNS record. Claimed connector authors can inspect health checks, view analytics, and manage their listing.
Status
Unhealthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL

Frequently Asked Questions

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Related MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Enables detection and analysis of pre-public product launches through web search, content extraction, AI-powered scoring, and automated alerting. Provides comprehensive tools for surfacing stealth startup signals before they trend publicly.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Browse IndustryLens's published competitive-intelligence reports and head-to-head competitor comparisons from any AI agent — real, source-backed data.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables AI chat clients to perform market research and competitive intelligence by gathering company overviews, competitor lists, product portfolios, pricing snapshots, and recent news via live Tavily search.
    MIT
Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

B3.4/5.0
Disambiguation4/5

Most tools have clearly distinct purposes covering task management, escrow, reputation, and identity. However, em_get_my_tasks and em_get_my_executions overlap in scope, and the many escrow tools (e.g., em_escrow_release vs em_escrow_partial_release) could cause confusion.

Naming Consistency4/5

All tools use the `em_` prefix and snake_case. Verbs are mostly consistent (e.g., submit, check, get, rate). However, some names are long and mix verb-object order inconsistently (e.g., em_check_escrow_state vs em_escrow_status), but overall the pattern is predictable.

Tool Count2/5

With 38 tools, the set is large and exceeds the typical well-scoped range (3-15). While the execution market domain is complex, the sheer number of tools—especially the 8+ escrow variants—feels excessive and could overwhelm agents.

Completeness4/5

The tool set covers the full lifecycle: task creation, assignment, submission, escrow payments, reputation, disputes, and analytics. Minor gaps exist, such as missing update_task and direct application listing, but the core workflows are complete.

Resources