City24.lv - Real Estate marketplace
Server Details
Live Latvia real estate listings with search, geo filters, and property metadata.
- Status
- Healthy
- Last Tested
- Transport
- Streamable HTTP
- URL
Available Tools
1 toolsearch-listingsAInspect
Search real estate listings by property type, transaction type, price range, area, floor, lot size, and location. Use locationName for the most specific known location (e.g., street, district, or city). Some filters apply only to certain property types: floor filters are for apartments, and lot area filters are for houses or land.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| areaMax | No | Maximum area in square meters | |
| areaMin | No | Minimum area in square meters | |
| floorMax | No | Maximum floor | |
| floorMin | No | Minimum floor | |
| priceMax | No | Maximum price | |
| priceMin | No | Minimum price | |
| unitType | Yes | The type of property | |
| roomCount | No | Number of rooms | |
| lotAreaMax | No | Maximum lot area in square meters | |
| lotAreaMin | No | Minimum lot area in square meters | |
| projectType | No | Building/project type (series) | |
| locationName | No | Target location at the lowest available level (e.g., street, district, or city) | |
| transactionType | Yes | The type of transaction |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description carries the burden of behavioral disclosure. It adds useful detail about filter applicability, but it does not mention return format, pagination, sorting, authentication, or any side effects. For a search tool, the core behavior is implied, but important operational traits like result limits or default ordering are absent, leaving a moderate transparency gap.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is two sentences and efficiently front-loads the core purpose before providing targeted usage hints. Every word earns its place; there is no fluff or redundancy. The structure clearly separates what the tool does from how to use specific parameters.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given 13 parameters and no output schema, the description does a solid job of covering key usage nuance, particularly filter-to-property-type constraints. However, it omits details about result behavior (e.g., pagination, ordering, default limits) that an agent might need to set expectations. It is complete enough for a straightforward search but not fully exhaustive.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema covers 100% of parameters with descriptions, so the baseline is 3. The description adds meaningful semantics beyond the schema by explaining how to use locationName (choose the most specific known location) and which property types support floor vs. lot area filters. This extra guidance enhances parameter understanding, so a 4 is warranted.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool's function: 'Search real estate listings by property type, transaction type, price range, area, floor, lot size, and location.' It uses a specific verb ('Search') and a specific resource ('real estate listings'), and enumerates the main filter dimensions, making the purpose unmistakable even without sibling comparisons.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides practical usage guidance, notably: 'Use locationName for the most specific known location (e.g., street, district, or city)' and explains which filters apply to which property types ('floor filters are for apartments, and lot area filters are for houses or land'). It lacks explicit alternatives because no sibling tools are provided, but it clearly indicates when and how to use the tool and its filters.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
1 tool update
- First observed
search-listings
Frequently Asked Questions
Claiming proves that you control a remote MCP connector. It does not move, proxy, or interrupt the server.
Open the connector listing, choose Claim ownership, and sign in to Glama.
Complete one verification method:
GitHub identity — fastest for official registry listings. For a namespace such as
io.github.alice/server, link the matching GitHub user, then choose Claim with GitHub. An organization namespace such asio.github.acme/serveralso needs that organization to have installed the Glama AI GitHub App and approved its permissions, because GitHub discloses organization membership only to apps it has installed. Use HTTP or DNS when it has not.HTTP challenge — works when you can deploy a public file. Generate a token, publish the exact JSON Glama shows at
/.well-known/glama.jsonon the same origin as the connector, then choose Check HTTP challenge.DNS challenge — works when you control DNS but cannot change the server. Generate a token, create the exact TXT record Glama shows, wait for it to propagate, then choose Check DNS challenge.
After verification, Glama sends a confirmation email and gives you access to listing details, thumbnails, health checks, and analytics. Keep the HTTP file or DNS record in place: Glama periodically checks it and ownership remains verified while the token is discoverable.
The HTTP ownership file has this structure:
{
"$schema": "https://glama.ai/mcp/schemas/connector.json",
"claim": "glama_claim_..."
}Claim tokens are opaque, stable, and bound to the signed-in Glama account. They contain no email address or other personal information. If Glama can no longer discover a verified HTTP or DNS token, it starts a seven-day grace period before removing claim-based access. Restore the same token during that period to keep ownership verified. Never publish an email address, Glama session token, GitHub token, or connector credential as ownership proof.
If verification fails, confirm that you copied the current token exactly. The HTTP file must be public, return valid JSON with a successful HTTP response, and stay on the connector's origin. DNS changes may need more time to propagate. A claim cannot transfer to a different origin or hostname: if the connector target changes, Glama starts the grace period and the new target must be claimed separately after the previous claim is released.
For a connector linked to the official MCP Registry, registry updates continue to replace its name, description, and URL by default. After claiming, open Manage connector and enable Use Glama listing details as the source of truth if edits made on Glama should be preserved. Categories and thumbnails are always managed on Glama; registry linkage and technical connection settings continue to sync.
Control your server's listing on Glama, including description and metadata
Access analytics and receive server usage reports
Get monitoring and health status updates for your server
Feature your server to boost visibility and reach more users
To improve your MCP server's ranking:
Claim ownership of the server listing
Complete the server profile with an accurate description and thumbnail
Provide a test profile so Glama can connect to and evaluate the server
Keep tool definitions clear and complete to earn a high Tool Definition Quality Score (TDQS)
Route real usage through the Glama Gateway; more recorded successful server uses also improve the ranking
For users:
Full audit trail – every tool call is logged with inputs and outputs for compliance and debugging
Granular tool control – enable or disable individual tools per connector to limit what your AI agents can do
Centralized credential management – store and rotate API keys and OAuth tokens in one place
Change alerts – get notified when a connector changes its schema, adds or removes tools, or updates tool definitions, so nothing breaks silently
For server owners:
Proven adoption – public usage metrics on your listing show real-world traction and build trust with prospective users
Tool-level analytics – see which tools are being used most, helping you prioritize development and documentation
Direct user feedback – users can report issues and suggest improvements through the listing, giving you a channel you would not have otherwise
The connector status is unhealthy when Glama is unable to successfully connect to the server. This can happen for several reasons:
The server is experiencing an outage
The URL of the server is wrong
Credentials required to access the server are missing or invalid
If you are the owner of this MCP connector and would like to make modifications to the listing, including providing test credentials for accessing the server, please contact support@glama.ai.
Discussions
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!
Related MCP Connectors
Live Estonia real estate listings with search, geo filters, and property metadata.
Latvian property portal: search rentals, sales & nightly stays; market stats; owner tools via OAuth.
GDPR-clean property listings, rents, price stats, yields and below-market deals. UK, EU.
1AI-native real estate discovery with structured property search and market intelligence.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables querying livo.ge real estate listings through MCP, including search, listing details, geo lookups, reference dictionaries, and new development projects.7MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables searching and browsing ss.ge real estate listings with filters, counters, full card details, and geo/city data via MCP tools.MIT

cenogram-mcp-serverofficial
AlicenseAqualityCmaintenance7M+ real estate transactions from Poland's RCN registry. Search, compare, and analyze prices231041MIT- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables structured real estate workflows including property search, agent/client management, market intelligence, mortgage calculations, valuation, investment analysis, and document ingestion, with offline-first capabilities and optional live data integrations.AGPL 3.0
Glama MCP Gateway
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
TDQS
With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusing it with others. The tool's purpose is clearly described.
The single tool name follows a clear verb_noun pattern ('search-listings'), which is consistent and readable.
A single tool feels thin for a real estate marketplace, but the search tool is comprehensive in its filtering capabilities. It is within the borderline range.
The server only supports searching listings, with no way to retrieve full details for a specific listing, manage favorites, or contact sellers. This is a severe gap for a real estate marketplace.