Skip to main content
Glama
Ownership verified

Server Details

Publish complete HTML artifacts and return a public share URL.

Status
Healthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL

Glama MCP Gateway

Connect through Glama MCP Gateway for full control over tool access and complete visibility into every call.

MCP client
Glama
MCP server

Full call logging

Every tool call is logged with complete inputs and outputs, so you can debug issues and audit what your agents are doing.

Tool access control

Enable or disable individual tools per connector, so you decide what your agents can and cannot do.

Managed credentials

Glama handles OAuth flows, token storage, and automatic rotation, so credentials never expire on your clients.

Usage analytics

See which tools your agents call, how often, and when, so you can understand usage patterns and catch anomalies.

100% free. Your data is private.
Tool DescriptionsA

Average 3.7/5 across 1 of 1 tools scored.

Server CoherenceA
Disambiguation5/5

With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion or overlap. The tool's purpose is clearly defined.

Naming Consistency5/5

The single tool follows a clear verb_noun pattern (publish_html). No inconsistencies exist.

Tool Count3/5

One tool is minimal for a server, but for a focused utility that only publishes HTML and returns a URL, it is borderline acceptable. However, it feels slightly thin for a typical MCP server.

Completeness3/5

The tool covers its stated purpose of publishing HTML, but lacks complementary operations like deleting or listing published URLs, leading to a notable gap in lifecycle management.

Available Tools

1 tool
publish_htmlAInspect

Publish raw HTML unchanged and return a short public share URL.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
htmlYesThe raw HTML document to publish.
titleNoOptional human-readable title for metadata.
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It states HTML is published 'unchanged', which is a key behavioral trait. However, it does not disclose potential limitations (e.g., size limits, auth requirements, or error handling).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no wasted words. It efficiently conveys the core functionality.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given low complexity (2 params, no output schema, no annotations), the description is minimally complete. It explains the purpose and key outcome, but omits details like return format or constraints, which could be helpful.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema; it does not elaborate on the 'html' or 'title' parameters beyond what is already in the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('publish'), resource ('raw HTML'), and outcome ('return a short public share URL'). It is specific and unambiguous, with no sibling tools to differentiate from.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidelines on when to use this tool versus alternatives, but there are no siblings. The description implies it is for publishing HTML as-is, but lacks contextual cues like prerequisites or typical use cases.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Try in Browser

Your Connectors

Sign in to create a connector for this server.

Resources