Skip to main content
Glama

Server Details

Self-hostable team wiki; agents read & write it via MCP; Atlas turns your repo into a cited wiki.

Ownership verified
Status
Unhealthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL
Repository
zcag/tela
GitHub Stars
58
Server Listing
tela

Frequently Asked Questions

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    A machine-local, agent-writable knowledge base MCP server that lets coding agents autonomously record and retrieve hard-won operational facts, incidents, and corrections as markdown pages in a git repo, with provenance, talk pages, and search.
    116
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    MCP server that gives AI coding agents a git-backed markdown wiki to read and update, enabling search, read, write, verify, ingest, promote, and lint operations on versioned knowledge documents with schema validation, staleness tracking, and contradiction detection.
    3
    MIT
  • F
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Self-hosted enterprise knowledge hub that compiles organizational docs into a structured wiki and serves it to AI clients via MCP with fine-grained access control.
    1
    1,254
    -
Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4.3/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

Each tool targets a distinct operation or resource (e.g., pages, spaces, decks, sheets, atlas). Similar actions like search vs. research vs. find_overlaps are clearly differentiated by purpose and description. No significant overlap.

Naming Consistency4/5

Most tools follow verb_noun pattern (create_page, delete_page, list_spaces). Minor inconsistencies: edit_sheet vs. update_page, and the atlas_ prefix is a module marker but breaks the pattern slightly. snake_case is used consistently.

Tool Count4/5

41 tools is high but each covers a distinct feature (pages, spaces, comments, attachments, decks, sheets, atlas, search, research, etc.). The count reflects a rich feature set; no obvious bloat.

Completeness4/5

CRUD for pages, spaces, attachments, shares, and comments is covered. Deck/sheet authoring and preview are included. Missing user/org management and revision history, but core wiki workflows are complete.