Skip to main content
Glama

Server Details

特許まる — 発明を入れるだけで特許性の事前診断・明細書骨子・新規性喪失(特許法30条)判定。本人/弁理士の出願支援(代理しない)。

Status
Healthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL

Glama MCP Gateway

Connect through Glama MCP Gateway for full control over tool access and complete visibility into every call.

MCP client
Glama
MCP server

Full call logging

Every tool call is logged with complete inputs and outputs, so you can debug issues and audit what your agents are doing.

Tool access control

Enable or disable individual tools per connector, so you decide what your agents can and cannot do.

Managed credentials

Glama handles OAuth flows, token storage, and automatic rotation, so credentials never expire on your clients.

Usage analytics

See which tools your agents call, how often, and when, so you can understand usage patterns and catch anomalies.

100% free. Your data is private.
Tool DescriptionsC

Average 3.1/5 across 3 of 3 tools scored. Lowest: 2.4/5.

Server CoherenceA
Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: analyzing patentability, checking legal requirements, and drafting patent specifications. No overlap in functionality.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tools follow a consistent 'tokkyo_verb' pattern (analyze, check, draft), making it easy to infer their actions.

Tool Count4/5

Three tools is appropriate for a focused patent assistant covering analysis, checking, and drafting. Slightly limited but sufficient for the stated domain.

Completeness4/5

Covers the key workflow stages (diagnose, check, draft). Missing a dedicated prior art search tool, but the analyze tool provides search queries, so the gap is minor.

Available Tools

3 tools
tokkyo_analyzeInspect

発明(名称・技術分野・課題・解決手段・技術事実)を渡すと、特許性を事前診断する。IPC候補・新規性喪失(特許法30条)・記載要件・発明適格性・進歩性を◯△✕で自己診断し、先行技術調査の角度とクエリも返す。代理出願はしない(本人/弁理士支援)。最終判断は弁理士。

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
ipcNo
factsNo実装事実・数値・手順(実施可能要件の裏付け)
fieldNo技術分野
titleYes発明の名称
todayNo判定基準日 YYYY-MM-DD(30条の残余月数計算に使用)
problemNo解決しようとする課題
categoryNosoftware | chem | other
priorArtNo[{id, title, threat:高/中/低}]
solutionNo課題を解決するための手段(=独立項の要旨)
claimCoresNo独立項の核 [{kind:装置/方法/プログラム/組成物/製造方法/用途/システム, core:限定文}]
disclosuresNo自己公開歴 [{where, date:YYYY-MM-DD}](新規性喪失判定用)
tokkyo_checkInspect

tokkyo.json を渡すと、新規性喪失(特許法30条)・記載要件(サポート/実施可能)・発明適格性・進歩性を、その場で決定論的に◯△✕判定する。bim.house の houki_check(建築基準法その場判定)の特許版。登録可否の法的確定ではない(最終は弁理士)。

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
factsNo
titleYes
todayNo
categoryNo
priorArtNo
claimCoresNo
disclosuresNo
tokkyo_draftInspect

発明から、特許明細書一式の骨子(tokkyo.json正本+特許請求の範囲+明細書セクション+要約)を決定論生成して返す。bim.house の bim.json/商標まるの shohyo.json に相当。tokkyo_check も同梱。

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
ipcNo
factsNo
fieldNo
titleYes
todayNo
problemNo
categoryNo
priorArtNo
solutionNo
applicantNo
claimCoresNo
disclosuresNo

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Try in Browser

Your Connectors

Sign in to create a connector for this server.

Resources