Skip to main content
Glama

Server Details

Publish HTML, Markdown, PDF, or images as instant shareable links with expiry and passwords.

Status
Healthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL
Repository
vin-spiegel/htmldrop
GitHub Stars
9
Server Listing
htmldrop

Glama MCP Gateway

Connect through Glama MCP Gateway for full control over tool access and complete visibility into every call.

MCP client
Glama
MCP server

Full call logging

Every tool call is logged with complete inputs and outputs, so you can debug issues and audit what your agents are doing.

Tool access control

Enable or disable individual tools per connector, so you decide what your agents can and cannot do.

Managed credentials

Glama handles OAuth flows, token storage, and automatic rotation, so credentials never expire on your clients.

Usage analytics

See which tools your agents call, how often, and when, so you can understand usage patterns and catch anomalies.

100% free. Your data is private.
Tool DescriptionsA

Average 4.4/5 across 1 of 1 tools scored.

Server CoherenceA
Disambiguation5/5

With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion or overlap.

Naming Consistency5/5

A single tool trivially follows its own naming pattern; there is no inconsistency.

Tool Count3/5

The server has a focused purpose but only one tool; while a simple publish action is plausible, a full service would typically include management operations.

Completeness2/5

The server only supports publishing, with no tools for listing, updating, or deleting published documents, which are significant gaps for a document-sharing service.

Available Tools

1 tool
publish_htmlAInspect

Publish an HTML or markdown artifact (or fetch a remote HTML page) and get a shareable URL. Markdown is rendered into a clean reader page. Useful for sharing reports, dashboards, visualizations, or any document produced by an agent.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
urlNoURL of an HTML page to fetch and publish. Provide one of html, markdown, or url.
htmlNoHTML content to publish. Provide one of html, markdown, or url.
titleNoOptional page title for the published artifact.
markdownNoMarkdown content to publish; rendered into a styled reader page. Provide one of html, markdown, or url.
passwordNoOptional password protection for the artifact.
ttl_daysNoOptional custom TTL in days. Anonymous tier defaults to 7 days.
owner_keyNoOptional owner key for higher limits and ownership.
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Without annotations, the description carries the burden. It discloses that the tool publishes content and returns a shareable URL, and that markdown is rendered. It does not mention destructive actions, rate limits, or error handling, but the behavior is straightforward for a creation tool. The schema provides additional details like optional password and TTL.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two concise sentences, front-loaded with the primary action and outcome, followed by usage examples. No extraneous information; every sentence earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 7 parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description covers the main functionality and common use cases. It could elaborate on error scenarios or the format of the returned URL, but it is sufficiently complete for a simple publish tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description adds meaningful context: it explains that markdown is rendered into a clean reader page and that fetching a remote URL is supported. This goes beyond the schema's property descriptions, justifying an above-baseline score.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'publish' and the resources (HTML, markdown, URL) with a specific outcome ('get a shareable URL'). It also clarifies that markdown is rendered into a clean reader page, distinguishing the input types. With no sibling tools, this fully defines the tool's purpose.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides explicit usage context ('useful for sharing reports, dashboards, visualizations, or any document produced by an agent'), which helps an agent understand when to invoke it. However, it lacks explicit when-not-to-use guidance or alternatives, though no siblings exist to compare.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Try in Browser

Your Connectors

Sign in to create a connector for this server.