Skip to main content
Glama

Server Details

Cloud-hosted MCP server for URnetwork VPN and Proxy

Status
Unhealthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL

Glama MCP Gateway

Connect through Glama MCP Gateway for full control over tool access and complete visibility into every call.

MCP client
Glama
MCP server

Full call logging

Every tool call is logged with complete inputs and outputs, so you can debug issues and audit what your agents are doing.

Tool access control

Enable or disable individual tools per connector, so you decide what your agents can and cannot do.

Managed credentials

Glama handles OAuth flows, token storage, and automatic rotation, so credentials never expire on your clients.

Usage analytics

See which tools your agents call, how often, and when, so you can understand usage patterns and catch anomalies.

100% free. Your data is private.
Tool DescriptionsB

Average 3.1/5 across 1 of 1 tools scored.

Server CoherenceA
Disambiguation5/5

Only one tool exists, so there is no possibility of confusing it with another tool. The purpose is clearly described.

Naming Consistency5/5

The single tool name 'providerLocations' follows a clear camelCase convention, and with only one tool, the naming is inherently consistent.

Tool Count4/5

A single tool is appropriate for the narrow purpose of fetching provider locations, though the server feels minimal. It does not exceed or fall short of its stated scope.

Completeness5/5

The tool fully covers its domain: retrieving available provider locations. There are no missing CRUD operations because the domain is a simple read-only query.

Available Tools

1 tool
providerLocationsBInspect

Get available URnetwork VPN provider locations

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
queryYesLocation name to search for (e.g. 'New York', 'Tokyo', 'US East'). Supports fuzzy matching. An empty query returns a list of available countries.
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations present, the description must bear the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It only says 'Get available ... locations' with no details about return structure, potential errors, rate limits, or whether the operation is read-only. The query behavior (fuzzy matching, empty query semantics) is only in the schema, not the description.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence that communicates the essential purpose without wasted words. It is appropriately sized for a simple lookup tool.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple read-only lookup with one parameter and a fully documented schema, this is minimally complete. However, with no output schema and no mention of response format or pagination, an agent might not know exactly what to expect beyond 'locations'. It is adequate but leaves some gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema provides 100% coverage of the parameter 'query', including examples and behavior like fuzzy matching and empty query semantics. The description adds no parameter-level detail, so the schema carries the load. Baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action and resource: 'Get available URnetwork VPN provider locations'. It uses a specific verb ('Get') and names the resource, but does not differentiate from sibling tools because none are provided. The purpose is unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives, as there are no sibling tools listed. The description does not explain what kinds of queries are appropriate or when to use an empty query. The only usage context comes from the parameter schema, not the description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Related MCP Servers

View all MCP Servers

Try in Browser

Your Connectors

Sign in to create a connector for this server.

Resources