Blinka Machine Mouths

The Python tools (code_signal_python, code_review_python, debug_python_error) and the failed-run tools (rescue_signal, recover_workflow, rescue_workflow_pro) form tiered families whose boundaries depend mainly on price and depth rather than distinct purpose, so an agent could easily misselect. The descriptions do explain the tiering and price differences, which helps somewhat, but several tools remain plausibly interchangeable at the margins.

Names are all snake_case and readable, but the ordering convention is inconsistent: some are topic_action (code_review_python, rescue_signal, procurement_catalog) while others are action_topic or noun_verb_noun (recover_workflow, structure_json, acceptance_check_delivery, validate_procurement_request). There is a loose pattern but no single predictable verb_noun scheme.

Ten tools is a reasonable size for a paid service catalog spanning code analysis, workflow rescue, procurement, and JSON structuring. The count is slightly inflated by tiered variants (signal/review/pro) that could arguably be parameters, but nothing feels gratuitous overall.

The surface covers discovery (procurement_catalog), procurement validation, several analysis/recovery services, and an acceptance check, which is a coherent lifecycle for a service marketplace. Minor gaps exist (no explicit payment/settlement or generic non-Python review tool), but core workflows are addressable.