ParquetHarmonize
Server Details
Harmonize Parquet schemas; ordinary unions are free, residual reconciliation is x402-gated.
- Status
- Healthy
- Last Tested
- Transport
- Streamable HTTP
- URL
Available Tools
1 toolharmonize_parquetParquetHarmonizeAInspect
Harmonize 2-8 base64-encoded Parquet files. Ordinary compatible unions are free. Residual schema reconciliation requires an x402 payment of 0.03 USDC on Base.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| files_base64 | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It usefully discloses the x402 payment requirement of 0.03 USDC on Base for residual schema reconciliation and notes that compatible unions are free. However, it does not disclose return-value behavior, side effects, or whether the payment is initiated automatically, leaving some behavioral uncertainty.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two tight sentences with no filler. The core purpose is front-loaded, and the key constraints and payment condition are expressed efficiently.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The description covers the main input constraints and the cost/free distinction, which is essential for a tool that may require payment. However, it omits the return format, error behavior for invalid input or more than 8 files, and how the x402 payment is executed, leaving some gaps an agent would need to infer.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema provides only a bare files_base64 string array with no parameter descriptions, so schema coverage is 0%. The description compensates by specifying that the array must contain 2-8 base64-encoded Parquet files, adding meaning well beyond the schema. It does not detail size limits or encoding edge cases, but for a single-parameter tool this is adequate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses a specific verb 'Harmonize' with a clear resource: 2-8 base64-encoded Parquet files. It further clarifies the operation by distinguishing free compatible unions from paid residual schema reconciliation, so an agent can tell what the tool does even without sibling references.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The use case is clearly implied: use this when you need to harmonize or union multiple Parquet files. It also provides a decision-relevant distinction between free compatible unions and paid reconciliation, though it does not explicitly name exclusions or alternative tools.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
1 tool update
- First observed
harmonize_parquet
Frequently Asked Questions
Claiming proves that you control a remote MCP connector. It does not move, proxy, or interrupt the server.
Open the connector listing, choose Claim ownership, and sign in to Glama.
Complete one verification method:
GitHub identity — fastest for official registry listings. For a namespace such as
io.github.alice/server, link the matching GitHub user, then choose Claim with GitHub. An organization namespace such asio.github.acme/serveralso needs that organization to have installed the Glama AI GitHub App and approved its permissions, because GitHub discloses organization membership only to apps it has installed. Use HTTP or DNS when it has not.HTTP challenge — works when you can deploy a public file. Generate a token, publish the exact JSON Glama shows at
/.well-known/glama.jsonon the same origin as the connector, then choose Check HTTP challenge.DNS challenge — works when you control DNS but cannot change the server. Generate a token, create the exact TXT record Glama shows, wait for it to propagate, then choose Check DNS challenge.
After verification, Glama sends a confirmation email and gives you access to listing details, thumbnails, health checks, and analytics. Keep the HTTP file or DNS record in place: Glama periodically checks it and ownership remains verified while the token is discoverable.
The HTTP ownership file has this structure:
{
"$schema": "https://glama.ai/mcp/schemas/connector.json",
"claim": "glama_claim_..."
}Claim tokens are opaque, stable, and bound to the signed-in Glama account. They contain no email address or other personal information. If Glama can no longer discover a verified HTTP or DNS token, it starts a seven-day grace period before removing claim-based access. Restore the same token during that period to keep ownership verified. Never publish an email address, Glama session token, GitHub token, or connector credential as ownership proof.
If verification fails, confirm that you copied the current token exactly. The HTTP file must be public, return valid JSON with a successful HTTP response, and stay on the connector's origin. DNS changes may need more time to propagate. A claim cannot transfer to a different origin or hostname: if the connector target changes, Glama starts the grace period and the new target must be claimed separately after the previous claim is released.
For a connector linked to the official MCP Registry, registry updates continue to replace its name, description, and URL by default. After claiming, open Manage connector and enable Use Glama listing details as the source of truth if edits made on Glama should be preserved. Categories and thumbnails are always managed on Glama; registry linkage and technical connection settings continue to sync.
Control your server's listing on Glama, including description and metadata
Access analytics and receive server usage reports
Get monitoring and health status updates for your server
Feature your server to boost visibility and reach more users
To improve your MCP server's ranking:
Claim ownership of the server listing
Complete the server profile with an accurate description and thumbnail
Provide a test profile so Glama can connect to and evaluate the server
Keep tool definitions clear and complete to earn a high Tool Definition Quality Score (TDQS)
Route real usage through the Glama Gateway; more recorded successful server uses also improve the ranking
For users:
Full audit trail – every tool call is logged with inputs and outputs for compliance and debugging
Granular tool control – enable or disable individual tools per connector to limit what your AI agents can do
Centralized credential management – store and rotate API keys and OAuth tokens in one place
Change alerts – get notified when a connector changes its schema, adds or removes tools, or updates tool definitions, so nothing breaks silently
For server owners:
Proven adoption – public usage metrics on your listing show real-world traction and build trust with prospective users
Tool-level analytics – see which tools are being used most, helping you prioritize development and documentation
Direct user feedback – users can report issues and suggest improvements through the listing, giving you a channel you would not have otherwise
The connector status is unhealthy when Glama is unable to successfully connect to the server. This can happen for several reasons:
The server is experiencing an outage
The URL of the server is wrong
Credentials required to access the server are missing or invalid
If you are the owner of this MCP connector and would like to make modifications to the listing, including providing test credentials for accessing the server, please contact support@glama.ai.
Discussions
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!
Related MCP Connectors
Safely repairs JSON that fails a known schema. Deterministic only; refuses ambiguous repairs.
Production proofs for breaking JSON Schema/MCP changes; UNKNOWN/NO_WITNESS_FOUND not compatible.
Paid x402 tools: schema-change detection and x402 seller vetting. Interim hostname.
Repair malformed JSON from LLM/agent output; optional JSON Schema coercion. Free + x402 paid.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceProvides safe, deterministic inspection, transformation, validation, and diffing of structured data (JSON, CSV, YAML, Parquet) via schema-aware MCP tools.4Apache 2.0

terrabaseofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceLLM-assisted, safety-gated Postgres migrations exposed as an MCP server, using a deterministic rule engine over Postgres's own parser AST for safety enforcement, with two-phase approval and append-only audit ledger.Apache 2.0- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenancePaid remote MCP server that blocks breaking tool-schema changes by verifying schema drift, requiring approvals, and providing compatibility receipts and audit logs.-
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceDetects schema mismatches between data producers and consumers through static analysis, supporting extraction, comparison, code generation, and automated validation with watch mode for MCP tools, APIs, and service contracts.1128MIT
Glama MCP Gateway
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
TDQS
With only a single tool, there is no possibility of confusing it with another. The tool's name and description unambiguously specify its function.
The lone tool name follows a clear verb_noun pattern in snake_case. Despite having no other tools to compare against, the naming is consistent and predictable.
One tool feels thin for a server with a potentially complex operation like harmonization. It is borderline but acceptable for a narrowly focused single-purpose utility.
The tool fully covers the core action of harmonizing Parquet files. Minor gaps exist around pre-flight inspection or payment status tracking, but these are not essential to the stated purpose.