Autonomous AI microservices: 55 dynamic guardrails, contract audits & oracles via L402/x402/MPP.
Scored across 3 tools
The three tools map cleanly onto distinct phases of a gateway workflow: search (discover), schema lookup (inspect), and invocation (execute). There is no plausible overlap — an agent can tell exactly which one to call at each step, and the descriptions even state the intended ordering (discover → inspect → execute).
All three follow the same namespace-prefixed verb_noun convention (diogenes_discover_tools, diogenes_execute_tool, diogenes_inspect_tool). The only nit is the plural/singular mismatch on 'tools' vs 'tool', which is trivial and does not impede predictability.
Three tools is the minimal correct surface for a discover/inspect/execute meta-gateway fronting 121 microservices, and it avoids exploding the surface into 121 entries. It is slightly thin in that no tool exists for account or payment-state queries, but the core scope is well earned.
Discovery, schema inspection, and execution cover the primary lifecycle, but the payment dimension — a headline feature — is incomplete: there is no tool to check balance, poll a 402 challenge status, or retrieve a settlement receipt after supplying payment_proof. Inspect also caps at 5 tools per call with no pagination guidance, which will force repeated calls for larger result sets.
Search 121 deterministic edge microservices across 9 domain suites (gemini-suite, eve-frontier, web3-security, agent-guardrails, dev-utilities, neural-search-engine, data-pipeline, crypto-market, code-execution). Returns matching tool names, 1-line summaries, satoshi/USDC prices, and free-tier flags.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| query | No | Search keywords (e.g. 'solana risk', 'json heal', 'eve turret', 'guardrail', 'svg preview', 'ptb drain') | |
| domain | No | Optional filter by domain package. Defaults to 'all'. | |
| free_only | No | If true, returns only tools that can be executed with zero payment (free developer tier). |
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| tools | No | |
| total_matches | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, non-destructive and closed-world, so safety is covered. The description adds real value beyond that by disclosing the catalog size (121 tools), the domain partitioning, and exactly which fields come back (names, 1-line summaries, satoshi/USDC prices, free-tier flags), which tells the agent this is a cheap pre-flight lookup.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two sentences, front-loaded with the verb and scale, second sentence dedicated to return shape. No filler, and the domain list earns its place by conveying the breadth of coverage at a glance.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a three-optional-parameter read-only search with an output schema, the description covers purpose, scope and return fields adequately. It would be complete at 5 if it told the agent to call this before execute/inspect, but nothing required to invoke it correctly is missing.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% and the schema already documents query, domain (with full enum) and free_only, so the description adds little parameter meaning beyond repeating the domain suite names that already appear in the enum. Baseline 3 applies since the schema does the heavy lifting.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
States a specific verb ('Search') and resource ('121 deterministic edge microservices across 9 domain suites'), plus an enumerated list of domains and the shape of the results. An agent can tell this is a catalog/discovery operation rather than an execution or inspection one, though it never names diogenes_execute_tool or diogenes_inspect_tool to sharpen the distinction.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Usage is only implied — an agent is expected to infer that you call this first to find a tool before calling diogenes_execute_tool. There is no explicit 'use this when...' clause, no statement of when-not to use it, and no routing to the inspect/execute siblings.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Universally execute any of the 121 Diogenes edge microservices. Free-tier tools execute with zero payment. Paid tools execute when payment_proof is supplied, or return an HTTP 402 payment challenge with Lightning L402 invoice, Solana x402 address, Base MPP wallet, and Garlicoin 0-conf treasury for automated settlement.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| arguments | No | Arguments matching the tool's inputSchema retrieved via diogenes_inspect_tool. | |
| tool_name | Yes | Name of the tool to execute (e.g. 'solana_risk', 'malformed_json_healer', 'guardrail_verify', 'plan_eve_gate_route'). | |
| payment_proof | No | Optional payment proof for paid tools. Accepts: (1) L402 preimage hex, (2) Solana tx signature base58, (3) Base EVM tx hash 0x..., (4) Garlicoin txid 64-char hex, or (5) Diogenes session key. |
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| result | No | |
| status | No | |
| payment_challenge | No | Returned only on HTTP 402 when a paid tool is called without valid payment_proof. |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare openWorld, non-readOnly, non-idempotent behavior, so the description's value is the payment semantics it adds: the 402 challenge and the specific settlement rails returned. It stops short of describing failure modes beyond payment, side effects on the remote service, or whether executions are logged/repeatable.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two sentences, front-loaded with the core capability and followed by the payment condition. The enumeration of four payment rails is dense but each names a real settlement path; nothing is padded.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a universal dispatcher, the hardest thing an agent must know is the payment gate, and the description covers it precisely; return values are covered by the output schema and arguments by the schema field descriptions. Nothing essential to calling it correctly is missing.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% and the schema already enumerates accepted payment_proof formats and explains the arguments object. The description only adds the free-vs-paid gating context that determines whether payment_proof matters, so it earns the baseline 3 rather than more.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
States a specific verb and resource: execute any of the 121 Diogenes edge microservices. That is clearly distinct from the sibling verbs discover and inspect, although the description never explicitly says to resolve arguments via diogenes_inspect_tool first (only the schema's arguments field does).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Gives the key routing rule: free-tier tools run with no payment, paid tools require payment_proof or return a 402 challenge. It does not spell out the prerequisite workflow (discover -> inspect -> execute) or when execution rather than inspection is the right choice; that is left to the sibling names and schema.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Retrieve full JSON Schema definitions, input parameters, and usage instructions for up to 5 Diogenes tools. Call this after discovering tools to inspect exact parameter types before execution.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| tool_names | Yes | Array of up to 5 tool names discovered via diogenes_discover_tools (e.g. ['malformed_json_healer', 'solana_risk']). |
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| tools | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnly, idempotent, non-destructive, closed-world behavior, and an output schema exists. The description adds useful context beyond that: a hard batch cap of 5 tools and the fact that results include schemas, parameters, and usage instructions. It omits error behavior for unknown tool names.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two sentences with no filler, and the purpose plus the 'when to call' instruction is front-loaded in a single pass.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a one-parameter read tool with rich annotations and an output schema, the description covers what is needed to call it correctly. The only real gap is behavior when a requested tool name is invalid or unknown.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% and the single parameter is fully documented in the schema; the description's only added detail is restating the 'up to 5' cap. With the schema doing the heavy lifting, the baseline 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
States a specific verb and resource ('Retrieve full JSON Schema definitions, input parameters, and usage instructions') plus a scope limit ('up to 5 Diogenes tools'). This is clearly distinct from its siblings diogenes_discover_tools and diogenes_execute_tool.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Gives an explicit ordering rule: call after discovering tools and before execution to check exact parameter types. That effectively routes agents from discover → inspect → execute. It does not state exclusions or when to skip inspection (e.g. simple/no-arg tools), so it falls short of a full 5.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
diogenes_discover_tools1 field changedInput schema / properties / free_only / descriptionPrevious value: -"If true, returns only tools that can be executed with zero payment (loss-leader tier)."New value: +"If true, returns only tools that can be executed with zero payment (free developer tier)."analyze_ast_symbol_graphanalyze_media_sentimentanalyze_news_recencyanalyze_omni_multimodal_inputanalyze_query_planapply_fuzzy_code_patcharbitrate_agent_deliverable_escrowaudit_mcp_server_manifestaudit_module_dependency_cyclesaudit_outbound_egress_urlaudit_response_factualityaudit_smart_contract_codeaudit_sql_injection_astaudit_transaction_isolationcalculate_pool_headroomcalculate_spot_swap_rateclean_tabular_datasetcluster_topic_subgraphscompare_crosschain_bridge_routescompile_competitive_landscapecompile_mpp_research_dossiercompile_polyglot_type_schemascompile_research_dossiercompile_rss_feedcompile_xml_agent_promptcompose_lyria_music_trackconduct_deep_research_investigationcrawl_sitemap_urlsdecode_eip712_permit_signaturedetect_address_poisoning_scamdetect_agent_action_loopdetect_breaking_migrationsdetect_mcp_schema_rugpulldetect_openapi_breaking_changesdetect_paywall_and_bypassdiff_agent_memory_checkpointdiogenes_discover_toolsdiogenes_execute_tooldiogenes_inspect_toolenforce_json_schema_typesestimate_bitcoin_mempool_feesestimate_solana_priority_feesevaluate_ab_statistical_significanceevaluate_deterministic_mathevaluate_dex_mev_riskevaluate_seo_diagnosticsevaluate_solana_token_riskexecute_antigravity_agentexecute_python_sandboxexpand_search_queriesextract_clean_markdownextract_contact_infoextract_page_hyperlinksextract_scholarly_citationsextract_structured_json_entitiesextract_structured_metadatafilter_domain_intelligencegenerate_boundary_test_vectorsgenerate_gemini_completiongenerate_gemini_embeddingsgenerate_nano_banana_imagegenerate_orm_modelsgenerate_veo_cinematic_videogenerate_x402_vector_embeddingsheal_malformed_jsoninfer_mpp_streaming_sessioninspect_solana_token_liquidityisolate_css_selectorsisolate_stacktrace_root_causeoperate_computer_use_agentparse_html_tablesplan_bitcoin_utxo_consolidationplan_context_token_budgetplan_robotics_spatial_trajectoryprocess_live_audio_dialogueprune_context_skeletonrank_expert_sourcesrecommend_database_indexesredact_sensitive_piirerank_hybrid_rag_chunksroute_mcp_workflow_plansanitize_html_contentsanitize_sql_telemetrysanitize_tool_output_streamscan_solana_cpi_reentrancyschedule_critical_path_tasksscrape_readable_articlesearch_gemini_grounded_mapssearch_gemini_grounded_websimulate_evm_transaction_calldatasimulate_monte_carlo_risksummarize_technical_documentsummarize_temporal_timelinesynthesize_gemini_speech_audiosynthesize_neural_searchsynthesize_python_automation_codesynthesize_safe_regexsynthesize_seed_fixturessynthesize_sql_querysynthesize_web_intelligence_brieftrack_solana_whale_flowstranspile_sql_dialectvalidate_mcp_sampling_requestvalidate_schema_normalizationvalidate_sql_query_astverify_a2a_agent_cardverify_agent_command_safetyverify_context_compaction_fidelityverify_factual_claimsverify_http402_payment_challengeevaluate_solana_token_risk5 fields changedOutput schema / properties / reason_codesAdded value: +{
+ "description": "Programmatic risk verdicts and reason codes (e.g. REGULATED_STABLECOIN_FREEZE_AUTHORITY, TOKEN_2022_PERMANENT_DELEGATE).",
+ "items": {
+ "type": "string"
+ },
+ "type": "array"
+}Output schema / properties / slotAdded value: +{
+ "description": "Solana block slot at which the on-chain mint and authority state was verified.",
+ "type": "number"
+}Output schema / properties / token_2022_extensionsAdded value: +{
+ "description": "Detected Token-2022 extensions including permanent delegate, transfer hook, default frozen, and transfer fees.",
+ "properties": {
+ "default_account_frozen": {
+ "description": "True if new token accounts are initialized in frozen state by default.",
+ "type": "boolean"
+ },
+ "permanent_delegate_present": {
+ "description": "True if a Token-2022 permanent delegate can arbitrarily transfer or burn holder tokens.",
+ "type": "boolean"
+ },
+ "transfer_fee_active": {
+ "description": "True if transfer fee extension withholds tokens on transfer.",
+ "type": "boolean"
+ },
+ "transfer_hook_present": {
+ "description": "True if an external transfer hook program executes on every transfer.",
+ "type": "boolean"
+ }
+ },
+ "required": [
+ "permanent_delegate_present",
+ "transfer_hook_present",
+ "transfer_fee_active",
+ "default_account_frozen"
+ ],
+ "type": "object"
+}Output schema / properties / token_standardAdded value: +{
+ "description": "Identified Solana token program standard ('spl-token', 'token-2022', or 'native-sol').",
+ "type": "string"
+}Output schema / requiredPrevious value: -[
- "valid_base58",
- "risk_score",
- "should_transact",
- "freeze_authority_present"
-]New value: +[
+ "valid_base58",
+ "risk_score",
+ "should_transact",
+ "freeze_authority_present",
+ "reason_codes",
+ "slot",
+ "token_standard",
+ "token_2022_extensions"
+]analyze_ast_symbol_graph2 fields changedInput schema / properties / source_textAdded value: +{
+ "description": "Alias for code: source code file content to parse.",
+ "type": "string"
+}Input schema / requiredPrevious value: -[
- "source_text"
-]New value: +[
+ "code"
+]compile_mpp_research_dossier3 fields changedInput schema / properties / research_topicAdded value: +{
+ "description": "Alias for query: research topic or technical question to investigate.",
+ "type": "string"
+}Input schema / requiredPrevious value: -[
- "research_topic"
-]New value: +[
+ "query"
+]Output schema / requiredPrevious value: -[
- "search_prompt",
- "key_findings",
- "synthesis_quality_score",
- "sources_cited"
-]New value: +[
+ "query",
+ "key_findings",
+ "synthesis_quality_score",
+ "sources_cited"
+]evaluate_deterministic_math2 fields changedInput schema / properties / math_formulaAdded value: +{
+ "description": "Alias for expression: algebraic formula to evaluate.",
+ "type": "string"
+}Input schema / requiredPrevious value: -[
- "math_formula"
-]New value: +[
+ "expression"
+]analyze_media_sentimentanalyze_news_recencyanalyze_query_planaudit_sql_injection_astaudit_transaction_isolationcalculate_pool_headroomcluster_topic_subgraphscompile_competitive_landscapecompile_research_dossiercompile_rss_feedcrawl_sitemap_urlsdetect_breaking_migrationsdetect_paywall_and_bypassevaluate_seo_diagnosticsexpand_search_queriesextract_clean_markdownextract_contact_infoextract_page_hyperlinksextract_scholarly_citationsextract_structured_metadatafilter_domain_intelligencegenerate_orm_modelsisolate_css_selectorsparse_html_tablesrank_expert_sourcesrecommend_database_indexessanitize_html_contentsanitize_sql_telemetryscrape_readable_articlesummarize_temporal_timelinesynthesize_neural_searchsynthesize_seed_fixturessynthesize_sql_querytranspile_sql_dialectvalidate_schema_normalizationverify_factual_claimsanalyze_ast_symbol_graph1 field changedInput schema / requiredPrevious value: -[
- "code"
-]New value: +[
+ "source_text"
+]audit_outbound_egress_url3 fields changedInput schema / properties / destination_uriAdded value: +{
+ "description": "Outbound HTTP/HTTPS destination URI to inspect before fetching (e.g. 'https://api.example.com/v1/webhook').",
+ "type": "string"
+}Input schema / properties / target_urlRemoved value: -{
- "description": "Full outbound HTTP/HTTPS URL to inspect before fetching (e.g. 'https://api.example.com/v1/webhook').",
- "type": "string"
-}Input schema / requiredPrevious value: -[
- "target_url"
-]New value: +[
+ "destination_uri"
+]compile_mpp_research_dossier2 fields changedInput schema / requiredPrevious value: -[
- "query"
-]New value: +[
+ "research_topic"
+]Output schema / requiredPrevious value: -[
- "query",
- "key_findings",
- "synthesis_quality_score",
- "sources_cited"
-]New value: +[
+ "search_prompt",
+ "key_findings",
+ "synthesis_quality_score",
+ "sources_cited"
+]evaluate_deterministic_math1 field changedInput schema / requiredPrevious value: -[
- "expression"
-]New value: +[
+ "math_formula"
+]execute_python_sandbox3 fields changedInput schema / properties / codeRemoved value: -{
- "description": "Python 3 source code snippet to audit and execute in the isolated sandbox.",
- "type": "string"
-}Input schema / properties / python_scriptAdded value: +{
+ "description": "Python 3 source script to audit and execute strictly inside an isolated AST-governed, non-privileged WebAssembly sandbox with no host filesystem access.",
+ "type": "string"
+}Input schema / requiredPrevious value: -[
- "code"
-]New value: +[
+ "python_script"
+]rerank_hybrid_rag_chunks3 fields changedInput schema / properties / queryRemoved value: -{
- "description": "Technical search query or question used to score candidate chunks.",
- "type": "string"
-}Input schema / properties / search_promptAdded value: +{
+ "description": "Technical search prompt or question used to score candidate chunks.",
+ "type": "string"
+}Input schema / requiredPrevious value: -[
- "query",
- "documents_json"
-]New value: +[
+ "search_prompt",
+ "documents_json"
+]validate_sql_query_ast3 fields changedInput schema / properties / queryRemoved value: -{
- "description": "SQL query string to parse and validate (e.g. 'SELECT id, email FROM users WHERE active = 1').",
- "type": "string"
-}Input schema / properties / sql_statementAdded value: +{
+ "description": "SQL statement string to statically parse and audit for read-only SELECT compliance (e.g. 'SELECT id, email FROM users WHERE active = 1').",
+ "type": "string"
+}Input schema / requiredPrevious value: -[
- "query"
-]New value: +[
+ "sql_statement"
+]analyze_eve_killmail_threatsaudit_eve_tribe_standingscompile_eve_gate_aclfind_eve_ssu_arbitragegenerate_eve_assembly_moveinspect_eve_assembly_statemonitor_eve_constellation_fueloptimize_eve_node_powerplan_eve_gate_routeprioritize_eve_turret_targetsquote_eve_ssu_marketsimulate_eve_capacitor_siegesimulate_eve_sui_ptbverify_eve_zklogin_characteragent_context_compaction_verifieragent_hallucination_auditoragent_loop_circuit_breakeragent_mcp_manifest_auditoragent_mcp_routeragent_memory_checkpoint_diffagent_prompt_compileragent_schema_enforceragent_sql_guardai_antigravity_agentai_audio_liveai_code_genai_computer_useai_deep_researchai_embeddingsai_extractai_generateai_grounded_mapsai_grounded_searchai_image_genai_music_genai_omniai_roboticsai_summarizeai_ttsai_video_genanalyze_ast_symbol_graphanalyze_eve_killmail_threatsanalyze_omni_multimodal_inputapply_fuzzy_code_patcharbitrate_agent_deliverable_escrowaudit_eve_tribe_standingsaudit_mcp_server_manifestaudit_module_dependency_cyclesaudit_outbound_egress_urlaudit_response_factualityaudit_smart_contract_codecalculate_spot_swap_rateclean_dataclean_tabular_datasetcode_ast_symbol_graphcode_dependency_cycle_auditcode_fuzzy_diff_patchercode_polyglot_type_compilercode_sandboxcode_stacktrace_root_causecompare_crosschain_bridge_routescompile_eve_gate_aclcompile_mpp_research_dossiercompile_polyglot_type_schemascompile_xml_agent_promptcompose_lyria_music_trackconduct_deep_research_investigationcontext_hybrid_rerankercontext_smart_prunercontext_token_budget_plannercontract_auditcrypto_address_poisoning_checkcrypto_bridge_quotecrypto_eip712_permit_decodercrypto_utxo_consolidation_plannerdecode_eip712_permit_signaturedetect_address_poisoning_scamdetect_agent_action_loopdetect_mcp_schema_rugpulldetect_openapi_breaking_changesdiff_agent_memory_checkpointenforce_json_schema_typesestimate_bitcoin_mempool_feesestimate_solana_priority_feesevaluate_ab_statistical_significanceevaluate_deterministic_mathevaluate_dex_mev_riskevaluate_solana_token_riskeve_gate_route_plannereve_killmail_threat_inteleve_move_assembly_codereve_network_node_gj_optimizereve_sovereignty_fuel_radareve_ssu_market_makereve_sui_ptb_simulatoreve_turret_target_matrixeve_zklogin_character_verifierexecute_antigravity_agentexecute_python_sandboxextract_structured_json_entitiesfind_eve_ssu_arbitragegenerate_boundary_test_vectorsgenerate_eve_assembly_movegenerate_gemini_completiongenerate_gemini_embeddingsgenerate_nano_banana_imagegenerate_veo_cinematic_videogenerate_x402_vector_embeddingsguardrail_verifyheal_malformed_jsonhttp402_challenge_verifierinfer_mpp_streaming_sessioninspect_eve_assembly_stateinspect_solana_token_liquidityisolate_stacktrace_root_causejson_repairmcp_rugpull_diffmcp_sampling_guardmempool_feemev_riskmonitor_eve_constellation_fuelmpp_agent_escrow_arbitermpp_deep_searchmpp_session_inferoperate_computer_use_agentoptimize_eve_node_powerplan_bitcoin_utxo_consolidationplan_context_token_budgetplan_eve_gate_routeplan_robotics_spatial_trajectoryprioritize_eve_turret_targetsprocess_live_audio_dialogueprune_context_skeletonquote_eve_ssu_marketredact_sensitive_piiregex_oraclererank_hybrid_rag_chunksroute_mcp_workflow_plansanitize_tool_output_streamscan_solana_cpi_reentrancyschedule_critical_path_tasksscrub_piisearch_gemini_grounded_mapssearch_gemini_grounded_websimulate_eve_capacitor_siegesimulate_eve_sui_ptbsimulate_evm_transaction_calldatasimulate_monte_carlo_risksolana_risksolver_constraint_schedulersolver_deterministic_mathsolver_statistical_ab_judgesummarize_technical_documentswap_ratesynthesize_gemini_speech_audiosynthesize_python_automation_codesynthesize_safe_regexsynthesize_web_intelligence_brieftool_output_firewalltrack_solana_whale_flowsvalidate_mcp_sampling_requestvalidate_sql_query_astverify_a2a_agent_cardverify_agent_command_safetyverify_context_compaction_fidelityverify_eve_zklogin_characterverify_http402_payment_challengeweb_briefx402_embeddingsx402_solana_priority_fee_oraclex402_token_metax402_whale_radaragent_memory_checkpoint_diffcode_ast_symbol_graphcode_dependency_cycle_auditcode_fuzzy_diff_patchercode_polyglot_type_compilercode_stacktrace_root_causecontext_hybrid_rerankercontext_smart_prunercontext_token_budget_plannersolver_constraint_schedulersolver_deterministic_mathsolver_statistical_ab_judgeagent_context_compaction_verifieragent_hallucination_auditoragent_mcp_manifest_auditoragent_prompt_compileragent_sql_guardai_antigravity_agentai_audio_liveai_code_genai_computer_useai_deep_researchai_embeddingsai_extractai_generateai_grounded_mapsai_grounded_searchai_image_genai_music_genai_omniai_roboticsai_summarizeai_ttsai_video_genclean_datacrypto_address_poisoning_checkcrypto_eip712_permit_decodercrypto_utxo_consolidation_plannereve_killmail_threat_inteleve_sovereignty_fuel_radareve_ssu_market_makereve_turret_target_matrixeve_zklogin_character_verifiermempool_feempp_agent_escrow_arbitermpp_session_inferscrub_piiswap_ratex402_embeddingsx402_solana_priority_fee_oraclex402_token_metax402_whale_radaragent_loop_circuit_breakereve_sui_ptb_simulatorhttp402_challenge_verifiermcp_rugpull_diffmcp_sampling_guardtool_output_firewallagent_mcp_routeragent_schema_enforcercode_sandboxcontract_auditcrypto_bridge_quoteeve_gate_route_plannereve_move_assembly_codereve_network_node_gj_optimizerguardrail_verifyjson_repairmev_riskmpp_deep_searchregex_oraclesolana_riskweb_briefx402 layer for AI agents: 35 pay-per-call resources, x402 service discovery, USDG/USDC.
54 AI agent tools: OSINT, intel feeds, DeFi, crypto, weather, DNS, proxies. x402 micropayments.
Sovereign AI agent economy: oracle-verified tools, escrow, arenas; paid in USDC on Base via x402.
Autonomous AI agent selling pay-per-call skills settled with x402 micropayments (USDC).
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
