resumakeai-mcp
Server Details
Free ATS resume score and job-match checker: scores a resume against a job description.
- Status
- Healthy
- Last Tested
- Transport
- Streamable HTTP
- URL
- Repository
- sonnykatongola-ops/resumakeai-mcp
- GitHub Stars
- 0
Available Tools
1 toolscore_resumeScore a resume against a job descriptionAInspect
Scores a resume against a specific job description using ResuMakeAi (resumakeai.com). Returns an ATS parsing score (0-100), a job match percentage, missing skills, suggested keywords to add, and specific ATS formatting issues. Free, no account required. Use this whenever someone wants feedback on how well their resume matches a job posting, or whether it will parse correctly through applicant tracking software.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| resumeText | Yes | Plain text of the resume to score. | |
| jobDescription | Yes | Plain text of the job posting to score the resume against. |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries the behavioral burden. It discloses that the tool relies on an external service (resumakeai.com), that it is free with no account required, and it enumerates the exact result fields returned. It could mention data handling or failure behavior, but it covers the key behavioral facts.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is three sentences with no filler. The core action is front-loaded, the return values are compactly listed, and the usage guidance is appended without repetition. Every sentence earns its place.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given there is no output schema, the description correctly enumerates the expected return values (ATS score, match percentage, missing skills, keyword suggestions, formatting issues). It also covers cost and authentication. Minor omissions like failure modes or data-privacy caveats keep it from being fully complete, but it is sufficient for an agent to select and call the tool correctly.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, and each parameter already has a clear description ('Plain text of the resume to score', 'Plain text of the job posting to score the resume against'). The tool description adds no new parameter-level detail, so the baseline score of 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses a specific verb ('Scores') and identifies the exact resource ('a resume against a specific job description'). It clearly distinguishes the tool's function, names the external service (ResuMakeAi), and states the concrete outputs an agent can expect, leaving no ambiguity about what this tool does.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description explicitly says when to use the tool: whenever someone wants feedback on resume-job match or ATS parseworthiness. It does not provide exclusions or alternative tools, but since no siblings exist, the guidance is clear and actionable enough.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
1 tool update
- First observed
score_resume
Frequently Asked Questions
Claiming proves that you control a remote MCP connector. It does not move, proxy, or interrupt the server.
Open the connector listing, choose Claim ownership, and sign in to Glama.
Complete one verification method:
GitHub identity — fastest for official registry listings. For a namespace such as
io.github.alice/server, link the matching GitHub user, then choose Claim with GitHub. An organization namespace such asio.github.acme/serveralso needs that organization to have installed the Glama AI GitHub App and approved its permissions, because GitHub discloses organization membership only to apps it has installed. Use HTTP or DNS when it has not.HTTP challenge — works when you can deploy a public file. Generate a token, publish the exact JSON Glama shows at
/.well-known/glama.jsonon the same origin as the connector, then choose Check HTTP challenge.DNS challenge — works when you control DNS but cannot change the server. Generate a token, create the exact TXT record Glama shows, wait for it to propagate, then choose Check DNS challenge.
After verification, Glama sends a confirmation email and gives you access to listing details, thumbnails, health checks, and analytics. Keep the HTTP file or DNS record in place: Glama periodically checks it and ownership remains verified while the token is discoverable.
The HTTP ownership file has this structure:
{
"$schema": "https://glama.ai/mcp/schemas/connector.json",
"claim": "glama_claim_..."
}Claim tokens are opaque, stable, and bound to the signed-in Glama account. They contain no email address or other personal information. If Glama can no longer discover a verified HTTP or DNS token, it starts a seven-day grace period before removing claim-based access. Restore the same token during that period to keep ownership verified. Never publish an email address, Glama session token, GitHub token, or connector credential as ownership proof.
If verification fails, confirm that you copied the current token exactly. The HTTP file must be public, return valid JSON with a successful HTTP response, and stay on the connector's origin. DNS changes may need more time to propagate. A claim cannot transfer to a different origin or hostname: if the connector target changes, Glama starts the grace period and the new target must be claimed separately after the previous claim is released.
For a connector linked to the official MCP Registry, registry updates continue to replace its name, description, and URL by default. After claiming, open Manage connector and enable Use Glama listing details as the source of truth if edits made on Glama should be preserved. Categories and thumbnails are always managed on Glama; registry linkage and technical connection settings continue to sync.
Control your server's listing on Glama, including description and metadata
Access analytics and receive server usage reports
Get monitoring and health status updates for your server
Feature your server to boost visibility and reach more users
To improve your MCP server's ranking:
Claim ownership of the server listing
Complete the server profile with an accurate description and thumbnail
Provide a test profile so Glama can connect to and evaluate the server
Keep tool definitions clear and complete to earn a high Tool Definition Quality Score (TDQS)
Route real usage through the Glama Gateway; more recorded successful server uses also improve the ranking
For users:
Full audit trail – every tool call is logged with inputs and outputs for compliance and debugging
Granular tool control – enable or disable individual tools per connector to limit what your AI agents can do
Centralized credential management – store and rotate API keys and OAuth tokens in one place
Change alerts – get notified when a connector changes its schema, adds or removes tools, or updates tool definitions, so nothing breaks silently
For server owners:
Proven adoption – public usage metrics on your listing show real-world traction and build trust with prospective users
Tool-level analytics – see which tools are being used most, helping you prioritize development and documentation
Direct user feedback – users can report issues and suggest improvements through the listing, giving you a channel you would not have otherwise
The connector status is unhealthy when Glama is unable to successfully connect to the server. This can happen for several reasons:
The server is experiencing an outage
The URL of the server is wrong
Credentials required to access the server are missing or invalid
If you are the owner of this MCP connector and would like to make modifications to the listing, including providing test credentials for accessing the server, please contact support@glama.ai.
Discussions
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!
Related MCP Connectors
Score and tailor your CV/resume against a job posting — for AI agents and humans, no-login trial.
A job-search companion: tailor your CV to a role, score fit, fix ATS issues. Also via MCP.
ATS resume scoring, job analysis, interview prep, and auto-apply that verifies each submission.
Analyze job listings against your resume, track applications, and generate cover letters.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceAnalyzes resume text against job descriptions to provide ATS fit scores, missing keywords, and suggestions.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables resume review against job descriptions through a three-stage pipeline: match scoring, experience rewriting, and ATS optimization. Supports text or document uploads.2MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceTailor your CV to any job posting with ATS keyword scoring and clean PDF/DOCX export.63MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAnalyzes resumes against job descriptions to identify missing skills, keywords, and improvement opportunities using AI. Provides structured feedback including gap analysis, ATS optimization suggestions, and actionable recommendations to improve job application success.-
Glama MCP Gateway
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
TDQS
Only one tool exists, so there is no possibility of confusing it with another. The tool's purpose is clearly defined in its description.
The single tool name follows the verb_noun convention (score_resume). With only one tool, naming is trivially consistent and descriptive.
A single tool feels too thin for a resume-focused server. The server name suggests a broader resume assistance scope, but only one scoring operation is exposed.
The domain appears to be resume analysis and assistance, yet only resume scoring is provided. Missing operations like resume parsing, editing, or generation are significant gaps that would limit agent usefulness.