SocialSwarm
Server Details
Turn an article into several X/Twitter thread drafts, each with a different hook
- Status
- Healthy
- Last Tested
- Transport
- Streamable HTTP
- URL
Available Tools
1 toolgenerate_thread_variantsGenerate X/Twitter thread variantsAInspect
Turn an article URL or a block of text into several complete X/Twitter thread drafts. Each variant uses a different hook (curiosity, challenge, story, and at 5 variants also stat and question), and every tweet comes back with its character count already checked against the 280 limit. Returns drafts for a human to review — it does not post anything.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| sourceUrl | No | Required when sourceType is 'url'. Note that paywalled or bot-blocked pages will fail to fetch — fall back to sourceType 'text' with the article body. | |
| sourceText | No | Required when sourceType is 'text'. At least ~100 characters. | |
| sourceType | Yes | Use 'url' to fetch and extract an article, 'text' to pass content directly. | |
| variantCount | No | How many thread variants to generate. Only 3 or 5 are accepted. |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| variants | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations exist, so the description carries the full burden. It clearly states the tool does not post anything, only returns drafts for human review. It also notes character-count checking. This covers the most important behavioral aspects for a generation tool, though it could mention error handling for paywalled URLs (already in schema) or rate limits.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is two sentences with no extraneous words. It front-loads the main purpose and follows with key details (hooks, character limit, non-posting). Every sentence earns its place.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's complexity (generating multiple thread variants) and the presence of an output schema, the description covers: input source types, variant hooks, character limit validation, and the non-posting nature. It lacks detail on how the output is structured (handled by output schema) and does not mention the variantCount enum range (but schema covers that). Overall, very solid.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% so baseline is 3. The description adds context (e.g., 'different hook', 'character count checked') but these are more about output characteristics than parameter meaning. It does not add semantic details beyond what the schema's parameter descriptions provide.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses a specific verb-resource pair ('turn... into several complete X/Twitter thread drafts') and distinguishes the tool by stating it returns drafts for review, not posting. Since there are no sibling tools, no further differentiation is needed.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives (none exist). However, it implicitly suggests use for generating multiple thread drafts from URL or text, and it clarifies that the tool does not post, which acts as a boundary. No explicit when-not-to or prerequisites are given.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
1 tool update
- First observed
generate_thread_variants
Frequently Asked Questions
Claiming proves that you control a remote MCP connector. It does not move, proxy, or interrupt the server.
Open the connector listing, choose Claim ownership, and sign in to Glama.
Complete one verification method:
GitHub identity — fastest for official registry listings. For a namespace such as
io.github.alice/server, link the matching GitHub user, then choose Claim with GitHub. An organization namespace such asio.github.acme/serveralso needs that organization to have installed the Glama AI GitHub App and approved its permissions, because GitHub discloses organization membership only to apps it has installed. Use HTTP or DNS when it has not.HTTP challenge — works when you can deploy a public file. Generate a token, publish the exact JSON Glama shows at
/.well-known/glama.jsonon the same origin as the connector, then choose Check HTTP challenge.DNS challenge — works when you control DNS but cannot change the server. Generate a token, create the exact TXT record Glama shows, wait for it to propagate, then choose Check DNS challenge.
After verification, Glama sends a confirmation email and gives you access to listing details, thumbnails, health checks, and analytics. Keep the HTTP file or DNS record in place: Glama periodically checks it and ownership remains verified while the token is discoverable.
The HTTP ownership file has this structure:
{
"$schema": "https://glama.ai/mcp/schemas/connector.json",
"claim": "glama_claim_..."
}Claim tokens are opaque, stable, and bound to the signed-in Glama account. They contain no email address or other personal information. If Glama can no longer discover a verified HTTP or DNS token, it starts a seven-day grace period before removing claim-based access. Restore the same token during that period to keep ownership verified. Never publish an email address, Glama session token, GitHub token, or connector credential as ownership proof.
If verification fails, confirm that you copied the current token exactly. The HTTP file must be public, return valid JSON with a successful HTTP response, and stay on the connector's origin. DNS changes may need more time to propagate. A claim cannot transfer to a different origin or hostname: if the connector target changes, Glama starts the grace period and the new target must be claimed separately after the previous claim is released.
For a connector linked to the official MCP Registry, registry updates continue to replace its name, description, and URL by default. After claiming, open Manage connector and enable Use Glama listing details as the source of truth if edits made on Glama should be preserved. Categories and thumbnails are always managed on Glama; registry linkage and technical connection settings continue to sync.
Control your server's listing on Glama, including description and metadata
Access analytics and receive server usage reports
Get monitoring and health status updates for your server
Feature your server to boost visibility and reach more users
To improve your MCP server's ranking:
Claim ownership of the server listing
Complete the server profile with an accurate description and thumbnail
Provide a test profile so Glama can connect to and evaluate the server
Keep tool definitions clear and complete to earn a high Tool Definition Quality Score (TDQS)
Route real usage through the Glama Gateway; more recorded successful server uses also improve the ranking
For users:
Full audit trail – every tool call is logged with inputs and outputs for compliance and debugging
Granular tool control – enable or disable individual tools per connector to limit what your AI agents can do
Centralized credential management – store and rotate API keys and OAuth tokens in one place
Change alerts – get notified when a connector changes its schema, adds or removes tools, or updates tool definitions, so nothing breaks silently
For server owners:
Proven adoption – public usage metrics on your listing show real-world traction and build trust with prospective users
Tool-level analytics – see which tools are being used most, helping you prioritize development and documentation
Direct user feedback – users can report issues and suggest improvements through the listing, giving you a channel you would not have otherwise
The connector status is unhealthy when Glama is unable to successfully connect to the server. This can happen for several reasons:
The server is experiencing an outage
The URL of the server is wrong
Credentials required to access the server are missing or invalid
If you are the owner of this MCP connector and would like to make modifications to the listing, including providing test credentials for accessing the server, please contact support@glama.ai.
Discussions
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!
Related MCP Connectors
Turn any URL or text into Twitter threads, LinkedIn posts, Instagram captions, YouTube titles and…
Stop guessing what works on X/Twitter. Analyze your history, draft in your voice, schedule posts.
Draft SEO blog articles from topic to ready-to-review post.
Threads tools for AI — generate viral posts, download videos, export profiles
Related MCP Servers
- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables creators and marketers to generate viral social media hooks, format text into Twitter threads with proper character limits, and audit sales copy with actionable feedback on power words and CTAs.3-
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables creating, managing, and publishing X/Twitter posts, threads, and replies directly through Claude chat. Supports draft management with the ability to create, list, publish, and delete tweet drafts.101MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMulti-platform content distribution — draft posts, repurpose content, generate carousels, schedule, analyze performance, create threads. 7 MCP tools.717MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceTweet scoring using X's actual algorithm weights - 22 signals, 18 filters, 11 tools1-
Glama MCP Gateway
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
TDQS
With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion between tools. The tool's purpose is clearly defined and distinct from any other potential tool.
The single tool name 'generate_thread_variants' follows a clear verb_noun pattern, which is well-formed and descriptive. With only one tool, consistency is trivial.
The server name 'SocialSwarm' implies a broader suite of social media tools, but only one thread-variant generator is provided. One tool feels too thin for the implied scope, making it mismatched.
The tool covers only thread generation without posting or any other social media operations. Given the server name, there are significant gaps in functionality such as scheduling, posting, or analytics.