F
licenseB
qualityD
maintenanceEnables creators and marketers to generate viral social media hooks, format text into Twitter threads with proper character limits, and audit sales copy with actionable feedback on power words and CTAs.
3
SocialSwarm
Server Details
Turn an article into several X/Twitter thread drafts, each with a different hook
- Status
- Healthy
- Last Tested
- Transport
- Streamable HTTP
- URL
Glama MCP Gateway
Connect through Glama MCP Gateway for full control over tool access and complete visibility into every call.
MCP client
Glama
MCP server
Full call logging
Every tool call is logged with complete inputs and outputs, so you can debug issues and audit what your agents are doing.
Tool access control
Enable or disable individual tools per connector, so you decide what your agents can and cannot do.
Managed credentials
Glama handles OAuth flows, token storage, and automatic rotation, so credentials never expire on your clients.
Usage analytics
See which tools your agents call, how often, and when, so you can understand usage patterns and catch anomalies.
100% free. Your data is private.
Tool Definition Quality
A3.9/5.0
Tool DescriptionsA
Average 4/5 across 1 of 1 tools scored.
Server CoherenceA
Disambiguation5/5
With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion between tools. The tool's purpose is clearly defined and distinct from any other potential tool.
Naming Consistency5/5
The single tool name 'generate_thread_variants' follows a clear verb_noun pattern, which is well-formed and descriptive. With only one tool, consistency is trivial.
Tool Count2/5
The server name 'SocialSwarm' implies a broader suite of social media tools, but only one thread-variant generator is provided. One tool feels too thin for the implied scope, making it mismatched.
Completeness2/5
The tool covers only thread generation without posting or any other social media operations. Given the server name, there are significant gaps in functionality such as scheduling, posting, or analytics.
Available Tools
1 toolgenerate_thread_variantsGenerate X/Twitter thread variantsAInspect
Turn an article URL or a block of text into several complete X/Twitter thread drafts. Each variant uses a different hook (curiosity, challenge, story, and at 5 variants also stat and question), and every tweet comes back with its character count already checked against the 280 limit. Returns drafts for a human to review — it does not post anything.
ParametersJSON Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| sourceUrl | No | Required when sourceType is 'url'. Note that paywalled or bot-blocked pages will fail to fetch — fall back to sourceType 'text' with the article body. | |
| sourceText | No | Required when sourceType is 'text'. At least ~100 characters. | |
| sourceType | Yes | Use 'url' to fetch and extract an article, 'text' to pass content directly. | |
| variantCount | No | How many thread variants to generate. Only 3 or 5 are accepted. |
Output Schema
ParametersJSON Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| variants | Yes |
Tool Definition Quality
A4/5.0
Behavior4/5
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations exist, so the description carries the full burden. It clearly states the tool does not post anything, only returns drafts for human review. It also notes character-count checking. This covers the most important behavioral aspects for a generation tool, though it could mention error handling for paywalled URLs (already in schema) or rate limits.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Conciseness5/5
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is two sentences with no extraneous words. It front-loads the main purpose and follows with key details (hooks, character limit, non-posting). Every sentence earns its place.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Completeness4/5
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's complexity (generating multiple thread variants) and the presence of an output schema, the description covers: input source types, variant hooks, character limit validation, and the non-posting nature. It lacks detail on how the output is structured (handled by output schema) and does not mention the variantCount enum range (but schema covers that). Overall, very solid.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Parameters3/5
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% so baseline is 3. The description adds context (e.g., 'different hook', 'character count checked') but these are more about output characteristics than parameter meaning. It does not add semantic details beyond what the schema's parameter descriptions provide.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Purpose5/5
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses a specific verb-resource pair ('turn... into several complete X/Twitter thread drafts') and distinguishes the tool by stating it returns drafts for review, not posting. Since there are no sibling tools, no further differentiation is needed.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Usage Guidelines3/5
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives (none exist). However, it implicitly suggests use for generating multiple thread drafts from URL or text, and it clarifies that the tool does not post, which acts as a boundary. No explicit when-not-to or prerequisites are given.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Claim this connector by publishing a /.well-known/glama.json file on your server's domain with the following structure:
{
"$schema": "https://glama.ai/mcp/schemas/connector.json",
"maintainers": [{ "email": "your-email@example.com" }]
}The email address must match the email associated with your Glama account. Once published, Glama will automatically detect and verify the file within a few minutes.
Control your server's listing on Glama, including description and metadata
Access analytics and receive server usage reports
Get monitoring and health status updates for your server
Feature your server to boost visibility and reach more users
For users:
Full audit trail – every tool call is logged with inputs and outputs for compliance and debugging
Granular tool control – enable or disable individual tools per connector to limit what your AI agents can do
Centralized credential management – store and rotate API keys and OAuth tokens in one place
Change alerts – get notified when a connector changes its schema, adds or removes tools, or updates tool definitions, so nothing breaks silently
For server owners:
Proven adoption – public usage metrics on your listing show real-world traction and build trust with prospective users
Tool-level analytics – see which tools are being used most, helping you prioritize development and documentation
Direct user feedback – users can report issues and suggest improvements through the listing, giving you a channel you would not have otherwise
The connector status is unhealthy when Glama is unable to successfully connect to the server. This can happen for several reasons:
The server is experiencing an outage
The URL of the server is wrong
Credentials required to access the server are missing or invalid
If you are the owner of this MCP connector and would like to make modifications to the listing, including providing test credentials for accessing the server, please contact support@glama.ai.
Discussions
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables creating, managing, and publishing X/Twitter posts, threads, and replies directly through Claude chat. Supports draft management with the ability to create, list, publish, and delete tweet drafts.101MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMulti-platform content distribution — draft posts, repurpose content, generate carousels, schedule, analyze performance, create threads. 7 MCP tools.714MIT
- Flicense-qualityDmaintenanceTweet scoring using X's actual algorithm weights - 22 signals, 18 filters, 11 tools