Skip to main content
Glama

GRACE Hello MCP

Server Details

A very simple remote MCP server that greets you, with a custom icon.

Status
Unhealthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL
Repository
rajitharul/grace-hello-mcp
GitHub Stars
0
Server Listing
grace-hello-mcp

Glama MCP Gateway

Connect through Glama MCP Gateway for full control over tool access and complete visibility into every call.

MCP client
Glama
MCP server

Full call logging

Every tool call is logged with complete inputs and outputs, so you can debug issues and audit what your agents are doing.

Tool access control

Enable or disable individual tools per connector, so you decide what your agents can and cannot do.

Managed credentials

Glama handles OAuth flows, token storage, and automatic rotation, so credentials never expire on your clients.

Usage analytics

See which tools your agents call, how often, and when, so you can understand usage patterns and catch anomalies.

100% free. Your data is private.
Tool DescriptionsA

Average 4.1/5 across 1 of 1 tools scored.

Server CoherenceA
Disambiguation5/5

Only one tool exists, so there is no possibility of confusion between tools.

Naming Consistency5/5

The single tool name 'say_hello' follows a clear verb_noun pattern, consistent with common MCP naming conventions.

Tool Count3/5

One tool is borderline low for most servers, but it matches the narrow 'greeting' scope of this server.

Completeness4/5

The server fully covers its stated greeting purpose, though it could potentially offer additional greeting variations.

Available Tools

1 tool
say_helloSay HelloAInspect

Returns a friendly greeting for the given name.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
nameYesWho to greet.
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must fully disclose behavior. It states the output (friendly greeting) but does not explicitly mention side effects, permissions, or rate limits. For a simple read-only operation, this is minimally adequate.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that is front-loaded and contains no extraneous information. Every word earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (one required parameter, no output schema, no nested objects), the description is complete enough for an agent to use it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% coverage with the description of the 'name' parameter as 'Who to greet.' The tool description adds no additional context beyond what the schema already provides, justifying the baseline score.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb (returns) and the resource (friendly greeting) for a given name. It is specific and unambiguous, with no sibling tools to differentiate from.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implicitly indicates when to use the tool (when a greeting for a name is needed). There are no exclusion criteria or alternatives to mention, given no sibling tools, so the context is clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Related MCP Servers

View all MCP Servers

Try in Browser

Your Connectors

Sign in to create a connector for this server.