Skip to main content
Glama

GRACE Hello MCP

Server Details

A very simple remote MCP server that greets you, with a custom icon.

Status
Healthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL

Glama MCP Gateway

Connect through Glama MCP Gateway for full control over tool access and complete visibility into every call.

MCP client
Glama
MCP server

Full call logging

Every tool call is logged with complete inputs and outputs, so you can debug issues and audit what your agents are doing.

Tool access control

Enable or disable individual tools per connector, so you decide what your agents can and cannot do.

Managed credentials

Glama handles OAuth flows, token storage, and automatic rotation, so credentials never expire on your clients.

Usage analytics

See which tools your agents call, how often, and when, so you can understand usage patterns and catch anomalies.

100% free. Your data is private.
Tool DescriptionsA

Average 4.3/5 across 1 of 1 tools scored.

Server CoherenceA
Disambiguation5/5

With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion between tools. The tool's purpose is clear and distinct.

Naming Consistency5/5

The single tool name 'say_hello' follows a clear verb_noun pattern, though no comparison is needed. Consistency is not applicable but the name is well-formed.

Tool Count1/5

A single tool for a server is extremely minimal and suggests either a trivial purpose or incomplete implementation. For a server named 'GRACE Hello MCP', one tool feels insufficient for anything beyond a demo.

Completeness3/5

The tool covers the basic greeting functionality implied by the server name, but there are no additional tools for customization or extended interactions. The surface is complete for a minimal greeting service but lacks depth.

Available Tools

1 tool
say_helloSay HelloAInspect

Returns a friendly greeting for the given name.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
nameYesWho to greet.
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Without annotations, the description carries full burden. It discloses that the tool returns a greeting, indicating a read-only operation. While no details about side effects or rate limits are needed for this simple tool, the transparency is adequate.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no wasted words. Every word serves a purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simplicity of the tool (one required parameter, no output schema, no siblings), the description is fully complete. It states what the tool does and what input it requires.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, with the schema already defining 'name' as 'Who to greet.' The description adds no additional parameter meaning, placing it at the baseline of 3.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Returns a friendly greeting for the given name' clearly states the action (returns), the resource (greeting), and the input (name). It is specific and distinguishes itself from any potential siblings, though none exist.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit when/when-not or alternatives are provided, but with no sibling tools and a simple purpose, the context is clear. The description implies usage for greeting a person by name.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Try in Browser

Your Connectors

Sign in to create a connector for this server.

Resources