Lifestyle Medicine Knowledge
Server Details
Semantic search over a 200-chunk ACLM lifestyle medicine knowledge base.
- Status
- Healthy
- Last Tested
- Transport
- Streamable HTTP
- URL
- Repository
- rabyavalla/bonsai-api
- GitHub Stars
- 0
Glama MCP Gateway
Connect through Glama MCP Gateway for full control over tool access and complete visibility into every call.
Full call logging
Every tool call is logged with complete inputs and outputs, so you can debug issues and audit what your agents are doing.
Tool access control
Enable or disable individual tools per connector, so you decide what your agents can and cannot do.
Managed credentials
Glama handles OAuth flows, token storage, and automatic rotation, so credentials never expire on your clients.
Usage analytics
See which tools your agents call, how often, and when, so you can understand usage patterns and catch anomalies.
Tool Definition Quality
Average 3.8/5 across 1 of 1 tools scored.
With only one tool, there is no possibility of ambiguity or overlapping purposes. The tool's purpose is clearly and distinctly stated.
The single tool name follows a clear and readable pattern (noun_verb-like). With only one tool, consistency is inherently maintained.
The server claims to cover a vast knowledge base spanning multiple lifestyle medicine pillars, yet it provides only one tool. This is too few for the apparent scope, making the tool count inappropriate.
The single tool appears to fully cover the server's stated purpose of answering lifestyle medicine questions with citations. There are no obvious gaps in the tool surface for a query-only domain.
Available Tools
1 toollifestyle_queryARead-onlyInspect
Ask any lifestyle medicine question. Returns evidence-based answer with citations from a 200-chunk knowledge base spanning ACLM 6-pillars, B.O.N.S.A.I. nutrition, drug-food interactions, lab interpretation, GLP guidance, wearables, and CGM signal interpretation.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| query | Yes | ||
| pillar | No | any | |
| max_results | No |
Tool Definition Quality
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and openWorldHint=false. The description adds meaningful context beyond those hints by specifying the knowledge base size ('200-chunk'), the type of output ('evidence-based answer with citations'), and the broad content areas. This helps set expectations about the tool's bounded scope and response format.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is two sentences, front-loaded with the main action, and every phrase adds value. It packs a lot of useful information (knowledge base size, content domains, output format) without redundancy or filler.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given moderate complexity (3 params, enums, no output schema), the description does mention the return format ('evidence-based answer with citations'), which is helpful. However, it omits guidance on optional parameters and does not fully compensate for the lack of schema descriptions or output schema. It is adequate but has clear gaps.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate, but it only indirectly addresses the 'query' parameter. It does not explain the 'pillar' filter or 'max_results' parameter at all, even though the schema shows a rich enum and defaults. This is a significant gap, as the agent gets no guidance on how to use the optional parameters.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool's function: 'Ask any lifestyle medicine question' and specifies the resource and output ('evidence-based answer with citations from a 200-chunk knowledge base'). The scope is well-defined, and although there are no siblings to distinguish from, the purpose is unambiguous.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides a clear context for use: any lifestyle medicine question, and delimits the domain (ACLM pillars, nutrition, labs, etc.). Since there are no sibling tools, it does not explicitly state alternatives or exclusions, but it effectively communicates when this tool is appropriate.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Frequently Asked Questions
Claiming proves that you control a remote MCP connector. It does not move, proxy, or interrupt the server.
Open the connector listing, choose Claim ownership, and sign in to Glama.
Complete one verification method:
GitHub identity — fastest for official registry listings. For a namespace such as
io.github.alice/server, link the matching GitHub user or an account that owns the GitHub organization, then choose Claim with GitHub.HTTP challenge — works when you can deploy a public file. Generate a token, publish the exact JSON Glama shows at
/.well-known/glama.jsonon the same origin as the connector, then choose Check HTTP challenge.DNS challenge — works when you control DNS but cannot change the server. Generate a token, create the exact TXT record Glama shows, wait for it to propagate, then choose Check DNS challenge.
After verification, Glama sends a confirmation email and gives you access to listing details, thumbnails, health checks, and analytics. Keep the HTTP file or DNS record in place: Glama periodically checks it and ownership remains verified while the token is discoverable.
The HTTP ownership file has this structure:
{
"$schema": "https://glama.ai/mcp/schemas/connector.json",
"claim": "glama_claim_..."
}Claim tokens are opaque, stable, and bound to the signed-in Glama account. They contain no email address or other personal information. If Glama can no longer discover a verified HTTP or DNS token, it starts a seven-day grace period before removing claim-based access. Restore the same token during that period to keep ownership verified. Never publish an email address, Glama session token, GitHub token, or connector credential as ownership proof.
If verification fails, confirm that you copied the current token exactly. The HTTP file must be public, return valid JSON with a successful HTTP response, and stay on the connector's origin. DNS changes may need more time to propagate. A claim cannot transfer to a different origin or hostname: if the connector target changes, Glama starts the grace period and the new target must be claimed separately after the previous claim is released.
For a connector linked to the official MCP Registry, registry updates continue to replace its name, description, and URL by default. After claiming, open Manage connector and enable Use Glama listing details as the source of truth if edits made on Glama should be preserved. Categories and thumbnails are always managed on Glama; registry linkage and technical connection settings continue to sync.
Control your server's listing on Glama, including description and metadata
Access analytics and receive server usage reports
Get monitoring and health status updates for your server
Feature your server to boost visibility and reach more users
For users:
Full audit trail – every tool call is logged with inputs and outputs for compliance and debugging
Granular tool control – enable or disable individual tools per connector to limit what your AI agents can do
Centralized credential management – store and rotate API keys and OAuth tokens in one place
Change alerts – get notified when a connector changes its schema, adds or removes tools, or updates tool definitions, so nothing breaks silently
For server owners:
Proven adoption – public usage metrics on your listing show real-world traction and build trust with prospective users
Tool-level analytics – see which tools are being used most, helping you prioritize development and documentation
Direct user feedback – users can report issues and suggest improvements through the listing, giving you a channel you would not have otherwise
The connector status is unhealthy when Glama is unable to successfully connect to the server. This can happen for several reasons:
The server is experiencing an outage
The URL of the server is wrong
Credentials required to access the server are missing or invalid
If you are the owner of this MCP connector and would like to make modifications to the listing, including providing test credentials for accessing the server, please contact support@glama.ai.
Discussions
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables querying a local health knowledge base with hybrid RAG (vector + FTS5) and exploring backlinks between notes.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables semantic search over a personal document corpus through MCP tools, allowing users to retrieve ranked chunks, access full document context, and list sources from their semester notes.
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables semantic search and knowledge management for storing and querying principles, patterns, and learnings using hybrid keyword and vector search.1
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables semantic search across personal PDF paper collections with page-level citations, allowing users to query their library from any MCP-capable client.9