Sanctions Screening
Server Details
Screen names against the US Consolidated Screening List: OFAC SDN, BIS Entity List +10 more lists
Glama couldn't complete the latest health check. If this server requires authentication, missing or expired test credentials may be the cause. A test profile lets Glama authenticate for health checks and discover tools; it is separate from your personal connections.
If you are the author, claim ownership, then add or update a test profile under Admin → Test Profile.
- Status
- Unhealthy
- Last Tested
- Transport
- Streamable HTTP
- URL
- Repository
- pipeworx-io/mcp-sanctions-screening
- GitHub Stars
- 0
- Server Listing
- mcp-sanctions-screening
TDQS
Scored across 34 tools
Three ask_pipeworx variants (base/beta/grounded) and multiple discovery/meta tools (discover_tools, suggest_questions, ask_pipeworx) create overlapping entry points; beta is explicitly identical to base, causing confusion. Other tool families (polymarket, entity research) are more distinct, but an agent must read descriptions carefully to choose correctly.
All snake_case, but naming patterns vary: verb_noun (compare_entities, resolve_entity), noun_noun (entity_profile, polymarket_arbitrage), and bare verbs (remember, forget). Readable but not a predictable convention.
34 tools is heavy for a server labeled 'Sanctions Screening' — the set spans sanctions, Polymarket betting, AI visibility, entity research, and subscriptions. Includes experimental duplicates (ask_pipeworx_beta), which inflate the count.
The sanctions subset (screen, entry lookup, list coverage) is reasonably complete for screening workflows, but the overall surface mixes many unrelated domains, making it hard to assess a coherent domain. No obvious gap in core sanctions, but bulk screening/watchlist management absent.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
1 tool update
- Changed
bet_research2 fields changed- changed
Input schema / examplesPrevious value: -[ - { - "market": "when-will-bitcoin-hit-150k" - }, - { - "market": "https://polymarket.com/event/when-will-bitcoin-hit-150k" - } -]New value: +[ + { + "market": "will-kristi-noem-win-the-2028-republican-presidential-nomination" + }, + { + "market": "https://polymarket.com/event/will-kristi-noem-win-the-2028-republican-presidential-nomination" + } +] - changed
Input schema / properties / market / descriptionPrevious value: -"Polymarket slug (\"when-will-bitcoin-hit-150k\"), full URL (\"https://polymarket.com/event/...\"), or question text (\"Will Bitcoin hit $150k?\"). Dated slugs stop resolving once they settle — Polymarket de-indexes resolved markets — so prefer an undated one."New value: +"Polymarket slug (\"will-kristi-noem-win-the-2028-republican-presidential-nomination\"), full URL (\"https://polymarket.com/event/...\"), or question text (\"Will Bitcoin hit $150k?\"). Dated slugs stop resolving once they settle — Polymarket de-indexes resolved markets — so prefer an undated one."
2 tool updates
- Changed
bet_research2 fields changed- changed
Input schema / examplesPrevious value: -[ - { - "market": "will-bitcoin-reach-100k-in-july-2026" - }, - { - "market": "https://polymarket.com/event/will-bitcoin-hit-150k-by-june-30-2026" - } -]New value: +[ + { + "market": "when-will-bitcoin-hit-150k" + }, + { + "market": "https://polymarket.com/event/when-will-bitcoin-hit-150k" + } +] - changed
Input schema / properties / market / descriptionPrevious value: -"Polymarket slug (\"will-bitcoin-hit-150k-by-june-30-2026\"), full URL (\"https://polymarket.com/event/...\"), or question text (\"Will Bitcoin hit $150k by June 30?\")"New value: +"Polymarket slug (\"when-will-bitcoin-hit-150k\"), full URL (\"https://polymarket.com/event/...\"), or question text (\"Will Bitcoin hit $150k?\"). Dated slugs stop resolving once they settle — Polymarket de-indexes resolved markets — so prefer an undated one."
- Changed
polymarket_kalshi_spread2 fields changed- changed
Input schema / examplesPrevious value: -[ - { - "topic": "fed" - }, - { - "topic": "btc" - } -]New value: +[ + { + "topic": "fed" + }, + { + "topic": "btc" + }, + { + "topic": "bitcoin" + }, + { + "topic": "fed rate decision" + } +] - changed
Input schema / properties / topic / descriptionPrevious value: -"Pre-mapped: fed | btc | cpi | gdp | sp500 | recession | next_pope | next_uk_pm | next_israel_pm | 2028_president"New value: +"Subject to compare. Canonical keys: fed | btc | eth | cpi | gdp | sp500 | recession | next_pope | next_uk_pm | next_israel_pm | 2028_president — but aliases and keywords resolve too (\"bitcoin\", \"fed rate decision\", \"ethereum\", \"inflation\", \"s&p 500\", \"us recession\", \"next pope\", \"2028 election\"). Check resolution.topic_matched_by in the response: \"exact\"/\"alias\" is a curated pairing, \"phrase\"/\"token\" is a keyword guess."
1 tool update
- Changed
sanctions_screen1 field changed- changed
Input schema / examplesPrevious value: -[ - { - "name": "Rosneft" - }, - { - "country": "CN", - "limit": 5, - "name": "Huawei Technologies", - "type": "Entity" - } -]New value: +[ + { + "name": "Rosneft" + }, + { + "name": "Сбербанк" + }, + { + "country": "CN", + "limit": 5, + "name": "Huawei Technologies", + "type": "Entity" + } +]
1 tool update
- Changed
entity_profile3 fields changed- changed
Input schema / properties / type / descriptionPrevious value: -"Entity type. Only \"company\" supported today; person/place coming soon."New value: +"\"company\" or \"ticker\" — both are accepted and behave identically; `value` can be a ticker, CIK, or company name either way. person/place coming soon." - changed
Input schema / properties / type / enumPrevious value: -[ - "company" -]New value: +[ + "company", + "ticker" +] - changed
Input schema / properties / value / descriptionPrevious value: -"Ticker (e.g., \"AAPL\") or zero-padded CIK (e.g., \"0000320193\"). Names not supported — use resolve_entity first if you only have a name."New value: +"Ticker (e.g., \"AAPL\"), zero-padded CIK (e.g., \"0000320193\"), or company name (e.g., \"Moderna\") — names resolve via SEC EDGAR company-name match."
Related MCP Connectors
Screen names against OFAC SDN and 7 more global sanctions lists. Free, no account required.
Screen a name or entity against OFAC SDN, the EU Consolidated list and the UK list.
Screen a name against OFAC's SDN and Consolidated Sanctions lists before a transaction.
Screen people & companies against 12 US sanctions & exclusion lists (OFAC, LEIE, SAM, Medicaid).
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceScreen names against consolidated OFAC, EU, UK, and UN sanctions lists and resolve legal entities via GLEIF, with offline fuzzy matching.103 npm1Apache 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceScreens names and companies against OFAC, EU, UK, and UN sanctions lists with fuzzy-match scores, supporting bulk lookups for AML/KYC checks. Data is sourced directly from official government lists and cached for fast repeat checks.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceChecks names against US FinCEN financial crime lists for compliance and AML due diligence, with a single read-only tool.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables screening names and batches against global sanctions, PEP, and watchlists for AML compliance, returning scored matches.MIT
Glama MCP Gateway
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.