Skip to main content
Glama

Server Details

MITRE ATT&CK adversary TTPs (STIX bundles)

Status
Unhealthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL
Repository
pipeworx-io/mcp-mitre-attck
GitHub Stars
0

Glama MCP Gateway

Connect through Glama MCP Gateway for full control over tool access and complete visibility into every call.

MCP client
Glama
MCP server

Full call logging

Every tool call is logged with complete inputs and outputs, so you can debug issues and audit what your agents are doing.

Tool access control

Enable or disable individual tools per connector, so you decide what your agents can and cannot do.

Managed credentials

Glama handles OAuth flows, token storage, and automatic rotation, so credentials never expire on your clients.

Usage analytics

See which tools your agents call, how often, and when, so you can understand usage patterns and catch anomalies.

100% free. Your data is private.
Tool DescriptionsC

Average 3.8/5 across 21 of 21 tools scored. Lowest: 1/5.

Server CoherenceC
Disambiguation3/5

The tools split into two distinct groups: MITRE ATT&CK tools (group, mitigation, technique, etc.) and Pipeworx data tools (ask_pipeworx, bet_research, compare_entities, etc.). While within each group tools are fairly distinct, the overall mix can confuse an agent expecting only MITRE tools. Some tools like 'search' and 'discover_tools' have overlapping purposes for finding information.

Naming Consistency2/5

Tool names are inconsistent: some use verb_noun patterns (e.g., ask_pipeworx, resolve_entity), while MITRE tools use single nouns (group, technique, tactic). CamelCase is not used, but underscore conventions vary. The mix of single-word and multi-word names with underscores creates no clear pattern.

Tool Count2/5

With 21 tools, the server seems overloaded for its stated MITRE ATT&CK purpose. Only 7 tools are directly MITRE-related, while the remaining 14 are from a completely different domain (Pipeworx data and betting). This mismatch makes the tool count feel excessive and unfocused.

Completeness2/5

For MITRE ATT&CK, the coverage is minimal: basic lookups exist but no relationship queries, listing, or advanced analysis. For the Pipeworx side, it appears more complete but that domain is not expected from the server name. Overall, the surface has significant gaps for its primary stated purpose.

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Try in Browser

Your Connectors

Sign in to create a connector for this server.