Skip to main content
Glama

Internet Archive

Server Details

Internet Archive (archive.org) item search & metadata MCP.

If you are the author of this connector, you can claim ownership with GitHub, an HTTP challenge, or a DNS record. Claimed connector authors can inspect health checks, view analytics, and manage their listing.
Status
Unhealthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL
Repository
pipeworx-io/mcp-internet-archive
GitHub Stars
0
Server Listing
mcp-internet-archive

Frequently Asked Questions

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    MCP server for the Internet Archive's Wayback Machine. Search archived snapshots, extract page text from a specific date, track how a site has changed over time, check if broken links are recoverable, and perform research across Internet Archive collections.
    6
    3
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Full-coverage MCP server for Internet Archive, enabling search, metadata lookup, collection browsing, and Wayback Machine snapshot retrieval via 13 tools.
    BSD Zero Clause
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Search the Wayback Machine and IA library (40M+ items), fetch archived snapshots, retrieve item metadata and full text via MCP.
    333
    2
    Apache 2.0
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    An MCP server that searches across the Internet Archive and Library of Congress at once, merging results while keeping each archive's differences. Provides tools to search inside texts, search catalogues, and retrieve item records, all read-only and without an API key.
    2
    3
    402
    MIT
Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.9/5.0
Disambiguation3/5

Several tools have overlapping purposes: ask_pipeworx, ask_pipeworx_beta, and ask_pipeworx_grounded are near-identical in routing, and the six prediction-market tools (bet_research, polymarket_edges, polymarket_arbitrage, polymarket_edge_tracker, polymarket_fill_risk, polymarket_kalshi_spread) all target edge detection/fill risk. However, the descriptions are so detailed that an agent can usually pick correctly, so the ambiguity is moderate rather than severe.

Naming Consistency4/5

All tool names use snake_case and most follow a verb_noun pattern (ask_pipeworx, compare_entities, resolve_entity, validate_claim). A few noun-led names (entity_profile, polymarket_arbitrage, pipeworx_trending) deviate from the pattern, but the style is consistent enough to be predictable.

Tool Count2/5

With 31 tools, the set exceeds the 25-tool threshold for 'too many.' Several tools are redundant variants (ask_pipeworx_beta exists only as an experimental duplicate; ai_visibility_check is subsumed by scan_competitor_ai_presence), and many could be consolidated without losing capability. The count feels bloated for a single server.

Completeness4/5

For its apparent domain (structured data research, prediction markets, memory, subscriptions), the surface is thorough: lookups, deep research, entity profiles, comparisons, claim validation, and meta-discovery all have coverage. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no direct tool to edit saved memories, no 'update' operation for subscriptions), but agents can work around them.