Skip to main content
Glama

Server Details

GovTrack MCP — federal US Congress data (free, no auth)

If you are the author of this connector, you can claim ownership with GitHub, an HTTP challenge, or a DNS record. Claimed connector authors can inspect health checks, view analytics, and manage their listing.
Status
Unhealthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL
Repository
pipeworx-io/mcp-govtrack
GitHub Stars
0
Server Listing
mcp-govtrack

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. 1 tool update
    • Changeddeep_research1 field changed
      • changedInput schema / properties / depth / description
        Previous value: -"How many facets to research in parallel: quick=3 (single hop), standard=5 (default; adds a gap-recovery hop that re-angles unanswered facets + a contradictions[] scan across findings), thorough=8 (paid; adds a full iterative hop that chases leads + recovers gaps, plus the contradictions[] scan)."New value: +"How many facets to research in parallel: quick=3 (single hop), standard=3 (default; adds a gap-recovery hop that re-angles unanswered facets + a contradictions[] scan across findings), thorough=6 (paid; adds a full iterative hop that chases leads + recovers gaps, plus the contradictions[] scan)."

Frequently Asked Questions

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Remote MCP server for nonpartisan U.S. Congress data: plain-language bill decodes (bilingual EN/ES), representative lookup by ZIP with district-office phones, and what's-moving urgency ranking. Read-only, keyless.
    5
    1
    AGPL 3.0
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Provides access to US Congress data via the GovTrack API, allowing AI agents to query congressional information without authentication.
    14
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    MCP server for the Congress.gov API that tracks US federal legislative process, providing tools to search bills and get bill details.
    11
    1
    Apache 2.0
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    MCP server for US government transparency data (congressional trades, federal contracts, campaign finance, lobbying, regulations) with per-call paid access via x402 USDC.
    4
    10
    231
    MIT
Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.9/5.0
Disambiguation2/5

ask_pipeworx, ask_pipeworx_beta, and ask_pipeworx_grounded are near-duplicate routers — the beta currently behaves identically to stable, creating a genuine misselection trap. The six polymarket tools (arbitrage, edges, bet_research, fill_risk, kalshi_spread, edge_tracker) also have fuzzy boundaries, with several overlapping on 'find a trade opportunity'.

Naming Consistency3/5

Most names follow a consistent snake_case verb-first convention (resolve_entity, validate_claim, compare_entities, search_within) and the polymarket_*/pipeworx_* family prefixes are regular. But there are deviations: ask_pipeworx breaks the underscore pattern, bet_research drops the polymarket_* prefix despite belonging to that family, and ai_visibility_check / generate_llms_txt deviate from verb-first naming.

Tool Count2/5

At 31 tools this exceeds the 25+ threshold, and much of the surface is meta-tooling (discover_tools, suggest_questions, pipeworx_feedback, pipeworx_trending), memory utilities (remember/recall/forget), and subscription management rather than core data access. The 5,621-tool routing breadth justifies size, but the count is bloated by utilities peripheral to the stated purpose.

Completeness4/5

The primary research lifecycle is well covered: resolve_entity → ask_pipeworx/deep_research → entity_profile → compare_entities → recent_changes → validate_claim/ask_pipeworx_grounded → search_within, with stable citations throughout. Prediction-market workflows are likewise complete (research, edges, arbitrage, fill-risk, cross-venue spread, persistence). No obvious dead-ends for the core purpose — the gaps are off-domain additions (llms.txt generation, npm scanning) that add bloat rather than leave holes.