Tamer Prompt Marketplace

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full disclosure burden. It does disclose return content (price and purchase address), which implies a read-only catalog listing, but says nothing about permissions, pagination, filtering, or whether the list is exhaustive or truncated.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single, front-loaded sentence with no redundant filler. It is efficient, though extremely short sentences leave little room to add routing or behavioral detail.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a parameterless list tool with no output schema, the description covers the essentials: what is listed and which fields (price, purchase address) come back. It is nearly sufficient, missing only scope details like pagination or whether results are filtered.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool takes zero parameters and schema description coverage is 100%, so there is nothing for the description to clarify. The baseline of 4 applies for a parameterless tool.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description gives a clear verb ('فهرست' = list) and a resource ('محصولات قابلخرید' = purchasable products), so the action is understandable on its own. However, it calls the resource 'products' while the tool name is 'list_tamer_prompts', an unresolved mismatch that leaves ambiguity about whether prompts or products are being listed. No siblings exist to disambiguate against.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no statement of when to use this tool, when not to, or any alternative. With no sibling tools the risk is lower, but the definition still offers zero usage context such as preconditions or expected scenarios.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.