Celestium: Cosmic Compass
Server Details
Real astrology for AI agents: cosmic weather, synastry, timing, astrocartography, and divination.
- Status
- Healthy
- Last Tested
- Transport
- Streamable HTTP
- URL
Tool Definition Quality
Average 4.7/5 across 1 of 1 tools scored.
Only one tool exists, so there is no risk of confusion between tools. The single tool's actions are listed within its description, but the tool itself is unambiguous.
With only one tool named 'celestium', there is no pattern to evaluate. The name is a single noun, not following a verb_noun convention, but it is not inconsistent with any other tool names.
Having a single tool that bundles over 30 actions is a severe mismatch for the server's broad scope. It violates the principle of one tool per distinct operation, making it difficult for agents to discover and invoke specific capabilities.
The tool appears to cover a comprehensive set of astrology and divination features, including ephemeris, charts, synastry, tarot, and more. Minor gaps may exist (e.g., unsupported advanced techniques), but the surface is largely complete for the domain.
Available Tools
1 toolcelestiumARead-onlyInspect
Celestium: Cosmic Compass — accurate astrology & divination for AI agents, with engine-authored interpretations attached (not LLM guesswork; real ephemeris, verified arcminute-accurate). Includes practice actions: check_in (sky + moment verdict + matched ritual), ritual (step-by-step moon-phase practices), tarot (auditable draws), review (temporal review of a period against your chart). Actions: cosmic_weather, chart, positions, moon, moment_quality, retrograde, voc, planetary_hours, sunrise, ritual, tarot, check_in, natal_reading, iching, mayan, numerology, true_sky, event_debrief, composite, davison, relocation, relocation_score, travel, transits, synastry, timing, progressions, electional, horary, returns, timeline, synthesis, perfections, midpoints, harmonic, antiscia, declination, sidereal, heliacal, review, bazi, year_ahead, correlate, common_threads. Free tier: cosmic_weather, chart, positions, moon, moment_quality, retrograde, voc, planetary_hours, sunrise, ritual, tarot, check_in, natal_reading, iching, mayan, numerology, true_sky, event_debrief. Celestium Pro unlocks depth + relationship charts (synastry/composite/davison), astrocartography (relocation/travel), advanced techniques, and review.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| data | No | Birth data + params. birth: {name, birth_date (YYYY-MM-DD), birth_time (HH:MM), birth_timezone (IANA), latitude, longitude, birth_location}. partner: same birth shape (synastry/composite/davison; also adds relationship activations to cosmic_weather/check_in). For place-based actions (relocation, relocation_score, planetary_hours, sunrise, heliacal, electional), top-level latitude/longitude = the TARGET location. Plus optional date, start, end, return_type (solar|lunar), city, planet, number (harmonic), orb (antiscia), system (sidereal: lahiri|raman|kp), activity (electional: marriage|business|travel|surgery|legal_matter|creative_work|investment|medical_treatment), ritual: type + max_minutes; tarot: count (1-3) + question; iching: question; check_in: mood, focus, intent, local_hour; review: period (week|month) or start+end; horary: question + house (1-12) + latitude/longitude; bazi: gender (male|female). render: true (natal_reading only) → also returns a viewable_url: a shareable, unlisted, auto-expiring, revocable web page of the chart+reading; render:{ttl_days:N} sets the expiry (default 90d), render:{burn:true} makes it view-once, render:{e2ee:true} encrypts it at rest (key only in the link #fragment; we store ciphertext and cannot read it). Nothing is stored unless you opt in with render; without it, calls are pure compute. | |
| action | Yes | The astrology/divination action to run. | |
| identity | No | Caller email/identity (resolves entitlement tier; optional in free tier). |
Tool Definition Quality
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description exceeds annotations by detailing ephemeris accuracy, pure compute nature, storage only on render opt-in, and rendering options (ttl, burn, e2ee). Adds significant context beyond readOnlyHint=true and destructiveHint=false.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is lengthy but warranted given the tool's 50+ actions and complex parameters. It front-loads the core purpose and lists actions clearly, though a structured format (e.g., bullet points) would improve scanability.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a complex tool with 3 parameters (one nested object), the description covers actions, tier limitations, ephemeris source, storage behavior, and rendering. It leaves no gaps, even without an output schema.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Despite 100% schema coverage, the description adds deep meaning to the 'data' parameter, explaining partner data, place-based location fields, and render options in detail, far surpassing the schema's property descriptions.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly identifies the tool as 'accurate astrology & divination for AI agents' with engine-authored interpretations. It lists all available actions, distinguishing free vs Pro, and leaves no ambiguity about what the tool does.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description explains free vs Pro tiers and lists actions available in each, giving implicit guidance on when to use certain actions. However, it lacks explicit 'when to use' vs alternatives, though no siblings exist.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Frequently Asked Questions
Claiming proves that you control a remote MCP connector. It does not move, proxy, or interrupt the server.
Open the connector listing, choose Claim ownership, and sign in to Glama.
Complete one verification method:
GitHub identity — fastest for official registry listings. For a namespace such as
io.github.alice/server, link the matching GitHub user or an account that owns the GitHub organization, then choose Claim with GitHub.HTTP challenge — works when you can deploy a public file. Generate a token, publish the exact JSON Glama shows at
/.well-known/glama.jsonon the same origin as the connector, then choose Check HTTP challenge.DNS challenge — works when you control DNS but cannot change the server. Generate a token, create the exact TXT record Glama shows, wait for it to propagate, then choose Check DNS challenge.
After verification, Glama sends a confirmation email and gives you access to listing details, thumbnails, health checks, and analytics. Keep the HTTP file or DNS record in place: Glama periodically checks it and ownership remains verified while the token is discoverable.
The HTTP ownership file has this structure:
{
"$schema": "https://glama.ai/mcp/schemas/connector.json",
"claim": "glama_claim_..."
}Claim tokens are opaque, stable, and bound to the signed-in Glama account. They contain no email address or other personal information. If Glama can no longer discover a verified HTTP or DNS token, it starts a seven-day grace period before removing claim-based access. Restore the same token during that period to keep ownership verified. Never publish an email address, Glama session token, GitHub token, or connector credential as ownership proof.
If verification fails, confirm that you copied the current token exactly. The HTTP file must be public, return valid JSON with a successful HTTP response, and stay on the connector's origin. DNS changes may need more time to propagate. A claim cannot transfer to a different origin or hostname: if the connector target changes, Glama starts the grace period and the new target must be claimed separately after the previous claim is released.
For a connector linked to the official MCP Registry, registry updates continue to replace its name, description, and URL by default. After claiming, open Manage connector and enable Use Glama listing details as the source of truth if edits made on Glama should be preserved. Categories and thumbnails are always managed on Glama; registry linkage and technical connection settings continue to sync.
Control your server's listing on Glama, including description and metadata
Access analytics and receive server usage reports
Get monitoring and health status updates for your server
Feature your server to boost visibility and reach more users
To improve your MCP server's ranking:
Claim ownership of the server listing
Complete the server profile with an accurate description and thumbnail
Provide a test profile so Glama can connect to and evaluate the server
Keep tool definitions clear and complete to earn a high Tool Definition Quality Score (TDQS)
Route real usage through the Glama Gateway; more recorded successful server uses also improve the ranking
For users:
Full audit trail – every tool call is logged with inputs and outputs for compliance and debugging
Granular tool control – enable or disable individual tools per connector to limit what your AI agents can do
Centralized credential management – store and rotate API keys and OAuth tokens in one place
Change alerts – get notified when a connector changes its schema, adds or removes tools, or updates tool definitions, so nothing breaks silently
For server owners:
Proven adoption – public usage metrics on your listing show real-world traction and build trust with prospective users
Tool-level analytics – see which tools are being used most, helping you prioritize development and documentation
Direct user feedback – users can report issues and suggest improvements through the listing, giving you a channel you would not have otherwise
The connector status is unhealthy when Glama is unable to successfully connect to the server. This can happen for several reasons:
The server is experiencing an outage
The URL of the server is wrong
Credentials required to access the server are missing or invalid
If you are the owner of this MCP connector and would like to make modifications to the listing, including providing test credentials for accessing the server, please contact support@glama.ai.
Discussions
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!
Related MCP Connectors
Western natal charts, horoscopes, transits and synastry for AI agents, verified vs NASA JPL.
Astrology transit forecasts, timelines and significant-date feeds for AI agents.
Sub-arcsecond ephemeris and astrology on NASA JPL DE440: natal, transits, eclipses, Human Design.
Аccess to personalized Enigmata astrological forecasts (day/week/month/thematic) for AI assistants
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceHigh-precision astrology tools for LLM agents, including natal charts, transits, progressions, synastry, and more, backed by Swiss Ephemeris.1MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMulti-tradition astrology engine that computes real birth charts, transits, and synastry for AI agents via MCP tools.6
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceAstrology MCP server that computes natal charts, transits, synastry, progressions, returns, eclipses, retrogrades, and moon phases from a real ephemeris, enabling AI agents to provide accurate astrological calculations without hallucination.12721MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides real astrology and tarot computations using actual ephemeris and a 78-card deck, returning structured data such as natal charts, synastry, transits, and tarot draws without relying on an LLM for astrological facts.