Skip to main content
Glama

korean-saju-calculator

Server Details

Korean Four Pillars (Saju/BaZi) calculator: pillars, elements, ten gods, sinsal, luck cycles.

Status
Healthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL

Glama MCP Gateway

Connect through Glama MCP Gateway for full control over tool access and complete visibility into every call.

MCP client
Glama
MCP server

Full call logging

Every tool call is logged with complete inputs and outputs, so you can debug issues and audit what your agents are doing.

Tool access control

Enable or disable individual tools per connector, so you decide what your agents can and cannot do.

Managed credentials

Glama handles OAuth flows, token storage, and automatic rotation, so credentials never expire on your clients.

Usage analytics

See which tools your agents call, how often, and when, so you can understand usage patterns and catch anomalies.

100% free. Your data is private.
Tool DescriptionsA

Average 4.4/5 across 1 of 1 tools scored.

Server CoherenceA
Disambiguation5/5

Only one tool exists, so there is no possibility of confusion between tools.

Naming Consistency5/5

With a single tool, naming consistency is trivially maintained.

Tool Count5/5

The single tool directly and completely covers the server's stated purpose of computing Korean saju charts, making the count appropriate.

Completeness5/5

The tool returns all expected outputs (pillars, elements, gods, luck cycles) for the domain, leaving no obvious gaps.

Available Tools

1 tool
compute_sajuCompute Korean Saju (Four Pillars / BaZi)AInspect

Deterministic Korean Four Pillars chart from birth date/time. Astronomically grounded (Meeus), true-solar-time corrected, historical Korea timezone aware. Returns pillars, five elements, ten gods, sinsal, and luck cycles as structured JSON.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dYes
mYes
yYes출생 연도 (음양력 변환 신뢰범위 1900~2100)
hourNo시 (24h, 기본 0)
genderYes성별 (대운 방향 결정)
isLeapNo음력 윤달 여부
minuteNo분 (기본 0)
calendarNo양력(solar) 또는 음력(lunar)solar
longitudeNo출생지 경도 (진태양시 보정, 기본 서울 126.978)
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It discloses that the tool is deterministic, uses Meeus algorithms, true-solar-time correction, and historical timezone awareness. It does not mention side effects, auth needs, or rate limits, but as a computation tool, safety is implied.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences, front-loaded with key information. No wasted words. The second sentence lists return components efficiently.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers inputs, process, and outputs. It mentions return as structured JSON listing major components. No output schema exists, so the description compensates well. Could mention error handling or edge cases, but overall adequate for the tool's complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description adds value by explaining the astronomical grounding, true-solar-time correction, and timezone awareness, which enriches the meaning of parameters like longitude and calendar type. This goes beyond the schema descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool computes a Korean Four Pillars chart from birth date/time. It specifies that it is deterministic, astronomically grounded, and returns specific structured components. No sibling tools exist, so differentiation is not needed.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for birth date/time based saju computation. It provides technical context (astronomical, timezone aware) but does not explicitly state when not to use or mention alternatives. However, given no siblings, the guidance is clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Try in Browser

Your Connectors

Sign in to create a connector for this server.

Resources