mifactory-scraping-api
Server Details
Web scraping for AI agents. Extract text and metadata from any URL worldwide. $0.005/page.
- Status
- Healthy
- Last Tested
- Transport
- Streamable HTTP
- URL
- Repository
- mifactory-bot/mifactory-scraping-api
- GitHub Stars
- 0
Glama MCP Gateway
Connect through Glama MCP Gateway for full control over tool access and complete visibility into every call.
Full call logging
Every tool call is logged with complete inputs and outputs, so you can debug issues and audit what your agents are doing.
Tool access control
Enable or disable individual tools per connector, so you decide what your agents can and cannot do.
Managed credentials
Glama handles OAuth flows, token storage, and automatic rotation, so credentials never expire on your clients.
Usage analytics
See which tools your agents call, how often, and when, so you can understand usage patterns and catch anomalies.
Tool Definition Quality
Average 3.1/5 across 1 of 1 tools scored.
With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion between tools. The single 'scrape' tool has a clear and distinct purpose.
The tool name 'scrape' is a simple, clear verb. As the only tool, there are no naming inconsistencies or mixed conventions.
A single tool is too few for a typical server, making it feel thin and underdeveloped. The server scope appears broader than what one tool can support.
The tool covers the core scraping functionality of extracting clean text from URLs. Minor gaps exist, such as options for structured data extraction or dynamic content handling, but the primary purpose is served.
Available Tools
1 toolscrapeBInspect
Extract clean text from any URL
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| url | Yes |
Tool Definition Quality
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description alone carries the burden of behavioral disclosure, but it only mentions the outcome ('extract clean text') without conveying any behavioral traits such as error handling, handling of dynamic content, rate limits, or whether the operation is read-only. This is a significant transparency gap.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, efficient sentence with no filler. It is appropriately sized for a simple tool and front-loads the core action, making it easy to process quickly.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Despite being a simple tool, the description is incomplete for an AI agent: it does not mention the return format, possible errors, or any limitations. Since there is no output schema and no annotations, the description should provide more context but does not.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema has one parameter (url) with no description and 0% schema coverage, so the description should compensate. 'From any URL' hints at the parameter but does not explain URL format, required protocol, or specific constraints. It adds only marginal meaning beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool's function: 'Extract clean text from any URL' uses a specific verb (extract), resource (URL), and output (clean text). Even without sibling tools, this is unambiguous and immediately distinguishes the tool's purpose.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor any prerequisites or context. It is a bare statement of functionality with no usage scenarios or exclusions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Claim this connector by publishing a /.well-known/glama.json file on your server's domain with the following structure:
{
"$schema": "https://glama.ai/mcp/schemas/connector.json",
"maintainers": [{ "email": "your-email@example.com" }]
}The email address must match the email associated with your Glama account. Once published, Glama will automatically detect and verify the file within a few minutes.
Control your server's listing on Glama, including description and metadata
Access analytics and receive server usage reports
Get monitoring and health status updates for your server
Feature your server to boost visibility and reach more users
For users:
Full audit trail – every tool call is logged with inputs and outputs for compliance and debugging
Granular tool control – enable or disable individual tools per connector to limit what your AI agents can do
Centralized credential management – store and rotate API keys and OAuth tokens in one place
Change alerts – get notified when a connector changes its schema, adds or removes tools, or updates tool definitions, so nothing breaks silently
For server owners:
Proven adoption – public usage metrics on your listing show real-world traction and build trust with prospective users
Tool-level analytics – see which tools are being used most, helping you prioritize development and documentation
Direct user feedback – users can report issues and suggest improvements through the listing, giving you a channel you would not have otherwise
The connector status is unhealthy when Glama is unable to successfully connect to the server. This can happen for several reasons:
The server is experiencing an outage
The URL of the server is wrong
Credentials required to access the server are missing or invalid
If you are the owner of this MCP connector and would like to make modifications to the listing, including providing test credentials for accessing the server, please contact support@glama.ai.
Discussions
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!
Related MCP Servers
Alicense-qualityBmaintenanceWeb data for AI agents: scrape, crawl, search, deep research, site monitoring, browser automation2533Apache 2.0- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to extract clean, structured web content (articles, tables, links, visual layouts) optimized for LLM token efficiency, with fast response times and optional JavaScript support.581MIT
- Alicense-qualityBmaintenanceThe web data platform for AI agents. Fetch, search, crawl, extract, monitor, and screenshot any URL. 55+ domain extractors, 65-98% token savings. 7 MCP tools included.33212AGPL 3.0
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceWeb scraping, crawling, and structured data extraction for AI agents. 5 tools: scrape (clean markdown from any URL), crawl (entire sites), map (discover URLs), extract (structured JSON), and search. 833ms avg latency, single binary, self-hostable.8571AGPL 3.0