Skip to main content
Glama

Server Details

Web scraping for AI agents. Extract text and metadata from any URL worldwide. $0.005/page.

Status
Healthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL
Repository
mifactory-bot/mifactory-scraping-api
GitHub Stars
0

Glama MCP Gateway

Connect through Glama MCP Gateway for full control over tool access and complete visibility into every call.

MCP client
Glama
MCP server

Full call logging

Every tool call is logged with complete inputs and outputs, so you can debug issues and audit what your agents are doing.

Tool access control

Enable or disable individual tools per connector, so you decide what your agents can and cannot do.

Managed credentials

Glama handles OAuth flows, token storage, and automatic rotation, so credentials never expire on your clients.

Usage analytics

See which tools your agents call, how often, and when, so you can understand usage patterns and catch anomalies.

100% free. Your data is private.
Tool DescriptionsB

Average 3.1/5 across 1 of 1 tools scored.

Server CoherenceA
Disambiguation5/5

With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion between tools. The single 'scrape' tool has a clear and distinct purpose.

Naming Consistency5/5

The tool name 'scrape' is a simple, clear verb. As the only tool, there are no naming inconsistencies or mixed conventions.

Tool Count2/5

A single tool is too few for a typical server, making it feel thin and underdeveloped. The server scope appears broader than what one tool can support.

Completeness4/5

The tool covers the core scraping functionality of extracting clean text from URLs. Minor gaps exist, such as options for structured data extraction or dynamic content handling, but the primary purpose is served.

Available Tools

1 tool
scrapeBInspect

Extract clean text from any URL

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
urlYes
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description alone carries the burden of behavioral disclosure, but it only mentions the outcome ('extract clean text') without conveying any behavioral traits such as error handling, handling of dynamic content, rate limits, or whether the operation is read-only. This is a significant transparency gap.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence with no filler. It is appropriately sized for a simple tool and front-loads the core action, making it easy to process quickly.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite being a simple tool, the description is incomplete for an AI agent: it does not mention the return format, possible errors, or any limitations. Since there is no output schema and no annotations, the description should provide more context but does not.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has one parameter (url) with no description and 0% schema coverage, so the description should compensate. 'From any URL' hints at the parameter but does not explain URL format, required protocol, or specific constraints. It adds only marginal meaning beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's function: 'Extract clean text from any URL' uses a specific verb (extract), resource (URL), and output (clean text). Even without sibling tools, this is unambiguous and immediately distinguishes the tool's purpose.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor any prerequisites or context. It is a bare statement of functionality with no usage scenarios or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Related MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables AI agents to extract clean, structured web content (articles, tables, links, visual layouts) optimized for LLM token efficiency, with fast response times and optional JavaScript support.
    5
    81
    MIT
  • A
    license
    -
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    The web data platform for AI agents. Fetch, search, crawl, extract, monitor, and screenshot any URL. 55+ domain extractors, 65-98% token savings. 7 MCP tools included.
    332
    12
    AGPL 3.0
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Web scraping, crawling, and structured data extraction for AI agents. 5 tools: scrape (clean markdown from any URL), crawl (entire sites), map (discover URLs), extract (structured JSON), and search. 833ms avg latency, single binary, self-hostable.
    8
    571
    AGPL 3.0

View all MCP Servers

Try in Browser

Your Connectors

Sign in to create a connector for this server.