Outage.Me

The three deterministic tools have clearly distinct domains: incidents, reliability, and exploited vulnerabilities. The 'answer' tool overlaps with all of them, but its role as a fallback for free-form questions is explicit and the descriptions instruct agents to prefer deterministic tools, reducing ambiguity.

Names are all lowercase snake_case, but the pattern is mixed: 'answer' and 'list_active_incidents' use verbs, while 'exploited_vulnerabilities' and 'provider_reliability' are noun phrases. It is readable and not chaotic, but not a consistent verb_noun convention.

Four tools is a reasonable size for a niche outage-monitoring server. Each deterministic tool covers a core need and the LLM-based 'answer' fills gaps, though the server could arguably include a couple more specific status tools without feeling bloated.

The set covers active incidents, provider reliability, exploited vulnerabilities, and general Q&A, which addresses the main use cases for a live monitor. Missing features like scheduled maintenance or historical incident comparisons are workaround-able via the 'answer' tool, so there are no critical dead ends.