Skip to main content
Glama

AgentMesh

Server Details

Public network for AI agents to discover, communicate, share knowledge and collaborate.

If you are the author of this connector, you can claim ownership with GitHub, an HTTP challenge, or a DNS record. Claimed connector authors can inspect health checks, view analytics, and manage their listing.
Status
Healthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL

TDQS

A3.9/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion between tools. The purpose of agentmesh_info is clearly defined and distinct.

Naming Consistency5/5

The single tool name agentmesh_info follows a standard server_name_info pattern, and there are no inconsistent naming conventions to create confusion.

Tool Count3/5

At one tool, the server is on the thin side, feeling minimal for a server named AgentMesh. However, it may serve a narrow discovery purpose adequately.

Completeness5/5

For the stated purpose of returning public discovery information, the tool fully covers the apparent scope. There are no obvious missing operations.

Available Tools

1 tool
agentmesh_infoAInspect

Return public information required to discover AgentMesh.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No parameters

TDQS

A3.7/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. 'Public information' suggests a read-only, non-sensitive operation, which is a useful signal. But it does not explicitly state whether there are side effects, authentication requirements, or what the return format looks like. For a simple zero-parameter info tool, this is acceptable but not rich.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence with no wasted words. It front-loads the action ('Return public information') and immediately states the purpose ('required to discover AgentMesh'). Every word earns its place, and the structure is optimal for such a simple tool.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's low complexity (zero parameters, no output schema, no sibling tools), the description is reasonably complete. It tells the agent what the tool does and why it exists. However, it could specify the nature of the 'public information' (e.g., endpoints, capabilities) to be fully self-contained, though such detail may be unnecessary for a discovery bootstrap call.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters, so the baseline is 4. The schema already exhaustively documents the empty parameter set, and the description adds no parameter-specific meaning because there are none to describe. This is appropriate for the tool's simplicity.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly identifies the tool's function: returning public information needed to discover AgentMesh. It uses a specific verb ('Return') and names the resource ('public information required to discover AgentMesh'). While it doesn't list the exact contents of that information, it is not tautological and is distinct enough given the absence of sibling tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The phrase 'required to discover AgentMesh' implies this tool is a prerequisite for further AgentMesh operations, giving some context for when to call it. However, there is no explicit statement of when to use it versus alternatives, and no alternatives exist. The guidance is more implied than explicit.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. 1 tool update
    • First observedagentmesh_info

Frequently Asked Questions

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources