Skip to main content
Glama

Server Details

TED MCP Server: Real-time EU public tenders access. https://www.lexsocket.ai/

If you are the author of this connector, you can claim ownership with GitHub, an HTTP challenge, or a DNS record. Claimed connector authors can inspect health checks, view analytics, and manage their listing.
Status
Unhealthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL
Repository
lexsocket/mcp-ted
GitHub Stars
0
Tool DescriptionsB

Average 3.6/5 across 23 of 23 tools scored. Lowest: 3/5.

Server CoherenceC
Disambiguation2/5

There are multiple pairs of tools with overlapping purposes that will cause confusion. For example, 'browse_by_deadline' and 'browse_tenders_by_deadline' appear to do the same thing but target different data sources (general tenders vs TED tenders), and similarly 'find_similar_ted_tenders' vs 'find_similar_tenders', 'get_ted_stats' vs 'get_stats', and multiple search tools with 'ted' vs non-ted variants. While descriptions clarify the distinction, the naming doesn't make this clear at first glance, leading to misselection risk.

Naming Consistency3/5

The naming follows a mostly consistent snake_case pattern, but there are significant inconsistencies in verb usage and structure. Some tools use 'browse_' prefix while others use 'search_', 'get_', or 'find_', without clear semantic distinction. Additionally, there are redundant tools with 'ted' vs non-ted variants that break consistency, and some tools have slightly different parameter names for similar concepts (e.g., 'notice_id' vs 'tender_id').

Tool Count2/5

With 23 tools, this server feels overloaded for a procurement tender domain. Many tools appear to be redundant variations (e.g., separate tools for TED vs national tenders that could be unified with parameters). The count suggests poor API design with duplication rather than well-scoped functionality, making it harder for agents to navigate and increasing the risk of tool misselection.

Completeness4/5

The tool surface provides comprehensive coverage for searching, browsing, and analyzing procurement tenders across multiple dimensions (deadline, buyer, CPV, NUTS, value range, etc.). It supports both TED and national tenders with statistics and similarity search. The main gap is the lack of update/delete operations, but this is reasonable for a read-only data exploration server focused on public procurement data.

Frequently Asked Questions

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Exposes French and EU public procurement data (BOAMP + TED) as MCP tools for AI agents, enabling search for tenders, awards, and winner intelligence via typed filters.
    4
    MIT
  • F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    MCP server for Canadian procurement intelligence, enabling unified search of federal and Alberta tender opportunities, deadline tracking, profile-based matching, daily briefs, and AI-assisted bid analysis.
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    MCP server for Spanish public procurement intelligence, providing tools to query tenders, awards, prices, and renewal forecasts from TED and PLACSP data.
    MIT
Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.