Skip to main content
Glama

Server Details

297 data tools across 90 MCP servers via one gateway. Free trial header; x402 USDC on Base.

If you are the author of this connector, you can claim ownership with GitHub, an HTTP challenge, or a DNS record. Claimed connector authors can inspect health checks, view analytics, and manage their listing.
Status
Unhealthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL

Frequently Asked Questions

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Pay-per-call MCP server for WebberSites x402 Data API, offering 45 tools for AI agents: web scraping, document extraction, SEO audits, linting, crypto data, and more, with payment via USDC on Base.
    63
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    MCP server for pay-per-call DeFi and crypto data via x402 micropayments on Base. 8 endpoints: token prices, TVL, funding rates, token security, gas tracker, whale monitoring, wallet profiling, and yield scanning.
    8
    51
    MIT
  • F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    56 pay-per-call MCP endpoints for AI agents. Market signals, macro economics, crypto/DeFi, geopolitical intelligence, SEC filings, GitHub velocity, sanctions screening. USDC on Base Mainnet via x402.
Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

C2.9/5.0
Disambiguation1/5

Massive overlap between tools from different sub-domains, e.g., two separate quote tools (quote-intel and quotes-intel), two weather tools (forecast-intel and weather-intel), two space tools (space-intel and nasa-intel). An agent would struggle to choose correctly.

Naming Consistency5/5

Every tool follows a consistent pattern: domain-intel__verb_noun. This makes the tool set predictable despite its size.

Tool Count1/5

294 tools is orders of magnitude too many for a coherent server. It lumps together dozens of unrelated domains, making navigation and selection impractical.

Completeness2/5

While individual domains may have reasonable coverage, the overall set is bloated with duplicates (two quote systems, two word definition tools) and lacks a unifying theme. Significant gaps are less obvious, but the duplication indicates poor design.

Resources