Skip to main content
Glama

ai-rate-limit-tracker

Server Details

Cloudflare Workers MCP server: ai-rate-limit-tracker

Status
Healthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL
Repository
lazymac2x/ai-rate-limit-tracker-api
GitHub Stars
0

Glama MCP Gateway

Connect through Glama MCP Gateway for full control over tool access and complete visibility into every call.

MCP client
Glama
MCP server

Full call logging

Every tool call is logged with complete inputs and outputs, so you can debug issues and audit what your agents are doing.

Tool access control

Enable or disable individual tools per connector, so you decide what your agents can and cannot do.

Managed credentials

Glama handles OAuth flows, token storage, and automatic rotation, so credentials never expire on your clients.

Usage analytics

See which tools your agents call, how often, and when, so you can understand usage patterns and catch anomalies.

100% free. Your data is private.
Tool DescriptionsA

Average 3.8/5 across 1 of 1 tools scored.

Server CoherenceB
Disambiguation5/5

Only one tool exists, so there is no ambiguity in tool selection.

Naming Consistency5/5

The single tool follows a consistent snake_case naming pattern with the server name prefix.

Tool Count2/5

A single health check tool is far too few for a rate limit tracker; expected tools for checking limits and resets are missing.

Completeness1/5

The server lacks essential functionality like retrieving current rate limits or reset times, making it severely incomplete for its stated purpose.

Available Tools

1 tool
ai_rate_limit_tracker_healthAInspect

Check AI Rate Limit Tracker API service health

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No parameters

Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only states it checks health, implying a read operation, but does not specify what exactly happens, whether it requires authentication, or what the response format is. This is insufficient for an agent.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no waste. It conveys the tool's purpose efficiently.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple health-check tool with no parameters and no siblings, the description is mostly complete. However, the lack of an output schema and absence of any mention of return format means an agent lacks full context. A slight improvement would be to mention typical responses like 'healthy' or 'unhealthy'.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There are zero parameters, so the input schema trivially covers 100%. According to guidelines, baseline is 4. The description adds no parameter info, but none is needed.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The verb 'Check' and resource 'AI Rate Limit Tracker API service health' are specific and unambiguous. No sibling tools exist, so differentiation is not needed.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description does not state when to use this tool (e.g., before other API calls) or provide any exclusion criteria. Context signals show no siblings, so lack of guidance is less critical but still missing.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Try in Browser

Your Connectors

Sign in to create a connector for this server.