Skip to main content
Glama

Server Details

Cloudflare Workers MCP server: ai-prompt-optimizer

Status
Healthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL
Repository
lazymac2x/ai-prompt-optimizer-api
GitHub Stars
0

Glama MCP Gateway

Connect through Glama MCP Gateway for full control over tool access and complete visibility into every call.

MCP client
Glama
MCP server

Full call logging

Every tool call is logged with complete inputs and outputs, so you can debug issues and audit what your agents are doing.

Tool access control

Enable or disable individual tools per connector, so you decide what your agents can and cannot do.

Managed credentials

Glama handles OAuth flows, token storage, and automatic rotation, so credentials never expire on your clients.

Usage analytics

See which tools your agents call, how often, and when, so you can understand usage patterns and catch anomalies.

100% free. Your data is private.
Tool DescriptionsB

Average 3.3/5 across 1 of 1 tools scored.

Server CoherenceB
Disambiguation5/5

With only one tool, there is no possibility of ambiguity. The tool has a clear and distinct purpose.

Naming Consistency5/5

A single tool follows a consistent snake_case naming pattern, which is standard and predictable.

Tool Count1/5

The server name 'ai-prompt-optimizer' implies a domain for optimizing prompts, yet it exposes only a health check endpoint. One tool is far too few for the apparent scope.

Completeness1/5

The tool set is severely incomplete; it lacks any tools for the core purpose of prompt optimization, offering only a health check.

Available Tools

1 tool
ai_prompt_optimizer_healthBInspect

Check AI Prompt Optimizer API service health

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No parameters

Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided. The description implies a read-only, non-destructive operation without stating it explicitly. It lacks detail on what exactly 'health' entails (e.g., response format, whether it queries dependencies).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, directly to the point. No wasted words; every word earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a health check tool with no parameters and no output schema, the description is adequate but not thorough. It does not explain what the response indicates (e.g., status code, message) which would be helpful for an agent to interpret the result.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema is empty with no parameters. Schema description coverage is 100% (fully covered by schema). The description does not add extra meaning beyond the schema, which is acceptable for zero parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states verb 'Check' and resource 'AI Prompt Optimizer API service health'. It is unambiguous and distinguishes the tool's purpose, though with no sibling tools there is no need for differentiation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use or not use this tool. For a health check, it is typically safe to call whenever status is needed, but the description does not clarify that or mention any prerequisites.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Try in Browser

Your Connectors

Sign in to create a connector for this server.