Skip to main content
Glama

Server Details

Voice-to-PDF daily construction reports. Court-ready documentation for subcontractors

Status
Healthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL

Glama MCP Gateway

Connect through Glama MCP Gateway for full control over tool access and complete visibility into every call.

MCP client
Glama
MCP server

Full call logging

Every tool call is logged with complete inputs and outputs, so you can debug issues and audit what your agents are doing.

Tool access control

Enable or disable individual tools per connector, so you decide what your agents can and cannot do.

Managed credentials

Glama handles OAuth flows, token storage, and automatic rotation, so credentials never expire on your clients.

Usage analytics

See which tools your agents call, how often, and when, so you can understand usage patterns and catch anomalies.

100% free. Your data is private.

Tool Definition Quality

Score is being calculated. Check back soon.

Available Tools

3 tools
create_daily_log_templateInspect

Generate a construction daily log template.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
project_typeNo
get_logging_requirementsInspect

Get daily log compliance requirements.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
project_typeNo
list_construction_faqCInspect

Search construction logging FAQ.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
queryNo
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must fully disclose behavior. It only says 'Search construction logging FAQ' without explaining whether a query is required, what happens if no query is given, if the operation is read-only, or what output format to expect. Behavioral details are insufficient.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very concise with a single sentence, which is good for brevity. However, it sacrifices necessary detail, making it under-informative. It could be longer to improve clarity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the lack of annotations and output schema, the description should explain the tool's behavior more completely. It does not specify the nature of the FAQ, how searching works, or what the response contains, leaving significant gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has one parameter 'query' with no description (0% coverage). The tool description adds no meaning to this parameter, leaving the agent unaware of how to use it effectively.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose3/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states the verb 'Search' and resource 'construction logging FAQ', indicating a search or listing function. However, the name says 'list' while description says 'Search', creating slight inconsistency. The exact meaning of 'construction logging FAQ' is vague without further context.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus the sibling tools. There is no mention of use cases, prerequisites, or situations where this tool is preferred.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Try in Browser

Your Connectors

Sign in to create a connector for this server.

Resources