Skip to main content
Glama

Server Details

Wormhole - 69 tools for cross-chain transfers and bridge data

Status
Unhealthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL
Repository
junct-bot/wormhole-mcp
GitHub Stars
0

Glama MCP Gateway

Connect through Glama MCP Gateway for full control over tool access and complete visibility into every call.

MCP client
Glama
MCP server

Full call logging

Every tool call is logged with complete inputs and outputs, so you can debug issues and audit what your agents are doing.

Tool access control

Enable or disable individual tools per connector, so you decide what your agents can and cannot do.

Managed credentials

Glama handles OAuth flows, token storage, and automatic rotation, so credentials never expire on your clients.

Usage analytics

See which tools your agents call, how often, and when, so you can understand usage patterns and catch anomalies.

100% free. Your data is private.
Tool DescriptionsC

Average 2.7/5 across 73 of 73 tools scored. Lowest: 2/5.

Server CoherenceC
Disambiguation2/5

Many tools have overlapping purposes, causing significant ambiguity. For example, multiple tools like 'find_vaa_by_id', 'find_duplicated_vaa_by_id', and 'get_transaction_by_id' all seem to retrieve VAA-related data with unclear distinctions. Similarly, governor-related tools (e.g., 'governor_notional_available_by_chain', 'governor_max_notional_available_by_chain') have overlapping scopes, making it hard for an agent to choose the right one without deep domain knowledge.

Naming Consistency3/5

The naming is mixed but somewhat readable. There are consistent patterns within groups (e.g., 'find_' prefix for VAA/observation queries, 'governor_' prefix for governor data), but overall conventions vary: some use snake_case (e.g., 'api_v1_native_token_transfer_activity'), others use simpler forms (e.g., 'circulating_supply'), and there's no uniform verb-noun structure. This inconsistency can confuse agents but doesn't render the set unreadable.

Tool Count2/5

With 73 tools, the count is excessive for a single server, indicating poor scoping. While Wormhole is a complex blockchain protocol, the tool surface feels bloated with many overlapping or highly specialized functions (e.g., multiple governor notional tools). A more curated set of 15-30 tools would likely suffice, making this overly heavy and difficult for agents to navigate efficiently.

Completeness4/5

The tool set appears highly complete for the Wormhole domain, covering VAAs, transactions, governor data, token transfers, and protocol analytics. There are discovery tools, CRUD-like operations for queries, and monitoring functions. Minor gaps might exist in mutation operations (e.g., creating or updating data), but given the exploratory/read-only nature implied, coverage is thorough for data retrieval and analysis.

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Try in Browser

Your Connectors

Sign in to create a connector for this server.