Skip to main content
Glama

Server Details

Stargate - 42 tools for cross-chain transfers and bridge data

If you are the author of this connector, you can claim ownership with GitHub, an HTTP challenge, or a DNS record. Claimed connector authors can inspect health checks, view analytics, and manage their listing.
Status
Unhealthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL
Repository
junct-bot/stargate-mcp
GitHub Stars
0
Server Listing
Stargate MCP Server

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. 42 tool updates
    • First observedactivateChainPath
    • First observedaddLiquidity
    • First observedbridge
    • First observedcachedSwapLookup
    • First observedCachedSwapSaved
    • First observedcallDelta
    • First observedclearCachedSwap
    • First observedcreateChainPath
    • First observedcreatePool
    • First observedcreditChainPath
    • First observedfactory
    • First observedinstantRedeemLocal
    • First observedmintFeeOwner
    • First observedowner
    • First observedOwnershipTransferred
    • First observedprotocolFeeOwner
    • First observedquoteLayerZeroFee
    • First observedredeemLocal
    • First observedredeemLocalCallback
    • First observedRedeemLocalCallback
    • First observedredeemLocalCheckOnRemote
    • First observedredeemRemote
    • First observedrenounceOwnership
    • First observedretryRevert
    • First observedRevert
    • First observedrevertLookup
    • First observedrevertRedeemLocal
    • First observedRevertRedeemLocal
    • First observedsendCredits
    • First observedsetBridgeAndFactory
    • First observedsetDeltaParam
    • First observedsetFeeLibrary
    • First observedsetFees
    • First observedsetMintFeeOwner
    • First observedsetProtocolFeeOwner
    • First observedsetSwapStop
    • First observedsetWeightForChainPath
    • First observedswap
    • First observedswapRemote
    • First observedtransferOwnership
    • First observedwithdrawMintFee
    • First observedwithdrawProtocolFee

Frequently Asked Questions

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Provides real-time cross-chain bridge metrics, enabling AI agents to analyze liquidity, transaction flows, and performance across blockchain networks.
    5
    2
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Finds best cross-chain bridge routes across 60+ chains and 18+ bridges, comparing fees and time, with pay-per-call via x402 USDC micropayments.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Enables AI agents to perform cross-chain bridging operations using natural language intents, with support for multiple protocols (Across, Stargate) and advanced security features like oracle validation and slippage protection. Provides comprehensive bridging tools including quote estimation, transaction building, and approval management across Arbitrum and Ethereum networks.
    MIT
Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

B3.1/5.0
Disambiguation3/5

The tools are distinct in their specific contract function calls, but there is significant overlap in purpose and naming that could cause confusion. For example, multiple redeem-related tools (redeemLocal, redeemLocalCallback, redeemLocalCheckOnRemote, revertRedeemLocal) have unclear boundaries, and tools like cachedSwapLookup and revertLookup are similarly vague. Descriptions help differentiate, but the high count and technical nature increase misselection risk.

Naming Consistency4/5

Tool names follow a consistent camelCase pattern throughout, with clear verb-action naming (e.g., addLiquidity, createPool, setFees). Minor deviations include some tools with 'Lookup' suffixes and event names in PascalCase, but the overall convention is predictable and readable.

Tool Count2/5

With 42 tools, the count is excessive for an MCP server, making it overwhelming and difficult to navigate. While the domain (Stargate contract interactions) is complex, this many tools suggests poor scoping, likely mapping directly to contract functions without aggregation, which hinders usability.

Completeness5/5

The tool set appears complete for interacting with the Stargate contract, covering core operations like liquidity management (addLiquidity, swap), pool configuration (createPool, setFees), cross-chain functions (redeemRemote, sendCredits), and ownership controls (transferOwnership, renounceOwnership). No obvious gaps are evident given the inferred domain.