Skip to main content
Glama

Server Details

Aave - 6 tools for lending rates, supply, and borrow data

Status
Unhealthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL
Repository
junct-bot/aave-mcp
GitHub Stars
0

Glama MCP Gateway

Connect through Glama MCP Gateway for full control over tool access and complete visibility into every call.

MCP client
Glama
MCP server

Full call logging

Every tool call is logged with complete inputs and outputs, so you can debug issues and audit what your agents are doing.

Tool access control

Enable or disable individual tools per connector, so you decide what your agents can and cannot do.

Managed credentials

Glama handles OAuth flows, token storage, and automatic rotation, so credentials never expire on your clients.

Usage analytics

See which tools your agents call, how often, and when, so you can understand usage patterns and catch anomalies.

100% free. Your data is private.
Tool DescriptionsA

Average 3.7/5 across 6 of 6 tools scored. Lowest: 3.1/5.

Server CoherenceB
Disambiguation3/5

The tools have some overlap in purpose, particularly admin and implementation which both retrieve addresses, and upgradeTo/upgradeToAndCall which are similar upgrade operations. However, the descriptions clarify their specific parameters and behaviors, helping to distinguish them. The event tool (Upgraded) is clearly distinct from the callable functions.

Naming Consistency2/5

Naming is inconsistent with mixed conventions: most tools use lowercase (e.g., admin, initialize) while one uses uppercase (Upgraded). There is no clear verb_noun pattern, and the event tool breaks from the function naming style. This makes the set less predictable and harder to parse.

Tool Count4/5

With 6 tools, the count is reasonable for a smart contract interaction server, covering key admin and upgrade functions. It is slightly thin but appropriate for the focused scope of contract management, without being overwhelming or insufficient.

Completeness3/5

The tools cover core upgrade and initialization functions for a proxy contract, but there are notable gaps: no read-only functions to check contract state (e.g., getters for current logic), and no tools for common operations like pausing or ownership transfers. This limits the surface for full contract lifecycle management.

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Try in Browser

Your Connectors

Sign in to create a connector for this server.