Skip to main content
Glama

Industrial Platform x402 Adoption Search

Server Details

Search current x402 adoption, integrations, launches and machine-payment activity.

If you are the author of this connector, you can claim ownership by verifying the domain or GitHub account it belongs to. Claimed connector authors can inspect health checks, view analytics, and manage their listing.
Status
Healthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP · MCP 2025-11-25
URL
Repository
industrial-platform-ai/industrial-platform-agent-tools
GitHub Stars
0

TDQS

A4.1/5.0

Scored across 1 tool

Disambiguation5/5

With only a single tool in the set, there is no possibility of confusing it with another tool. Its purpose (web search for x402 adoption signals) is unambiguous and self-contained.

Naming Consistency4/5

The sole tool uses a readable, verb-first kebab-case name, so no cross-tool inconsistency can arise. It is unusually verbose and doubles as an instruction sentence, which is slightly less clean than a compact verb_noun pattern.

Tool Count3/5

The server is narrowly scoped, so one tool is defensible, but a single endpoint is thin even for a search service (no pagination, date-range, or fetch-result companions). It sits at the borderline of being underbuilt.

Completeness3/5

A search tool alone covers discovery but leaves obvious gaps: no time-window or source filtering, no result-limit/pagination controls, and no way to retrieve or read a page beyond the search snippet. Agents can work around this, but the surface is minimal.

Available Tools

1 tool
search-the-web-for-x402-adoptionAInspect

Search the web for x402 adoption, x402 integrations, x402 agent payments, x402 ecosystem launches and machine-to-machine payment adoption. Built to satisfy recurring autonomous-agent research demand for current x402 adoption signals. Costs $0.001 USDC on Base via x402.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNoMaximum results per source; default 5.
queryNoSearch phrase. Defaults to x402 adoption.

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full behavioral burden, but it discloses a critical trait: the tool costs $0.001 USDC on Base via x402. It does not describe response format, rate limits, or the exact payment/auth flow, so it is not fully comprehensive.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three tight sentences: the first front-loads the search scope, the second explains the intended recurring-agent demand, and the third discloses the cost. No sentence is wasted.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a low-complexity, two-parameter search tool with full schema coverage and no output schema, the description covers purpose, usage context, and payment cost well. It could be slightly more complete by noting result behavior or alternatives, but it is largely sufficient.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents both parameters, including defaults and limits. The description adds no parameter-specific meaning beyond the schema baseline.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb ('Search the web') and names the exact resource/domain: x402 adoption, integrations, agent payments, ecosystem launches, and machine-to-machine payments. This clearly distinguishes it from generic web-search or scraping siblings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It provides clear usage context by stating it is 'Built to satisfy recurring autonomous-agent research demand for current x402 adoption signals.' However, it does not explicitly name when not to use it or point to an alternative tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. 1 tool update
    • First observedsearch-the-web-for-x402-adoption

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Lets an agent query the x402 payment market read off Base and Solana chains: the newest market day, sellers searchable by job or intent, individual seller cards with prices and payer concentration, the hosts behind one wallet group, buyer wallets paying three or more sellers, and side-by-side host comparisons. Reads only the site's published rolling windows — free and keyless, with optional paid per-call reports.
    6
    MIT
  • A
    license
    B
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Agent payments ecosystem intelligence. Scans GitHub, Hacker News, and npm for activity across AP2, ACP, x402, MPP, and UCP protocols. Returns scored and classified opportunities. Free protocol info and comparison, paid scan via x402 USDC
    3
    50 npm
    1
    Apache 2.0
Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.