Skip to main content
Glama

Server Details

Free Thai personal income tax (PIT) calculator for salaried employees, from mythaitaxes.com.

Status
Healthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL

Glama MCP Gateway

Connect through Glama MCP Gateway for full control over tool access and complete visibility into every call.

MCP client
Glama
MCP server

Full call logging

Every tool call is logged with complete inputs and outputs, so you can debug issues and audit what your agents are doing.

Tool access control

Enable or disable individual tools per connector, so you decide what your agents can and cannot do.

Managed credentials

Glama handles OAuth flows, token storage, and automatic rotation, so credentials never expire on your clients.

Usage analytics

See which tools your agents call, how often, and when, so you can understand usage patterns and catch anomalies.

100% free. Your data is private.
Tool DescriptionsA

Average 4.1/5 across 1 of 1 tools scored.

Server CoherenceA
Disambiguation5/5

Only one tool exists, so no ambiguity between tools.

Naming Consistency5/5

Single tool follows a clear verb_noun pattern, no inconsistency.

Tool Count2/5

One tool is too few for a server named 'mythaitaxes-mcp', suggesting a narrow scope that likely leaves many tax-related operations uncovered.

Completeness2/5

The tool only handles salaried employee annual income tax, missing other tax types (e.g., corporate, VAT, withholding) that the server name implies.

Available Tools

1 tool
calculate_thai_annual_income_taxCalculate Thai Annual Personal Income TaxAInspect

Calculates Thailand personal income tax (PIT) for a salaried employee for a tax year, using current progressive tax brackets, standard allowances, and common deductions (social security, insurance, retirement funds, donations). Returns taxable income, tax owed, effective rate, and refund/amount owed against tax already withheld. Source: mythaitaxes.com.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
rmfNoRetirement Mutual Fund contribution, max deductible 500,000 THB.
ssfNoSuper Savings Fund contribution, max deductible 200,000 THB.
donationsNoCharitable donations, capped at 10% of income after allowances.
pensionFundNoMax deductible 500,000 THB.
taxWithheldNoTax already withheld by the employer this year, used to compute refund vs. amount owed.
annualIncomeYesTotal annual gross income in THB, before any deductions.
lifeInsuranceNoMax deductible 100,000 THB.
maritalStatusNosingle
providentFundNoMax deductible 500,000 THB.
isAge65OrOlderNoAdds the 190,000 THB senior allowance.
healthInsuranceNoMax deductible 25,000 THB.
numberOfParentsNoDependent parents supported (30,000 THB each, max 4).
numberOfChildrenNo
spouseHasNoIncomeNoTrue if married and the spouse has no income (unlocks the 60,000 THB spouse allowance).
childrenBornOnOrAfter2018No2nd-or-later children born in 2018 or after qualify for a doubled (60,000 THB) allowance.
socialSecurityContributionNoAnnual social security fund contribution, max deductible 10,500 THB.
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It discloses that calculation uses current tax brackets and common deductions, and mentions the source. However, it does not state whether the calculation is an estimate or based on official law, nor does it describe limitations (e.g., only for salaried income). Overall, it is mostly transparent but could be more explicit.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence plus a source citation. It is concise and front-loaded with the main action. While not structured with bullet points, it is efficient and covers the essentials without unnecessary words. Slight improvement could be splitting into multiple sentences for clarity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 16 parameters (only one required), no output schema, and no siblings, the description provides a good overview. It lists the output fields and cites the source. However, it does not explain the calculation methodology, such as progressive tax brackets or order of deductions. It is complete enough for a typical user but could be enhanced with more detail.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 88%, meaning most parameters are already described in the schema. The description adds high-level categories (social security, insurance, retirement funds, donations) but does not provide additional details beyond what is in the schema. With high coverage, the baseline is 3, and the description adds minimal extra value.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it calculates Thailand personal income tax for a salaried employee, using current brackets, allowances, and deductions. It specifies the outputs: taxable income, tax owed, effective rate, and refund/amount owed. There are no sibling tools to differentiate, but the purpose is precise and unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies it is for a salaried employee in a tax year, using standard deductions. It does not explicitly mention when not to use it or provide alternatives, but since there are no sibling tools, the lack of exclusions is acceptable. The source citation adds credibility but does not replace usage guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Try in Browser

Your Connectors

Sign in to create a connector for this server.

Resources